[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/a/


File: Untitled.jpg (15.42 KB, 202x254)
15.42 KB
15.42 KB JPG
Why is it okay to show this, but not show Ryuko, Mako or Satsuki's nipples?
>>
The same reason for all censorship: It's stupid and makes no sense.
>>
File: 1392077380605.png (872.06 KB, 1280x720)
872.06 KB
872.06 KB PNG
why
>>
what the fuck I thought that was a girl until now
>>
Japan doesn't censor kiddie dick because they don't consider it sexual or inappropriate, the same way most people here in the west don't see a reason to censor a girl toddler's chest. It's when it's matured enough to be seen as sexual that they decide to cover it up.
>>
Because representing child nudity in Japan is not stigmatized so long as it is humorous or otherwise non-sexual. Unlike America with their pedo-terror.
>>
>>102267132
>name ends in "rou"
>girl
>>
>>102267313
>>102267284
Isn't that just a matter of perception, though? A dick is a dick. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who find this sexual. Just because they shouldn't, doesn't mean they don't.
>>
>>102267132
>>
File: 1358705042991.gif (1.15 MB, 300x169)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB GIF
>>102267284
That's silly. "We will show a DICK because no one likes it. However, we won't show a NIPPLE because people do like it".
All of them are naughty parts, if you're not censoring one, then why censor the other?
I'm sure they know how beneficial a topless Ryuko would be to their views.
>>
>>102267398
Some people might find hair sexual.

Better censor everyone's hair from now on.

You're so fucking dumb.
>>
Because little boy peepees are funny. You wouldn't laugh at a woman's nipples, would you?
>>
>>102267581
I like how in missing the point completely you have just ended up supporting my point.
>>
File: Spoiler Image (169.53 KB, 1280x720)
169.53 KB
169.53 KB JPG
But they did show Ryuko's nipples.
>>
>>102267654
What's funny about a child's dick?
>>
>>102267654
>You wouldn't laugh at a woman's nipples
I have and I will again.
>>
>>102267514
>All of them are naughty parts
Well, that's like, totally your opinion.
>>
>>102266957
DIfferent cultural values fuckhead.

That being said, you want me to explain just how fucking wrong you are?
Because it is plot related why they don't have exposed genitals and nipples.
>>
>>102267132
For fucks sake dude.
Why do people think the clothes make him a girl? From the first time I saw him I understood that he wears his raggedy ass getup because his family is broke as shit.

Those probably ARE girl clothes, because they probably had to give him Mako's old clothes despite Matarou being a boy.
>>
>>102267932
>Because it is plot related
You mean to imply the need for the Life Fibres to cover the body to fufill their purpose?
So how then is it okay to show the body in the lewdest possible way, but not omit the nipple?
You haven't really thought this through, have you?
>>
>>102267132
Kill yourself
>>
File: nipples.png (822.76 KB, 1280x720)
822.76 KB
822.76 KB PNG
>>102267284
No, it's because Japan finds little boy dicks funny.
The same reason the west finds butts funny.

It's not a big deal when his dick is shown as a visual gag, it would be a big deal if Sukuyo started to /ss/ and touched him there.
Or if Matarou had a boner.

In a less sexual example, it's the same reason Saitama is bald. Because it looks silly. That's it.

>>102268098
Fuck you, you're the one who doesn't know what they're talking about.
I'm going to be posting multiple pictures to prove my point, but look at this one.
Notice how Ragyo has nipples in this shot.
>>
File: Exposed.png (593.07 KB, 1280x720)
593.07 KB
593.07 KB PNG
>>102268098
And notice here how she does not.
>>
>>102268367
She has a nipple bump, very slight. Wow.
Also , your point is completely fucking moot considering at no point did I say "why can't they show nipples in their kamui?". I simply meant in the whole show. Fucking moron, learn to read.
>>
>>102268470
You need to be more patient you fuck

>>102268098
The point being,
>>
>>102268098
That when a user fuses with a Kamui, they are no longer human.

They become fused with their clothing, the covered parts aren't covered, they're the fabric of a kamui replacing the wearers skin.
Likewise the wearer fills in the missing gaps of a Kamui when activated.

They don't show nipples and pussy lips because they don't have nipples and vaginas when fused.
>>
>>102268703
Read my post again you stupid faggot. At no point did I say why can't they show nipples in their kamui. I mean in this show in general.
>>
>>102268791
>You mean to imply the need for the Life Fibres to cover the body to fufill their purpose? So how then is it okay to show the body in the lewdest possible way, but not omit the nipple? You haven't really thought this through, have you?

Now you're just moving the goal post.

But if you want to pretend like you've won some sort of argument by changing what you're arguing. It's the same reason Sensei wears a speedo despite being a nudist.
>>
>>102268367
..Yeah, Japan okay's lil boy peen because it's not sexual or so as long as it's not put into a sexual context. It just happens to be funny, too.
You're sorta agreeing with me here, unless I'm dense and misunderstanding.
>>
>>102268984
That wasn't the original point. Attempting to belittle me to avoid the original point and insert your own over the top doesn't make you right, but if you want to feel that way, go ahead.
>>
In KLK universe only men have nipples.
>>
>>102269028
I figured you were asking why they don't show nipples on Kamui fusions.

>>102269074
Fucking whatever.
Has your question been answered or not faggot?
That's all I'm fucking trying to do here.

If you're asking why they can't show nips in general, that's just because of censorship and the law. I reiterate, not showing all of the ladies bodies in KLK is the same reason sensei wears a speedo despite being a self proclaimed nudist.
>>
>>102269268
My point was, why is it okay to show a dick but not a girl's nipple? If you weren't busy crusading your strawman argument around you'd have already saw that 10 minutes ago
>>
>>102269335

>>102268367
>>102269268
>>102268984
>No, it's because Japan finds little boy dicks funny.
>The same reason the west finds butts funny.

>It's not a big deal when his dick is shown as a visual gag, it would be a big deal if Sukuyo started to /ss/ and touched him there.
>Or if Matarou had a boner.

>In a less sexual example, it's the same reason Saitama is bald. Because it looks silly. That's it.
>>
Because women don't want to rape little boys the same way men want to rape little girls.

It's not sexist, just look at the ratio of loli to shota threads (and even then, how many women are even in shota threads).
>>
>>102270225
I doubt most women would want to use 4chan in the first place.

I don't go there, obviously, but I heard that there's a lot of female shotacons on Tumblr.
>>
Little baby and children dicks have always been shown in japan, since the 60s. Goku showed it all the time in Dragon Ball. If a grown man's dick was showing it would be a completely different story.
>>
Do you think Ragyo was ever a hot-blooded, spirited girl like Ryuuko, before she discovered the first fiber?
>>
File: shin-chan_elephant.jpg (56.65 KB, 336x360)
56.65 KB
56.65 KB JPG
>>102267772
What isn't?
>>
Any chance of nips in a Blu-Ray release?
>>
File: 39348698.jpg (219.02 KB, 606x700)
219.02 KB
219.02 KB JPG
>>102270225
You speak too soon.
>>
>>102273303
There are.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.