There's something inherently ironic about a show that so heavily panders to lolicons attacking smokers for being harmful to society.
Why can't this be the real world ;_;
I don't think you know what irony is
>there's something inherently ironic
no, there's not. that's the creepy part of this show.
>loli haet smokers
Just more anti-smoking propaganda, yay...
Ssssh. Shut up. Shhhhhh!
Did you seriously just imply that lolicons are harmful to society?
I'll leave lolicons alone and move straight to the hard part: pedophiles are harmless to society. Unless you use some form of law-enforcement definition (though I don't think that there are any official law definitions of pedophilia, they usually talk of "Child Sexual Abuse" aka "CSA"), pedophilia something purely limited to thoughts. Thoughts cannot be inherently harmful.
Not only that, it's also highly dubious whether pedophilia is an illness or abnormal in any way:
So your sentence makes just about as much sense as
>There's something inherently ironic about a show that so heavily panders to homosexuals attacking smokers for being harmful to society.
I don't think there's such a thing as second-hand loli, so I'd say it's less harmful than smoking.
Tolerating pedophilia but not smoking is the definition of irony
If you ever left the basement you'd know how annoying those faggots are.
>pedophilia something purely limited to thoughts
>Lolicons are pedophiles.
Now you just went full-retard.
Read >>101104809 then fuck off of /a/ and better keep your voice down where ever you go.
It seems you think there is a difference between the two.
Although, I'm not sure why I'm bothering, there are so many lolicons on this board that they manage to convince each other that being sexually attracted to children isn't wrong nor harmful to society.
I was implying that I would like to live in a world where being a lolicon was more socially acceptable than smoking.
Keep telling yourself there is a difference if it helps you sleep at night.
Well, that -should- exist god damn it. Fuck this gay earth.
Aren't they different but overlap sometimes?
Dammitall here we go again with this shit. You assholes are gonna attract dubs-spammers and shit with this bullshit. Talk about the fucking show and stop with your shitty opinions that nobody actually gives a flying shit about for fucks sakes!
I'm the "no" reply
It has nothing to do with whether or not lolicons are harmful to society
You simply don't understand what irony is
An example of irony is a fire house burning down, maybe that will help you
There's a much larger problem here
WHERE THE FUCK ARE THE FFF SUBS?
Leave the board and don't come back.
Also, I'm more pedophile than lolicon, so you're telling that to the wrong person.
Probably. Equating them is just stupid though.
They're still figuring out what lines to edit memes into
FFF is slow on all of their shows. Give up and use someone else.
>they manage to convince each other that being sexually attracted to children isn't wrong nor harmful to society.
As a matter of diagnostic medicine, it doesn't become a problem until you add the word "predominately" attracted to children.
>Give up and use someone else.
>[HorribleSubs] Sekai Seifuku - Bouryaku no Zvezda - 03 [720p].mkv
>[Cthuko] Sekai Seifuku Bouryaku no Zvezda - 03 [720p H264 AAC][0CA83751].mkv
I think I can wait a little longer
>Implying a pedophiles opinion is valid
Do you expect anyone to take you seriously?
What's wrong with HS?
>Being attracted to X is harmful to society
Yes mein Furher, without these subhuman scum society would flourish with prosperity.
Don't expect for people to talk about the actual show until saturday.
My father and uncle are fairly heavy smokers, and I've been around plenty of smokers. It's not a big deal even in public as long as they're far enough away from doors and windows.
>durr it smell bad and makes me cough!
Grow up. Second hand smoke isn't even any worse for you than driving on the freeway with your windows down.
Nothing, he just like his epic memes in his anime.
I doubt there would be any flourishing, but there would be a lot less child raping.
>This is the only argument normals can use
>driving on the freeway with your windows down
People do this?
If you can get past the sleazy designs, this show's actually pretty damn funny.
>I take it up the ass so much I don't even feel it anymore. Why are you guys complaining about taking it up the ass
I think they're cute. And General Skeleton is badass as fuck.
smokers have to
kill yourself twice as fast!
>not being attracted to children
>must be normal
Is that your definition of normal?
But isn't that image biased against the great normal master race in that it promotes degenerates like witches, communists, and pedophiles?
Air pollution is nothing new and second hand smoke is NOT that big a deal. There are already enough restrictions on smokers (designated smoking areas in public and not allowed within so many meters of doors and windows). There's no need to ban it entirely.
If you want it banned entirely, I want combustion engines banned entirely because I hate it when I'm out running and cars drive by spewing exhaust near me.
>not enjoying it up the butt
Lolis or not this show fucking sucked since episode 1.
Any information on when FFF plans to sub the newest episode?
Your mom sucked last night.
>The main heroine/MC of the show is a little girl
>It must be for lolicons!
I swear to god one day will say anything that has male characters are for fujoshi
I see you haven't been on this board for long.
You better leave now.
Or stay and learn to accept that there's nothing wrong with pedophilia itself.
That text is quite badly written, but I guess you can't expect everyone to read gallons of proper psychology literature or do their own research on the topic.
How are drawings wrong?
>Go to Las Vegas with brother and his friends last year for his bachelor party
>6 hours of driving, all smokers, with the windows rolled up
>Ever since I've had an on and off nasty cough that I never had before
>Have never smoked once in my life
Are you sure you're not a pussy?
