[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/a/


File: Isac's Desktop.png (29 MB, 1152x864)
29 MB
29 MB PNG
OH HAI
>>
File: 1209478168967.jpg (9 KB, 256x288)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
sup
>>
>>11284757

The strongest girl with the strongest feet....that would be the strongest footjob...
>>
>>11284777
two tails?
>>
>>11284777
oto-san!
>>
File: 1209478870660.jpg (27 KB, 424x457)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
Imouto yo!
>>
File: 1209478918440.jpg (56 KB, 704x396)
56 KB
56 KB JPG
>>11284778
This is the strongest footjob
>>
SAME GOD DAMN PERSON.
SAME GOD DAMN WALLPAPER.
SAME GOD DAMN DESKTOP.
SAME GOD DAMN "OH HAI".
SAME GOD DAMN ICONS.
FUCKING CUT IT OUT. FUCK.
>>
>>11284757
/r/ wallpaper
>>
File: 1209479081261.jpg (56 KB, 595x442)
56 KB
56 KB JPG
>>11284757
>>
>>11284875
Same god damn png
>>
File: 1209479328401.jpg (181 KB, 1280x800)
181 KB
181 KB JPG
>>
File: 1209479578404.jpg (177 KB, 1600x1200)
177 KB
177 KB JPG
>>
File: 1209479663986.jpg (194 KB, 2048x768)
194 KB
194 KB JPG
>>11284757
Hey man what's up?
>>
File: 1209479731694.jpg (523 KB, 1680x1050)
523 KB
523 KB JPG
Where's your god now?
>>
File: 1209479814354.jpg (253 KB, 1400x1400)
253 KB
253 KB JPG
>>11284889
>>
>>11284994
NUTBLADDER
>>
>>11284979

Can you post that bleach pic in its entirety on /h/ or /d/ please?
>>
>>11284979
downloadin anime
>>
File: 1209480502949.jpg (415 KB, 1024x768)
415 KB
415 KB JPG
>>11285113
it is the whole image
>>
>>11285160

Well that is a fucking letdown of inifinite proportions...
>>
File: 1209480598827.jpg (255 KB, 1024x768)
255 KB
255 KB JPG
>>
File: 1209480730709.png (147 KB, 1440x900)
147 KB
147 KB PNG
Desktop thread?
>>
>>11285207
yes
>>
F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5
>>
File: 1209481299934.jpg (433 KB, 2560x1024)
433 KB
433 KB JPG
>>
File: 1209482839468.jpg (103 KB, 1280x1024)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
>>
>>11285634

sauce for the VITA app. please!!!
>>
>>11285634

bump for sauce
>>
>>11287188
>sauce for the useless memory hog
>>
File: 1209488974349.jpg (184 KB, 1680x1050)
184 KB
184 KB JPG
>>11284757
Superior music player.
>>
File: 1209489086136.png (3 KB, 48x48)
3 KB
3 KB PNG
>>11287324
fail less
>>
>>11287347
Explain to me exactly how foobar is better than iTunes.
>>
File: 1209489233473.gif (85 KB, 352x200)
85 KB
85 KB GIF
>>11287324 iTunes
>>
>Winamp
>>
File: 1209489317347.png (279 KB, 629x501)
279 KB
279 KB PNG
>>11287324
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA OH WOW
>>
>>11287376
sorry we don't have time to explain your stupidity
>>
>>11287390
>foobar
Ha ha, oh wow.
>>
File: 1209489404597.png (5 KB, 411x79)
5 KB
5 KB PNG
>>11287376
>>
>>11287407
>sorry, I'm basing my opinion on the fact that more people use itunes then foobar, thus automatically making foobar better.

Enjoy your baseless elitism.
>>
>>11287390
sauce/name of layout now.
>>
File: 1209489618722.jpg (69 KB, 600x499)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
>>11287412
see
>>11287407

Also cry more winampfag.
>>
>>11284994

Can i have that wallpaper please?
>>
>>11287390
Source for configuration please.
>>
File: 1209489774028.jpg (126 KB, 877x668)
126 KB
126 KB JPG
>>11287413
My computer runs perfectly with iTunes running alongside numerous other applications.

