[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/a/


All jokes aside, how fast would the US military forces take out Zvezda?
>>
They wouldn't.
>>
Faster than you can smoke a cigarette.
>>
I guess I have no choice but to masturbate.
>>
>implying Zvezda isn't sponsored by the NSA
>>
They have no forces trained to deal with little girls.
>>
Like 10 minutes?
>>
File: 1349418109126.jpg (54.95 KB, 407x480)
54.95 KB
54.95 KB JPG
>>101682232
>implying
>>
Depends. Kate is a superhuman.
>>
>>101682200
This.
>>
They'd be pretty slow.

Any missile/firepower requires chain of command and verification. Modern warfare is all about precision not random fights.
>>
>>101682309
This, these people aren't exactly normal humans
>>
Shitposting brigade.
You are not retarded /a/non.
>>
>>101682232
Those "First Encounter Assault/Recon" dudes tried it. 'course, they let everybody die and come back as a zombie or whatever.
>>
What's the preparation time, acceptable collateral damage, and budget?
>>
>>101682309

>US millitary has trouble keeping a bunch of uneducated mudslimes throwing rocks in order

A loli that can literally deflect tank shells with one finger would shit on them.
>>
Didn't they already stop a nuke?
>>
>>101682308
>this is true because someone on 4chan photoshoped a picture
>>
>>101682309
Get the SCP Foundation then
>>
>>101682592
are you arguing that the US military doesn't know how to kill children?
>>
>>101682309
Superhuman doesn't mean she's immune to getting a nuke thrown in her face
>>
>>101682500
Lol a drone alone puts them in check. We have guys that can drink a cup a coffee while simultaneously bombing the shit out of those sand monkeys
>>
File: 1382030596740.png (377.21 KB, 850x828)
377.21 KB
377.21 KB PNG
The US military wouldn't attack children, would they?
>>
>>101683923
They would, they would also shot them in the legs, torture and rape them.
>>
>>101684016
They would do everything except the rape.
They think that alone would make them evil, while everything is fine. Killing a child is nothing compared to, for example, licking a little girl's vagina in the eyes of american pigs. The latter is true evil itself.
>>
>>101684080
They could rape the boys, it would be really rape.
>>
>>101684122
*it wouldn't be
>>
>>101683923
It's a country that has no qualms in using drones on kids and their president makes jokes about it on live TV. Of course they would.
>>
>>101684016
you're mistaking those savages for glorious master race nipponjin
>>
>>101682096
Depends, I highly doubt we'd invade all of japan with everything we got to fuck up a small street gang equivalent of shitty super villains with retard super powers that are probably powered by fairies..

If we knew exactly where they were and threw everything we had at them like the airforce and the fucking marines they'd probably be gone within and afternoon. I don't think anyone would deem that a reasonable response though.
>>
>>101684080
I'm not a pig, you better watch your tongue boy
>>
The US military (just like any military or PMC, really, aside from organizations based on fanatical indoctrination - they wouldn't violate the doctrine unless under very, very severe pressure) would attack children, as they would torture them if need arises.
Anything that makes easier to win battle/war is permitted. From this PoV, rape is useless because it serves zero purpose to bringing victory closer, while having a very real risk of public upheaval. Torture, however, may reveal a lot of valuable info, so it's fine. Shooting the limbs, as well as overkilling is fine, because it makes your opponent weaker.
"Professional, reliable, efficient" - this is the motto of every (smart) warmongerer, and if one of these has to go, it would be "professional", and not "efficient". No one would commit war atrocities without having any sort of benefit in clear mind.
>>
>want to rid the world of smokers

why would the US stop them again?

please rid the world of niggers and sand niggers next Kate. The world will eventually become a fusion of asians/whites and we can all live happily ever after.
>>
drop another nuke

the end
>>
>>101685273
Are you retarded?
Do you even know how much money is in smoking for the whole US?
>>
>>101685344
how much money goes into treating the effects of smoking?
>>
>>101685236
>Torture, however, may reveal a lot of valuable info, so it's fine.
Research shows that the tortured only tell what the torturers want to hear, not necessarily anything truthful.
>>
>>101685435
Yeah, well, that's true.
There is really no reliable method of influence on an individual, unless you know his biographical details, and thus is able to deduce what you should apply pressure to.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.