Not him, but it's scantily clad lolies. If they made a show about scantily clad men, we'd call it fujoshit. Oh wait, Free aired, didn't it?
Sexual contact with an underdeveloped child is going to cause them problems later in life when they are trying to develop a relationship. Now, if you start a relationship with some 14 year old girl, actually love her, and eventually get married. Fine, that really isn't going to cause any issues. But most pedos who act on their urges don't do that. They take advantage of a child and toss them aside when they get bored of them. If your first sexual experience was with someone 10+ years older than you, and they did nothing but take advantage of you, do you honestly think it wouldn't cause some sort of trauma? There are grey areas in life, and I can't say that every situation results in trauma, but don't try to convince yourself that a fucking relationship with a 30 year old man as a 14 year old girl wont cause issues. A big part of your sexual identity comes from growing up, and that means developing romantic relationships with your peers. A child whose first sexual experience was with someone who was close to their age, will be a lot better off than one who was raped by some old man. Stop trying to rationalize potentially ruining some kid to satisfy your urges.
It's cancer. You're going to die. That's what you get for leaving the house.
Why the fuck didn't you make them knock that shit off? Or at least roll down the window.
Did you even ask them to stop?
As for the cough, you should get that checked out.
onion.to seems broken, better working links:
Just use HorribleSubs.
Stop pushing your child-raping, pedophilic view on me, pig
>trying to give him eye cancer
That's messed up, man.
Cthuko already did their release and it's... passable.
Avoid HS for this show like the plague.
>Go to Disney World
>In water park area.
>Have to walk through crowd of smokers to get to slide
Fuck those faggots.
Are you going to post Zvezda and/or loli soon or should I leave?
That is the third time you've said that, and the amount of time I've spent on this board is irrelevant because at no point in my life will I ever say that pedophilia is harmless. Furthermore, if you've learned anything from this board, you've got to be a bigger idiot than I originally thought you were. This is a place to discuss a hobby, not a place for you to vent your sexual frustrations about not being able to touch children.
Isn't 99% of Disney World a non-smoking area? I think Disneyland is like that.
Why is Florida so shit?
>Sexual contact with an underdeveloped child is going to cause them problems later in life when they are trying to develop a relationship.
You're pulling that out of your ass. (Rather, from conventional knowledge, which is wrong. Fifty years ago we thought homosexuality killed people.)
>Now, if you start a relationship with some 14 year old girl, actually love her, and eventually get married. Fine, that really isn't going to cause any issues.
>and get married
Are you a fundamentalist Christian, or just a retarded Murrican?
>But most pedos who act on their urges don't do that. They take advantage of a child and toss them aside when they get bored of them.
Again pulling things out of your ass. Or statistics on *jailed* pedophiles. Go make some statistics on *any* group of people in prison, like homosexuals in prison, Christians in prison, or My Little Pony fans in prison, and you'll find similar results and draw similarly retarded conclusions on them being innately bad people.
>If your first sexual experience was with someone 10+ years older than you, and they did nothing but take advantage of you, do you honestly think it wouldn't cause some sort of trauma?
Depends a hell lot on the situation. Many psychologists who manage to get rid of their prejudices realize that most harm to children is caused by the social stigma and not the sexual contact itself. It's exactly people like YOU who cause children to become traumatized. Let that sink for a while.
Will answer to rest in separate post because 2000 character limit.
I'll sound like I'm defending the lolicons here But believe me I'm not but that reasoning didn't stop people from calling guys who like Non non byori lolicons.
/a/ just like labeling people and shows hastily based on one small fact.
>rapists like naked women
>Natasha is pretty much naked
>The show panders to rapists
>people on /a/ who watches this show are rapists
Are you crazy? No one is going to read that.
>Loli says smoking is bad
B-but I picked up smoking because Ichigo Mashimaro made it look so cool.
HS is still better than FFF.
>on a site started by an underaged faggot who wanted to discuss loli with his SA goon buddies but wasn't allowed to on SA itself
4chan is a lolicon site, deal with it, normalfags.
But pedophiles aren't harmful to society in the least. It has been proven that child molesters are usually not even pedophiles, they either are too weak/ugly to get with/rape an adult woman, or have power fantasies. I know you people don't believe in newfangled inventions like "psychology" or "scientific studies", but that doesn't make those things false, it just makes you an idiot.
Let's talk about Kate's legs.
Those outlines look real thick solid and tight. Good job.
Cruncyroll devs pls go
Seriously, fuck you. HS should be subs of last resort.
>/a/ still uses the word lolicon as pedophile
>not a label for faggots who like kids on their shows
Technically lolicon IS indeed pedophile. But on /a/ it's become more of a title than anything. /a/ lolicons just want to see kids doing kid things in their show. There's a lot of difference in that than wanting to shiggie kids in real life.
Of course I'm not saying everyone is pure. There might be some out there that does want to shiggie kids, but the gist is not all /a/ lolicons does.
>telling people to avoid HS
>There are grey areas in life, and I can't say that every situation results in trauma, but don't try to convince yourself that a fucking relationship with a 30 year old man as a 14 year old girl wont cause issues.