What's the point in freeing up memory just to see it go to waste?
>>
>>11287509
lol Vista
>>
File: 1209489936307.jpg (13 KB, 320x240)
13 KB
13 KB JPG
>>11287438
The superiority of foobar was proven a thousand times.It gets tiring you know.Lurk the fuck more.
>>
File: 1209489972809.jpg (4 KB, 340x74)
4 KB
4 KB JPG
>>11287509

Jesus fuck.
>>
>>11287188
>>11287249
http://rapidshare.com/files/32560233/nanoha_rainmeters.rar.html
Google for Rainmeter.
>>
I still haven't been given a decent reason.
>>
>>11287557
thanks
>>
>>11287540
Say, I always wondered how many processes is normal. There are a bunch that seem to be system critical. I have about 40 running at the moment, is that alright or too high?
>>
File: 1209490326743.png (15 KB, 404x455)
15 KB
15 KB PNG
>>11287566
I haven't checked my boot settings for a while, so I've probably got a few unnecessary ones.

>>11287509
>>11287540
I lol'd. fucking hard
>>
>>11287597
Hmm, ok, thanks. I should be able to cut down 10 easily by disabling a few programs I like to have preloaded.
>>
>>11287559
customizable (less fugly gui),less bloat,less faggotry,more functions
>>
>>11287509
OH WOW
>>
>>11287390
no wait, i fuck need that layout. please give
>>
>>11287557

This has no Vita. Also, I have no idea how to install it. Why is the .ini asking for stuff about Winamp?
>>
Samefag from

>>11284875

HOW IS THIS STILL ALIVE?
FUCKING FUCK FUCK.
>>
>>11287638

Nevermind. Thanks Google.
>>
>>11287390
Share the goddamn configuration. Can that shit run with panels UI?
>>
>>11287390
This >>11287650
>>
>>11287608
I use it to play music.
I double click on a song, it plays. Call me a philistine, but I honestly don't give two shits about the sound quality of my shitty anime music and when it comes to my classics, I don't have hearing sharp enough to differentiate between a lossless .m4a and a .FLAC file. Everything else is meaningless.

>>11287597
I use my PC for writing essays, watching anime and listening to music - I haven't picked up a game since I was sixteen. I can play 720p with no problems whatsoever and I only ever watch 1080 on my laptop, hooked up to my TV. It runs flawlessly on that. Boot time? On the rare occasions I actually turn my PC back on, I have the patience to wait a few second for it to fire up. Go see someone about your ADHD.

I simply have no need to improve things. It's like laughing at a bloke wearing old shoes.
>>
>>11287724
I like to optimize my PC so I most have ADHD. Go you, ignorant fuck.
>>
File: 1209491358247.jpg (749 KB, 1440x900)
749 KB
749 KB JPG
>>
>>11287724
>differentiate between a lossless .m4a and a .FLAC file
You can't since they're both lossless.
>>
File: 1209491490658.png (8 MB, 1280x800)
8 MB
8 MB PNG
I remember when the mods would delete all my desktop threads within 30 seconds. Ah well.
>>
>>11285160


cute ;)

"toilet" btw.. (benki).
>>
File: 1209491581592.png (538 KB, 1024x768)
538 KB
538 KB PNG
>>
>>11287822

You don't belong here.
>>
>>11287782

Is that some Lucky Star in the "rejects" folder?
>>
so that source for that foobar layout???
>>
>>11287763
Going too fast to read the rest of the post, were you?

And why, exactly, do you like to optimise your PC? Going back to the shoe analogy, that's like going out of your way and getting custom running spikes just to walk down the street. What's your version of a professional level 100m sprint?
>>
>>11287873

Take it outside already you fucktards.
>>
File: 1209491877363.jpg (114 KB, 1440x900)
114 KB
114 KB JPG
>>
>>11287900

Of all the places to mspaint out your icons, you chose /a/.

Good sir, even if you werent anonymous, do you think anyone would care?
>>
>>11287917

