[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/a/


File: maxhype.jpg (113.37 KB, 1024x768)
113.37 KB
113.37 KB JPG
The general consensus when it comes to Sword art Online and Shingeki no Kyojin on /a/ is that they are both very overrated but that Sword Art is better than Shingeki.

I hope this lets you realize just how shit the opinion of this board is.
>>
Cool opinion. You must be proud to have such an opinion.
>>
At least Sword art Online was fun to watch, attack on faggots wasn't even that
>>
>>101346264
Sword art online was painful to watch. Kirito is one of the worst shounen MCs, even worse than Touma.
>>
What do you expect? /a/ is full of barely functioning autists, of coarse they'd like the shitty show where they get to live in a video game with their loving waifu over the slightly better written shit.
>>
Sword Art is an otaku wish fulfillment show. It's the otaku male version of twilight, not just as a comparison but down to the very fine details it copies almost everything twilight does for a male otaku audience down to the details in specific examples.

Of course /a/ would love it.

Shingeki on the other hand is overrated but only slightly overrated. It's like Final Fantasy VI. Most of the hate comes from the fan base which doesn't reflect on the quality of the show. For what it is it's pretty well done, enough so to get George R R martin and Del Toro to praise it.
>>
Are faggots for 2 shit shows literally fighting it out for who has the least shit?

I'm in.
>>
>>101347198
>Of course /a/ would love it.

What is the definition of fun?
>>
Both have mainstream appeal, that's what.

>mfw I got asked to promote both series at the next big-scale convention
>>
/a/ liking SAO?
/a/ liking Titan Shit?

Get your facts strait, most people on /a/ hate both shows.
>>
>>101347198
But /a/ hates SAO.
>>
Kirito was WAY too over powered...and the exact definition of a "Larry Stu"

also
"faster faster gotta go faster!!"
(only thing I can remember he ever said)
>>
File: tmp_kk2140470794.png (175.74 KB, 1205x535)
175.74 KB
175.74 KB PNG
>>
File: react12.jpg (16.24 KB, 250x250)
16.24 KB
16.24 KB JPG
>>101347826
>Kirito was WAY too over powered

this
that series was shit
only 12 year olds or autists enjoyed Kirito's charater
>>
>>101346061
SAO is not better than Shingeki. They are both shit, but SAO is definitely the shittier of the two.
>>
>>101346940
>>101347198
>speaking of /a/ in the third person
>implying you're not /a/
>>
Are you fucking kidding me? SnK anime wasn't that good and Eren is a faggot but at least it has a good manga and the other characters are good.

SAO is literally otaku pandering shit in every way possible and even the LN's are horrible.
>>
SAO has a deviantart-tier characters and story
SnK has Tumblr-tier characters and story
>>
>>101346378
Animeonly fag spotted
>>
Yeah, that's why you should get the fuck out as soon as possible before our shit taste infects you.
>>
>>101346061
just report and move on fellow anons.
>>
both are flawed as fuck and extremely overhyped.
SAO has a shitty MC who can best be described as "gary-stu".
SnK MC's only personality trait is always being angry.
SAO is basicly someone's first fanfic (or webnovel), SnK is someone's first manga.
Personally, I think SnK is better than SAO.
Both are flawed and make a lot of mistakes, but SnK fucks up less than SAO.
>>
>>101346061
SAO main problem it's not being bad, it's being shallow,which is even worse because it means you are not even trying..
Just take Asuna as example.
>>
>>101347665
>>101347767
But /a hates everithing.
Give me an example of what /a/ doesn't hate
>>
File: 1389407043591.jpg (46.60 KB, 500x720)
46.60 KB
46.60 KB JPG
>>101346061
This is incorrect.
The general consensus is that both are shit and that Eotania is better than Edginess online.
It isn't even possible to have a SAO discussion outside of edgy's imouto. Atleast the shingeki threads are usually 100+ threads full of shitposting about Jean and shipping.
>>
SAO itself is completely worthless but it has some great porn.

SnK has nothing. The winner is clear
>>
the only decent thing about sao are the first 13 episodes

at least snk was interesting despite it's shitty pacing and had a great soundtrack
>>
>>101348835
jojo
boku no pico
K-on
>>
I enjoyed SAO more. SnK just...tries too hard. SAO at least knows to have fun later on and enjoys a MMO in a way it should be.
>>
>>101348835
Kino no Tabi.
Yuyu Yuri.
D-Flag
Sora No woto
Jinrui
Desert Punk
Azumanga Daioh
>>
>>101348986
This, SAO at least has cute girls and good hentai doujinshi.
>>
>>101346061
obvious (low-quality) IRC bait. try harder next time.
>>
>>101346061
Stop samefagging your own thread, the bait will not work.
>>
Where are the mods when they are needed the most?
>>
Mostly people love to shit on them because they're popular. If they were relatively unknown and sold like shit you'd have seen everyone here bitching about how everyone are retarded for not seeing these great shows. Just the way of things really. I'd say SAO is worse than SnK though, it had some great visuals and a fun concept but the writing was pretty dogshit especially in the second half. Both were still solid entertainment and I enjoyed them while they aired, but not really anything to write home about. Anyone who calls them "shit" though is either just trying to fit in or has only watched a very small amount of shows and has yet to see any real shit.

The real shit nobody bothers to call shit, and they certainly don't get into arguments about it. The real shit is self-evident, and there's no need to even say so unless someone actually comes out and asks, because it's just stating the obvious. Certainly they don't write big lists justifying why it's shit, like both of these shows got ad nauseum while they were airing.
>>
>>101349377
it's called trolling, anon
>>
In SnK, the characters are there to serve the story.
In SAO, it's the other way around.
>>
File: H3H3H3.png (712.53 KB, 1814x874)
712.53 KB
712.53 KB PNG
>>101349554
There's nothing particularly wrong with a story being there to serve the characters. Pic related managed it pretty well.
>>
>>101349505
What's an anon?
>>
File: 1384649836569.png (95.64 KB, 250x250)
95.64 KB
95.64 KB PNG
I hope you realize that both are awful fucking shows.
>>
>>101349731
But they're not. They're both slightly on the upper side of mediocre, at least as good as most of the stuff you're probably watching this season.
>>
>>101349629
It does get annoying when almost every event in the story is used to make one single character look even better.
>>
>>101347826
>larry stu

what is that?
>>
>>101349813
There is mary-sue, gary-stu and marty stu.
I guess larry is their long lost sibling from another dimension
>>
>>101346061
You sound gay
>>
>>101349797
Both are shounenshit, one of them just happens to be grimdark edgy shit making it even worse.
>>
File: To-Do List.gif (588.46 KB, 240x180)
588.46 KB
588.46 KB GIF
>>101349731
>"SAO and SnK is SO BAD GUYZ"
>Post shit character from a shit series that is far worse than TTGL and probably at the same scale as SAO
>>
File: 1330030237829.jpg (34.03 KB, 613x531)
34.03 KB
34.03 KB JPG
>>101350024
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Sue

>"Other variations include Gary Stu, Larry Stu, Mary Joe, or Marty Sam."

its all the same fucking thing you autist
>>
>>101350240
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Marty-Stu

theres another
done with spoon feeding you faggots
>>
>>101350240
Did you really take that post literally?



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.