It probably won't, if the guy is an OK person. I don't see why it should, the burden of proof lies on you. And don't pull some emotional shit out of your ass that's just a formulation of the prejudices you've built up so far in life, give some actual substance. You won't be able to, though.
>A big part of your sexual identity comes from growing up, and that means developing romantic relationships with your peers. A child whose first sexual experience was with someone who was close to their age, will be a lot better off than one who was raped by some old man.
You're fucking retarded. Why are you comparing someone who had a healthy relationship with someone of their age to someone who got raped by an old person? Are you saying you can't get raped by people your age? Are you saying old people are incapable of sympathy?
>Stop trying to rationalize potentially ruining some kid to satisfy your urges.
Stop being a prejudiced bigot and realize that your culture is what causes probably millions of children to get traumatized for life.
Note that actual physical abuse/rape is something different. You can rape an adult, you can rape a child. You can make love to an adult, you can make love to a child (often in more limited ways though since penetration might be impossible due to physical size of the orifice).
I'm talking in a way that's going to make you seriously angry, mostly to get the attention of the bystanders because I probably can't make you change your mind anyway, but try to read what I'm saying by ignoring my obnoxious tone if you want, it could be useful to you and children around you.
Lolicons don't cause cancer.
Only suicide and rape
FFF is bad though.
You're arguing with social norms anon, those don't change just because they're founded on bullshit. Just because there wasn't a Roman census 2014 years ago doesn't mean people don't expect you to believe in a magic man who wants you to kill gay people.
You're the one who is pulling things out your ass. Yes, the people trying to tell a child that an adult taking advantage of them are the ones who are wrong. Not the ones who actually took advantage of them. Wouldn't the world be a better place if we were all blissfully ignorant, and you could touch as many children as you wanted without fear of reprisal? Your argument is never going to be valid. Your motivated strictly by your own selfish interests, so stop acting like you give a shit about children. If you didn't want them to be traumatized, you wouldn't touch them in the first place. It doesn't really matter which side causes the trauma, if your actions result in a child being traumatized, regardless of whether it was your fault or not, any decent human being would simply not touch a child.
Also, at the end of the day, I can satisfy my sexual urges without having to do anything illegal, or risk going to prison. Keep that in mind.
Why are you still here? Will you leave the board already?
And yes, I understand that you're incapable of holding a debate and will just resort to your retarded pre-established prejudices and bigoted cultural norms. This board is not a place to display that kind of idiocy though. You can discuss anime in different places if you want that.
Yes, about smoker hates. Although a safe choice for denying the both smokers and anti-smokers.
HS is usually the superior subs though.
>You're the one who is pulling things out your ass.
Read the links I've already given above you piece of retarded shit and just shut your mouth. I won't even respond to the rest of your post because it's too much below my standards.
Fourth time, still not leaving.
I feel like your entire argument is based on thinking that if society thinks something is wrong, it must be right. So you're a hipster faggot and a pedophile?
Dear animu kamisama,
I wish it's next episode already and we can move on with our lives and talk about Natasha and Plamya and not these self-righteous smokers and lolicons.
While I'm on it, Japan is a culture that has gods for almost anything. I wonder if they have a designated god for animu. I mean a "real" supernatural one.
No they're not, they're fine.
Nope. Crunchyroll subs range from mediocre to awful.
>It's not normal so it's wrong
Read the fucking links anon, everything you've said in your post has been proven false multiple times by modern science, you know something that is not just pulled out of your ass.
>Fourth time, still not leaving.
Good, continue spending time on a board where everyone will hate you every time you open your mouth.
>I feel like your entire argument is based on thinking that if society thinks something is wrong, it must be right. So you're a hipster faggot and a pedophile?
This is so retarded I don't really have anything to say. It's not just not right, it's "not even wrong" as they say, because it's just too fucking retarded.
Read the links I've given, and do your own research.
I'm a paedophilic gentleman and a scholar.
That's not how Shinto works. Only natural things have spirits. Cars, for instance, don't have spirits. But rocks do.
Normalfag pls go, nobody gives a shit how many 3DPD you can bang.
There's a lot of ugly kids.
>That's not how Shinto works.
Oh, that makes sense I guess.
>Nope. Crunchyroll subs range from mediocre to awful.
Yes, yes of course. Go feel euphoric with your shitsubs then be confused on a plot/character detail as usual.
>panders to lolicons
I wasn't aware that something like pedophilia could be proven "right" by science. I really have no interest in reading that shit unless it's been used to successfully abolish the age of consent, which it hasn't. If you can't prove you are right to the rest of society, you sure as hell can't prove you are right to me.
I'm going to start by saying that I didn't read those links, so I don't know if that is proven false by modern science. If it is, it isn't going to matter to your average person. Even if science says it's perfectly natural, people will still say it's wrong because they feel uncomfortable about it.
>grew up with lots of younger siblings
>get over edgy teen phase of hating children and can see them for how adorable they are
>look like a typical neckbeard
>cousin's wife brings her two daughters over (ages 7 and 4) to my aunt's house while I'm visiting
>they come at 10am and I'm still sleeping on the couch in view of the front door
>she doesn't leave me alone with her children for even a second
>feel bad but still play with them because they're oblivious to anything but toys
>over time the mother gradually realizes I'm not a super scary pedo like from the news
>shave my beard
>now she doesn't act very nervous at all when I play with her daughters
>they think I'm great because I'll play with them and include them in whatever I'm doing (like video games or tabletop gaming or whatever)
It sucks that society is prejudiced against men that like children. I just think they're adorable and innocent.