Ok ok, well they are shortcuts to Gaia online, vampirefreaks, myspace and facebook. I thought you guys didnt like that stuff so I blocked it out.
>>
>>11287873
Because I want photoshop to be able to handle dozens of layers on a document that's several megapixels big? Because I like to have my computer run swiftly? Because my career will probably involve informatics? If you're really as ignorant as to not want your computer to run smooth, go get a $50 1995 pc.
>>
>>11287917
Of course people would care. I'm the most important poster in this imageboard, even posting as "Anonymous" there are a lot of people here that recognize me just by looking at my posts.
>>
>>11287390
oh god sauce for this?
>>
>>11284757

sauce on backround?
>>
File: 1209492174119.jpg (195 KB, 1280x800)
195 KB
195 KB JPG
>>
>>11287939

ummm why are you impersonating as me?
>>
File: 1209492374385.jpg (217 KB, 1680x1050)
217 KB
217 KB JPG
here's mine
>>
File: 1209492740893.png (21 MB, 1440x900)
21 MB
21 MB PNG
meh
>>
File: 1209492785712.jpg (156 KB, 1024x768)
156 KB
156 KB JPG
>>
>>11287934
>Because I want photoshop to be able to handle dozens of layers on a document that's several >megapixels big?
I'm not a graphics designer, five layers of an image around half a megapixel in size is the most I'll ever need.
>Because I like to have my computer run swiftly?
We've been through this, and established that mine does.
>Because my career will probably involve informatics?
Will being the operative word there, I assume? My career will definitely involve economics, but I don't find it necessary to have eight monitors and a copy of Bloomberg running constantly.
>If you're really as ignorant as to not want your computer to run smooth, go get a $50 1995 pc.
My computer does run smoothly. Attacking the same invalid point from the same angle multiple times in succession does not constitute a good argument.


So in the end, you're still standing there on the tartan in your nice shiny spikes, laughing your head off at a bemused man plodding along on the grass in the shoes he picked up for £20 a few years ago and have served him perfectly ever since.
>>
File: 1209492997860.jpg (234 KB, 1680x1050)
234 KB
234 KB JPG
Am I cool yet?
>>
>>11288127
We've been through this, and established that mine does.
>No it doesn't. You have 80+ processes running. It probably takes you twice as long to load stuff. inb4BUTIDON'TNEEDITFASTER, don't bullshit, there's no point in having something run slower if you can help it. If not, optimization wouldn't exist.

>Will being the operative word there, I assume? My career will definitely involve economics, but I don't find it necessary to have eight monitors and a copy of Bloomberg running constantly.
I'm going to college right now, and do use several memory intensive (most of the adobe master collection, .net, etc) programs at once. You don't find it necessary to run 8 monitors at once? Well, neither do I, but I don't find it necessary to run 80 processes for no reason.

>My computer does run smoothly. Attacking the same invalid point from the same angle multiple times in succession does not constitute a good argument.
No it doesn't and yes it does, you're just ignoring it.
>>
>We've been through this, and established that mine does.
No it doesn't. You have 80+ processes running. It probably takes you twice as long to load stuff. inb4BUTIDON'TNEEDITFASTER, don't bullshit, there's no point in having something run slower if you can help it. If not, optimization wouldn't exist.

>Will being the operative word there, I assume? My career will definitely involve economics, but I don't find it necessary to have eight monitors and a copy of Bloomberg running constantly.
I'm going to college right now, and do use several memory intensive (most of the adobe master collection, .net, etc) programs at once. You don't find it necessary to run 8 monitors at once? Well, neither do I, but I don't find it necessary to run 80 processes for no reason.

>My computer does run smoothly. Attacking the same invalid point from the same angle multiple times in succession does not constitute a good argument.
No it doesn't and yes it does, you're just ignoring it.
>>
If seen this thread so many times but I haven't seen the wallpaper. Because it's PNG.
>>
>>11288243
Why can't you just let him be? Arguing with this kind of idiot is futile and nothing more than a waste of time.

Just chill.
>>
File: 1209493903435.jpg (163 KB, 1440x900)
163 KB
163 KB JPG
>>
File: 1209494152439.png (14 KB, 300x330)
14 KB
14 KB PNG
>>11288303

iRage in a nutshell.
>>
I wonder if all the guys with Crysis on their desktops can even run it at full settings.
>>
>>11288483
I can run it decently oh high (60+ fps). On very high (though I have to copy the settings to high to get dx10, as I'm running XP, not vista), I only get around 30+. I'm getting a second 8800GT some time soon though, which should fix it. As a note, I don't particularly like crysis.
>>
File: 1209494668339.jpg (435 KB, 1280x960)
435 KB
435 KB JPG
>>11288236
>No it doesn't. You have 80+ processes running. It probably takes you twice as long to load stuff. inb4BUTIDON'TNEEDITFASTER, don't bullshit, there's no point in having something run slower if you can help it. If not, optimization wouldn't exist.
Just to experiment, I opened a 720p episode of anime, then one of my larger .doc files. Both loaded in around two seconds. I guess that means you can shave a WHOLE SECOND off the loading time - considering I may open up to ten episodes of anime a day and twenty .doc files, THAT MEANS I'M WASTING HALF A MINUTE OF MY LIFE A DAY! The most memory intensive thing I do other than booting up is shifting files around, and I can do other things whilst waiting for that to finish.