Plus I'm only interested in 2D milf characters.
I already know Japanese, I don't need subs at all. FFF >> Crunchyroll shit translations.
Yes, which is why homosexuals can't marry, communists can't work, witches are burned at the stake, and blacks can't drink from the same water fountain as whites. Face it anon just because the idiots in society don't accept something doesn't mean much.
literally into /pol/ this thread goes.
>I wasn't aware that something like pedophilia could be proven "right" by science.
It can prove that under natural conditions, sexual contact doesn't harm children.
(Or rather, it can display the lack of proof that it *does* harm them, and conclude that it doesn't.)
>I really have no interest in reading that shit unless it's been used to successfully abolish the age of consent, which it hasn't.
So you'll just be a mindless bystander, or worse, a supporter of the conventional train of thought just because you're too retarded to read some stuff and make up your own mind? If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem. Homosexuality was "officially" considered a mental illness a couple decades ago, it was in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. At some point it got removed because people realized there was nothing fucking wrong with so-called "sodomy." The same thing will hopefully happen with paedophilia, but you can't guarantee it because prejudices of current society might just be *too* strong.
>If you can't prove you are right to the rest of society, you sure as hell can't prove you are right to me.
This is some seriously retarded, harmful way to think. If every person said "convince everyone else first," who is going to get convinced first? You have to go one-by-one, that's the only way it can happen. The fact that not many people in western cultures realized yet that pedophilia is harmless, doesn't mean it isn't harmless.
I find a feeling if the MC wasn't wearing an outfit like that, no one would complain as much.
They probably paid for those cigarettes and you got to sit there and smoke for free
What the fuck are you complaining about?
The people on this board are so entitled sometimes
(Actually, please omit such pointless redirections. The long-ass posts already stick out.)
If only you can actually transfer a whole post into the appropriate thread
When the only options are shit and shittier shit, I'll take shit, thank you very much.
The things you mentioned, and having sex with children are apples and oranges. Homosexuality doesn't hurt anyone, having a certain political ideology doesn't hurt anyone, witches don't exist, and racism is downright retarded. But raping a child can do harm to another person. I could find just as many studies that say pedophilia is harmful to children than hes found ones that say it isn't. You can find studies to prove anything on the internet, it's really not hard. So, in my opinion, in a situation like this, it's safer to just go with the flow and side with society.
le epic trole got me hart get the b8 m8 or whatever you guys say now.
What the fuck is that?
I highly doubt that, show me. Also, while I am a pedophile, I don't just "pluck kids off the street" like you think I would do. If I were to engage in any course of sexual activity, I'd probably just do something to make make her swoon over me, like every other guy would. And don't say children don't understand love. Because they do, in fact more children are fucking now more than ever. Other children, of course.
Anyone who says children grow up to have problems because they had sex with an adult has their logic flawed. And if they DO have problems because of it, it's because of assholes like you that say they were molested. And that's a pretty good buzzword. It'll make anyone feel bad, and then it'll mess them up.
This is defiantly going to bite me later, but I'm gonna take a chance anywho.
When I was around 7-8, my brother, who was in his teens got me into a shed and we blew eachother. It feel great, except for the part where he scratched my dick with his teeth by accident. And now, I'm 19. I'm not going around raping people, shooting up Schools, doing drugs, or any insane shit. I've thought about killing people. just for fun. But that slowly wore off with time and maturity. Now, I recent the fact that in Skyrim that I have to kill most of my enemies because I generally dislike killing, it's fun sure but makes me feel bad later. Such as thinking about the families of the bandit's and others I have to kill because they just get back up after they're down and resume attacking me, which is retarded The only thing that I was sent to a mental hospital for was for my anger, I have ADHD and ADD, not to mention the medicine I was on was making it worse. Doctors did NOT know what they were doing. Now that I've matured over the years,I've gotten pretty mellow. But it's people like you who grind my gears.
I'm human, like you.
I'm normal, like you.
Guys, srsly, pedophilia is wrong.
You'll go to prison. It's not nice.
You need to learn how to enjoy oppai. Pls.
So, you're saying that a factual truth is less important than a popular opinion? Because that's a pretty stupid and dangerous way of thinking, anon.
No, you won't go to prison if you tell people you find children sexually attractive. The situation is not *that* grave, at least. Almost though.
But homosexuals do rape people too.
Not all lolicons want to rape children. It's just a title for god's sake.
>Homosexuality doesn't hurt anyone, having a certain political ideology doesn't hurt anyone, witches don't exist, and racism is downright retarded.
Wow, zero out of four correct. That's fucking impressive.
In order: Homos spread STDs like crazy, bolshevism got millions of russians killed and caused the cold war, witches do exist but they can't do magic, and the races are largely distinct and have different characteristics, one of which is skin tone.
Homosexuality doesn't hurt anyone.
Pedophilia doesn't hurt anyone.
But for all of those cases of discrimination someone was "harmed", puritan villagers were "harmed" by witches, religious people were "harmed" by homosexual marriage, the American way of life was "harmed" by the communist spies on our soil, and the white society was "harmed" by blacks getting uppity.
Dude, I watched a guy ask for sauce on a "lewd and questionable" image go to prison. You think the FBI doesn't watch this website or you're not reported by someone who hates pedos.
Besides, you should just reform. Liking people your own age is pretty nice.
The western world failed to stop put a hold on teh gheys. Mark my words... lolicon/ped's will be next too seek & promote "normalization" since gheys already broke through and they leave a template for future lolicon/ped normalization campaigns.
>witches do exist
Shut up Beato!
You're not fooling me anymore.
I don't think you can say faggots aren't inherently harmful to society after the grammys
>My brother blew me when I was 7
>I'm normal, like you.
You're literally retarded if you think that.
Oh wait, you're a pedophile so you are.
Aside from that trollbait it's an alright show.
Reminds me of 'hurr NTRshit' from Nagi no Asukara.
Why would I have any reason to stick my neck out and support a group of people who, by societies standards, are harmful to children? Would you stick your neck out for me if I needed it, because I seriously doubt you would. I have absolutely no reason to support the age of consent being abolished, because I'm not attracted to children. You really haven't proven it's harmless, for every "source" you have I can counter with another "source" that says it is harmful.
The problem with your argument, and your goals, is it requires some people to face potentially ruining their lives (being labeled as a sex offender) in order for you to get what you want. Is that really fair?
I have absolutely no interest in changing the world, nor have you proven to me that pedophilia is harmless.
>not blowing your own brother
What kind of selfish jackass are you?
It's sad but I can see this happening in the near future.
>I already know Japanese, I don't need subs at all.
>FFF >> Crunchyroll shit translations.
>Dude, I watched a guy ask for sauce on a "lewd and questionable" image go to prison.
You've either been fooled, or the situation was different than what you say. (Did they directly ask a child for its nude pictures maybe? Or even encourage the child to take pictures while masturbating? Those would probably be crimes in most jurisdictions.)
>Besides, you should just reform. Liking people your own age is pretty nice.
I like people of my age too.
However, pedophilia seems to be an orientation just like homosexuality, so I don't think one has a choice or can change it.
>the American way of life was "harmed" by the communist spies on our soil, and the white society was "harmed" by blacks getting uppity.
McCarthy was right and cultural marxist infiltrators ARE damaging American culture and society through the media and academia.
Crime is most highly correlated to black and hispanic populations, not poverty, not anything else. The safest counties in America are white and rural.
Tell me how an abstract concept can physically hurt you and I will stop thinking of you as the shittiest tripfag on the board.
>The same thing will hopefully happen with paedophilia
It's slowly happening. The name "pedophilia" was changed to "pedophilic disorder" in DSM-5.
>what are wiccans
Seriously just please go away. You're annoying.
>Why would I help people who, by societies standards, are harmful?
>The problem with your argument, and your goals, is it requires some people to face potentially ruining their lives in order for you to get what you want. Is that really fair?
Because protests against jim crowe laws and being labeled a nigger lover were not at all disastrous to the people who showed up, and it's not like there weren't enough doctrines saying that blacks were inferior to whites for people to cite at the time either.
>Why would I have any reason to stick my neck out and support a group of people who, by societies standards, are harmful to children? Would you stick your neck out for me if I needed it, because I seriously doubt you would. I have absolutely no reason to support the age of consent being abolished, because I'm not attracted to children.
So you admit to being part of the problem. OK.
>by societies standards
when will you retards understand that throughout history, pretty much all societies have had gazillions of retarded standards? Racism used to be standard. Killing homosexuals used to be standard. Killing pedophiles used to be sta- oh wait, damnit
>You really haven't proven it's harmless, for every "source" you have I can counter with another "source" that says it is harmful.
Do so, I dare you. And you'll have to omit cases where the child has been physically abused, or mentally pressured into activity. And then contrast your findings to what the sources I gave say. And try really hard to not be prejudiced. You'll probably fail but whatever.
>The problem with your argument, and your goals, is it requires some people to face potentially ruining their lives (being labeled as a sex offender) in order for you to get what you want. Is that really fair?
Yes yes, I get it, you're a coward who can't stand up for other people's rights. You're content with your life as long as your ass is safe.
You're the absolute fucking scum of humanity.
>I have absolutely no interest in changing the world,
Interesting. Did you know how many thousands of children die every day from illness and starvation?
I know you didn't really meant to say what you said (or at least I REALLY hope so), I'm just showcasing here how shallow of a way of thinking you have in daily life.
>nor have you proven to me that pedophilia is harmless.
You have yet to prove it harmful. Do you know what "burden of proof" means?
The way you phrased makes it sound stupid.
Islam doesn't hurt anyone.
Heterosexuality doesn't hurt anyone.
The Government doesn't hurt anyone.
Mental Illness doesn't hurt anyone.
Can you libertarian so hard?
perfect lolis don't need to perform fanservice
>trying to relate your personal problems to the civil rights moment
An entire race of people being discriminated against is different than people not liking rapists.
Why didn't the smoker stick his cigarette in the loli's eye? She's a shit tier loli, Shinobu or Eva are better. It's a good thing she grows up and dies eventually.