>I'm going to college right now, and do use several memory intensive (most of the adobe master collection, .net, etc) programs at once.
All right, fair point. The point I was making was that I don't, I guess I just phrased it badly.

>Well, neither do I, but I don't find it necessary to run 80 processes for no reason.
I don't find it necessary to spend the time learning what I need and what I don't need. Taking a quick glance at what I've got running I can spot at least ten instantly that don't need to be there, but why bother doing anything about them? My door sticks when it's wet, but I don't see the need to have one side of it sanded down.

>Attacking the same invalid point from the same angle multiple times in succession does not constitute a good argument.
>Yes it does.
Come on, you were making intelligent points up until that line.
>>
You guys just shut the fuck up for christ's sake. No one gives a fuck about your optimization and your "I'm smarter than you" bullshit. It's like arguing with a bunch of goddamn women. Sage this shit.
>>
>>11288555

The 9800GX2 and 9800GTX are the only cards right now that can run Crysis with max settings, DX10, 1920x1200, at barely 41FPS.

8800s can barely run Crysis at any more than 35FPS with max settings, no AA, and 1024x768, DX9.

Don't bullshit. It's not possible with 8800s. It was already proven.
>>
>>11288684

And to add on to this, SLI with Crysis is fucking shit. You get a 5% increase in performance. That's it.
>>
>>11288636
Saging a thread to reach the bump limit stopped working a while back, and they're completely ignoring what's going on with the rest of the thread so shitting it up won't help. I fail to see the point.

sage because this post isn't worth bumping the thread for.
>>
>>11288705
want me to get a screencap? I'll reinstall and get it ready for you in 15 minutes.
>>
File: 1209495444788.png (1024 KB, 1024x768)
1024 KB
1024 KB PNG
>>
>>11288584
>>11288236
>Just to experiment, I opened a 720p episode of anime, then one of my larger .doc files. Both loaded in around two seconds. I guess that means you can shave a WHOLE SECOND off the loading time - considering I may open up to ten episodes of anime a day and twenty .doc files, THAT MEANS I'M WASTING HALF A MINUTE OF MY LIFE A DAY! The most memory intensive thing I do other than booting up is shifting files around, and I can do other things whilst waiting for that to finish.
>A 720p mkv isn't exactly world breaking.

>I don't find it necessary to spend the time learning what I need and what I don't need. Taking a quick glance at what I've got running I can spot at least ten instantly that don't need to be there, but why bother doing anything about them? My door sticks when it's wet, but I don't see the need to have one side of it sanded down.
>It takes approximately 5-10 minutes after a (in my case 6-monthly) format to turn off the unneccessary processes and services, even when having to google some of them. The first month or so after that I check my boot settings about weekly, after that monthly. It takes about 20 seconds each time.
>>
>>11288730

To up the performance, patch it too, and get that configuration that allows better effects.
I forgot the name, but just get a screencap of your 60FPS.
>>
>>11288730
How will that show the FPS you're getting?
>>
WE
DON'T
FUCKING
CARE
>>
>>11288759

r_displayinfo 1 in console or some shit, and then screencap it.
>>
Please excuse the ignorance, but how does one screenshot the desktop?
>>
>>11288780

PrtScreen on Windows.

Should be next to your Scroll Lock key on most keyboards.
>>
>>11284757
Fail for not having DOSBox.
>>
>>11288791
Don't listen to him.

Use a film camera, then print it out, scan it, print THAT out, take a photo of it, trace it using a tablet, make it into an animated gif that flips it back and forth, leave that on your screen while you render it by hand in fine oil pigments, eat the painting, shit it out, smear it over your face, go to a sticker photo booth and get a photo taken, take a photo of THAT photo with a digital camera, make sure it's a 3mb .PNG file, then upload it here.
>>
>>11288791
when i hit it nothing happens...
>>
Holy shit. A lot of you assholes need to get something better than AVG. It's like using paper to stop gamma radiation.
>>
>>11288753
>A 720p mkv isn't exactly world breaking.
See
>I use my PC for writing essays, watching anime and listening to music

A 720p mkv is about as "world breaking" as it gets with me. If I did have to run all the software you need/choose to, I'd probably take your advice and optimise/upgrade my PC.