>Islam doesn't hurt anyone.
Except when it literally tells you to kill people.
>Mental Illness doesn't hurt anyone.
Except that- What the fuck? A mental illness is harmful *by definition*. It wouldn't be called an illness if it didn't hurt anyone.
Are you comparing stringing up niggers to greasy fat dudes not being able to fuck third graders?
>All pedophiles are rapists
All blacks are thieves, murderers, and rapists too, not to mention they are unintelligent and steal whites jobs.
Stop feeding the troll. You should be ashamed of yourself. Just ignore him.
Neither the government nor mental illness are abstract concepts.
I'll give you a D- for the effort, though.
No, I saw the report. The "sauce" was the flag and then they investigated. Guess what they found at the end of the rabbit hole?
Pedophilia isn't a orientation. Homosexuality is an orientation. People aren't born pedophiles. Something damages them so they become pedophiles. Homosexuals are literally born that way.
>Except when it literally tells you to kill people.
Sorry, bro. Islam doesn't do the hurting. The people do.
>Except that- What the fuck? A mental illness is harmful *by definition*. It wouldn't be called an illness if it didn't hurt anyone.
No, no. It's apparently the people who are doing the hurting. Not any other factor.
Government as a concept would be better.
Again a single entity and not an abstract concept.
I am sure
cause I am pretty sure pedo mean you sexually like kids and refer nothing about your action based on your taste.
Cause rapist toward anyone is wrong
But they're not hurting people, are they? They're not physically shoving them down and beating them with their dick, are they?
>Pedophilia isn't a orientation. Homosexuality is an orientation. People aren't born pedophiles. Something damages them so they become pedophiles. Homosexuals are literally born that way.
Somewhere, there are people who actually believe this.
That has to be the dumbest post I've read on /a/ all day.
>Pedophilia isn't a orientation. Homosexuality is an orientation. People aren't born pedophiles. Something damages them so they become pedophiles. Homosexuals are literally born that way.
Except that the vast majority of homosexuals were sexually abused as minors which led to them becoming homosexuals as adults.
The Government is run by people, so it has the ability to do it.
And mental illness not hurting people? Are you fucking stupid or what?
>Except when it literally tells you to kill people.
>Sorry, bro. Islam doesn't do the hurting. The people do
So like, "wanting to have sex with kid" doesnt hurt anyone, those who rape the kids do
It's fine. Most of the time when you have a debate the point is to convince the bystanders, not the person you're debating with.
If there's a couple normalfags lurking this thread, it has been useful.
>Guess what they found at the end of the rabbit hole?
Something that was an actual crime? What's your point? Saying you find children sexually attractive isn't a crime in most "modern" countries. (Storing CP is though, strangely.)
>Pedophilia isn't a orientation. Homosexuality is an orientation.
If you dig into some of the tor2web links I gave, you should be able to find some mention of attempted curing of pedophilia, or a comparison to attempted curing of homosexuality, or something. TL;DR may not be possible and you may end up just fucking up the person you're trying to "cure" from pedophilia.
But we lack data from what I know.
>People aren't born pedophiles. Something damages them so they become pedophiles.
Why are you pulling shit out of your mouth? This is unproven and most likely wrong. Read the sexarchive.info link I gave.
>Sorry, bro. Islam doesn't do the hurting. The people do.
>No, no. It's apparently the people who are doing the hurting. Not any other factor.
No need for such stupid obnoxious sarcasm, have a proper debate if you want to.
I never encounter it in public so I don't mind it that much.
But whenever I go to the house of a relative who smokes I consistently get horrible headaches and occasionally have to lie down. It's happened all my life and I can't get used to it.
You can do it in public as much as you want as long as I don't have to deal with it, but don't tell me to grow up because I don't want to breathe that garbage.
Being exposed to gay propaganda also seems to do it
>Russia bans discussion of homosexuality around minors
>Experiences population growth for the first time in 20 years
Correlation does not imply causation. (And citation needed BTW.)
>The Government is run by people, so it has the ability to do it.
So? The Government isn't actually hurting anyone. It's the people. The Government has no physical form thus it can't hurt anyone.
The mental illness one was a bad example.
Shut it, pedo.
Give me some data, faggot.
How did this turn into a pedo thread?
Based Russia. I'd go to Sochi to see the Olympics and spend tourism bucks if I had any.
Shit-posting tripfag that people still reply to.
Entropy, the farther you are from the airdate of an anime the less on topic the threads will be.
Pedos and lolicons have absolutely no impulse control. Sad, really, I just picked this up and it already looks like I won't be able to discuss the show here.
How would it not? The OP implied that lolicons were something bad, and that lolicon=pedo shortly after, though >>101104809 was the first to mention pedos.
Eh, do you mean the Kevin-Kun tripfag? I'm not fond of him, seems pretty stupid, but he only seemed to join the thread later.
>Abused "More Likely to Be Gay"
CDC: 94 to 95 Percent of HIV Cases Among Young Men Linked to Gay Sex
Drug Use "Seven Times Higher" Among Homosexuals
Higher Risk of Mental Health Problems for Homosexuals
HIV Among Homosexual and Bisexual Men
Homosexual Men Have Fifty Times Higher Rate of AIDS
Homosexuality: The Mental Illness That Went Away
>How Different are the Adult Children of Parents who Have Same-Sex Relationships?
Inside the Meth-Fueled, Week-Long Orgies Plaguing London's Gay Scene
One in Five Homosexual, Bisexual Men in U.S. Cities Has HIV
The Removal of Homosexuality from the Psychiatric Manual
Report Finds Black Homosexual Males in U.S. Worst Hit By HIV-AIDS
Statistics on Sexual Promiscuity Among Homosexuals
STD Facts - Syphilis & MSM
Viral Hepatitis Populations - Men Who Have Sex with Men
Not really ironic, but yes, lolicon is bad and disgusting and worse than smoking.
>Saying you find children sexually attractive isn't a crime in most "modern" countries.
It's called flagging yourself. If you walk past the police station and state loudly that you enjoy thoughts of overthrowing the country, do you really think they're just going to ignore you?
>(Storing CP is though, strangely.)
How is that strange?
Pedophilia could be a mental disease that the only known cure right now is suppression. A psychological disease that can't be cured with conventional methods. No one was born a pedophile.
>No need for such stupid obnoxious sarcasm, have a proper debate if you want to.
Well the original statement was fucking retarded that I responded to.
>Pedos and lolicons have absolutely no impulse control.
>The Government has no physical form thus it can't hurt anyone
Are you seriously this retarded?
noun, often attributive \ˈgə-vər(n)-mənt, -və-mənt; ˈgə-bəm-ənt, -vəm-\
: the group of people who control and make decisions for a country, state, etc.
noun \is-ˈläm, iz-, -ˈlam, ˈis-ˌ, ˈiz-ˌ\
: the religion which teaches that there is only one God and that Muhammad is God's prophet : the religion of Muslims
Look at you, you couldn't even resist replying to it even though the proper action is to ignore completely. Way to fucking go.
I happen to care more about the rights of a child than I do yours. I'm willing to stick my neck out for a cause I believe in, but I certainly don't believe that pedophilia is harmless, and therefore, I'm not going to risk anything in order to prevent your ass from going to jail if you touch a child.
I can't do a thing about children starving and dying from illness, but I can use my vote to prevent any sort of measures that would be taken that would allow people such as yourself to legally rape children.
I guess I should rephrase what I said, It's not that I have no interest in changing the world, I'm just not dumb enough to think it's even remotely possible. Nor do I think I have any sort of obligation to try to do so. I think the world is heading in a good direction, even if I don't lift a finger. I'm content with my life, so what reason do I have to change anything? Stop acting like you are some sort of crusader for justice who is willing to take up any cause to help another. You are completely full of shit, at least I'm honest with myself and admit that, generally speaking, I don't care about other people. I doubt you've done a single thing in your life that wasn't motivated by your own interests. So cut the bullshit and stop trying to blame "people like me" when you've done nothing to prove (except spew hollow words) that you are any different from me.
>how pedophilia is harmful
Why don't you follow my chain of responses to what was first said.
Pedophilia may not hurt people, but pedophiles do.
The government may not hurt people, but those employed by the government do.
>It's called flagging yourself. If you walk past the police station and state loudly that you enjoy thoughts of overthrowing the country, do you really think they're just going to ignore you?
They can't arrest you for that.
>>(Storing CP is though, strangely.)
>How is that strange?
Because it doesn't hurt anyone.
Unless they can prove that you did or contributed to the harming of a child, you shouldn't be counted as a criminal. In most cases, downloading CP doesn't even make anyone earn any money. And even if you buy it, it's likely that they just sold you some old video that's been circulating since 20 years.
>Pedophilia could be a mental disease that the only known cure right now is suppression.
I hope you never become a therapist.
>A psychological disease that can't be cured with conventional methods.
You sound retarded, just stop.
>No one was born a pedophile.
You are retarded, just stop.
>Well the original statement was fucking retarded that I responded to.
Leave the board.
This is what denial looks like.
Smoking is okay when alone in your house.
Smoking is not okay when it involves other people.
Lolicon is okay when alone in your house.
Lolicon is not okay when it involves other people.
I'm too tired to read your wall of text. Seems pretty retarded and cringe-worthy from skimming. Just go educate yourself and stop being retarded. Bye.
Did you actually read all of that?
No you didn't.
so sekai seifuku is a modern day excel saga, right?
It's what being too tired for this shit looks like. I've been in this thread since the beginning and lost way too much time responding to everyone, at some point I get bored and just yell at people for how retarded they are.
>They can't arrest you for that.
Holy shit, man. I'm not going to help a pedophile not get caught. Keep believing what I said isn't true and we may get to meet sooner than later. Just leave /a/ though, I don't want to associate with people like you.
>Because it doesn't hurt anyone.
Except it does and the more people consume the more they want and the more children get abused. Not every pedophile is watching the same video for 20 years.
>I hope you never become a therapist.
I meant suppression in the sense of literally taking medication and stopping their desires. It's not really fair, but neither is fucking a child.
>You sound retarded, just stop.
No, I really don't. You got damaged and unfortunately there's no cure for it.
>All the rest.
You are so mad and in denial.
If the president of whatever country you live in declared tomorrow the day of "Kevin-kun is a faggot" and made it obligatory to punch you in the dick at least once that day, then the government would be hurting you physically.