>It takes approximately 5-10 minutes after a (in my case 6-monthly) format to turn off the unneccessary processes and services, even when having to google some of them. The first month or so after that I check my boot settings about weekly, after that monthly. It takes about 20 seconds each time.

It'd take me 5-10 minutes to sandpaper my door.
>>
>>11288845

Please kill yourself for the sake of humanity.
>>
>>11288845
Open up MS Paint and paste nigger.
>>
>>11284757
Over 100 fucking posts and I don't even know what you're trying to show off.
>>
File: 1209496081878.jpg (170 KB, 1602x902)
170 KB
170 KB JPG
>>11288845
Open mspaint, hit Ctrl+V.
>>
>>11288861
THEN SAND IT YOU LAZY FUCK

as a note, downloading the crysis patch
>>
File: 1209496496717.jpg (168 KB, 1280x1024)
168 KB
168 KB JPG
this are mine.
>>
bah, just remembered my new monitor's 1680*1050, as opposed to my old 1280*1024, so I'll probably get less fps. I'll run it at both resolutions once.
>>
File: 1209496568871.jpg (242 KB, 1280x1024)
242 KB
242 KB JPG
5k interweb dollars to anyone who can guys which anime this wall is from
>>
>>11288942
>YOU LAZY FUCK

All right, I haven't got a comeback for that. Argument over.
>>
>>11288998
I saw the top half and thought 5cm/s but I don't recognise the bottom half.

Stab in the dark here, but GiTS 2?
>>
File: 1209496775036.jpg (132 KB, 1280x1024)
132 KB
132 KB JPG
>>
File: 1209496781349.jpg (547 KB, 1280x1024)
547 KB
547 KB JPG
>>11288998
>>
File: 1209496791513.jpg (325 KB, 1680x1050)
325 KB
325 KB JPG
>>11288483
I can.
>>
File: 1209496855547.jpg (725 KB, 1280x800)
725 KB
725 KB JPG
>>
>>11288986

What's that bottom bar? It's a cool feature.
>>
File: 1209496897771.jpg (194 KB, 1280x1024)
194 KB
194 KB JPG
rofl coptas
>>
>>11289074
>What's that bottom bar? It's mac-like memory hogging faggotry.
Fixed.
>>
File: 1209496984243.jpg (55 KB, 521x426)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>11289057
>crysis
>>
File: 1209496997490.jpg (140 KB, 1280x1024)
140 KB
140 KB JPG
>>
File: 1209497165817.jpg (188 KB, 1280x1024)
188 KB
188 KB JPG
>>11288986
sorry bout that everyone, i fail.
>>
File: 1209497191826.jpg (99 KB, 1024x768)
99 KB
99 KB JPG
Seriously defective.
>Winamp
>Just the best of dance, trance, club & techno.

Wtf, nigga.
>>
>>11289148
>internet exploder
>winamp
...
>>
>>11289053
Is this right? I need to know.
>>
File: 1209497437747.jpg (597 KB, 1280x800)
597 KB
597 KB JPG
>>
>>11289225
damn yer desktop's a mess, get organized.
>>
>>11289225
>Firefox
>Windows Media Player

This gentleman is very cult and knows what he is doing.
>>
File: 1209497567885.jpg (214 KB, 1280x1024)
214 KB
214 KB JPG
though it seems people care more about what's playing in my media player at the moment
>>
File: 1209497706694.jpg (268 KB, 1024x768)
268 KB
268 KB JPG
Boring laptop.
>>
File: 1209497707965.png (246 KB, 1280x1024)
246 KB
246 KB PNG
WHere is your god now!? And I'm still not done overclocking so I have the Ultimate Internet Rape Machine
>>
File: 1209497771055.png (86 MB, 1280x800)
86 MB
86 MB PNG
oh hay thar desktop thread.
>>
>>11289298
Failure, on account of "duo" core. I has a quad core.
>>
File: 1209497908545.jpg (279 KB, 1280x1024)
279 KB
279 KB JPG
here's the screen, inb4b& for /v/ on /a/
>>
>>11289252
http://youtube.com/watch?v=xA8iot_0KaY perhaps?



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.