The same can not be said to an abstract concept. Pedophilia can't rape a children, but a pedophile can.
>I guess I should rephrase what I said, It's not that I have no interest in changing the world, I'm just not dumb enough to think it's even remotely possible. Nor do I think I have any sort of obligation to try to do so. I think the world is heading in a good direction, even if I don't lift a finger. I'm content with my life, so what reason do I have to change anything? Stop acting like you are some sort of crusader for justice who is willing to take up any cause to help another. You are completely full of shit, at least I'm honest with myself and admit that, generally speaking, I don't care about other people. I doubt you've done a single thing in your life that wasn't motivated by your own interests. So cut the bullshit and stop trying to blame "people like me" when you've done nothing to prove (except spew hollow words) that you are any different from me.
That's really the only important part, and no, I didn't. I've got nothing to gain from reading anything that is longer than a 4chan response.
Something like that, but with more serious and questionable actions, and it will probably go somewhere.
Holy shit. Holy shit. Stop talking. God, my side are in orbit.
You're a shallow retarded piece of shit who thinks everyone on earth is as scum as him. Have a bad day, I'm off.
So you quoted a piece that actually refutes your own claims, and nothing you are saying has any backing in reality then? Why should anyone care what you have to say? Your opinions are childish and not well founded, the facts that you spew are either not in your favor or laughably false, and you are prodding at motivations of others that you cannot reasonably expect to understand even in the slightest. How emotionally shallow and idealistically unmovable can someone get? Why is it that people with the most impetus towards their ideology are the most likely to deny facts that do not fit them?
Because you're wrong. The Government isn't actually hurting me. The people are hurting me.
Just like pedophilia doesn't hurt people, but a pedophile following his pedophilic instincts hurts people.
Pedophiles hurt children by creating demand for CP, which results in more children being used and abused to create more CP. This is a fact.
Deep down, yes, I do think most people are selfish. Or I think they are too apathetic to be bothered to actually make a change. All of the people in my life that I've heard spew the same shit as you are nothing but talk, and they just give lip service to feel better about themselves so they don't have to accept the fact that they are selfish. The only people I've met who actually do care and are willing to help others don't go around talking about it, nor do they chastise others for being selfish.
It's already begun.
/a/ ped's & loli-cons are already self-congratulating themselves that they're just normals like gheys. Next phase of normalization will be the one borrowed from teh gheys... "coming out of the closet" and hope&pray the "haters" won't disembowel ped's/loli-cons.
Sidenote: In fact, in Japan... saying (or being that) you're a lolicon (JP definition also include 3D) doesn't get you disemboweled like in so-called "western civilized countries". Look at their media... there are dorama and anime portraying lolicons (JP definition) as a running joke or comedy relief.
Movie pirates are killing the industry by creating demand for movies, which results in more movies being made. This is a fact.
Then why is there new CP featuring new 'models' appearing every year?
Actually it does, you should probably learn more about Japan outside of anime, bro.
I can never tell if Islamophobia on 4chan is from Jews who have no right or from Britbongs who have every right.
>I am retarded and I know nothing about Japan
Yes, we know. Stop embarrassing yourself.
Britbongs and Jews are not the only Islamophobes in the world, anon
I am usually on the pro-loli side of these arguments, but there's a bit in here that I disagree with.
>Children are capable of understand both the act itself and the reasons behind it
This is like saying "children are capable of learning to drive cars, so we should let them drive cars whenever they want." or "children are capable of understanding the implications and long-term consequences of alcohol and drug use, so we shouldn't have legal drinking/smoking ages."
Fact is, ages of consent are an inherently good thing to have, because the older someone is, the more educated they are on average, and contraception just isn't reliable enough to alleviate all danger. Of course, there are some problems with this system. Many legal adults just simply aren't mentally mature enough to handle alcohol, drugs, driving, or sex. And many children or teenagers are very mature for their ages, probably moreso than some adults. Ideally, we would use some kind of "sexual act license" system where anybody who wants to be considered legally capable of giving informed consent should have a license that they've received by passing a test focusing on things like STDs, all of the inherent risks to sex, as well as other things like facts about homelessness rates, costs of living, and so on.
But we don't have that kind of system. The age-based system is the best way we have right now of protecting children from making stupid mistakes that will completely ruin their futures.
What? Do you not know how to read or something?
Government = Group of people = Physical concept
Pedophilia = Sexual deviancy = Abstract concept
I mean, if you can't even understand such an elementary concept, I don't know why am I wasting my time with you.
>a bunch of links saying homos are dangerous
>oh my god, what a load of bullshit
>a bunch of links saying pedos are dangerous
>I knew it!
Anon, he barely understands how to breathe.
>Except it does
Does this mean videos of robberies hurt banks?
Yet another thread where people confuse the terms pedophile and child rapist. Yet another thread where people who don't actually know anything about the topic they're debating spout their shitty opinions. I shouldn't even be surprised anymore, but I was really expecting the smoking debate this time.
>They take advantage of a child and toss them aside when they get bored of them
You mean just like 14 year old boys would do?
Tell me the last time you touched a Government, okay?
>Ignored the rest of the sentence.
Yes, they can expose the flaws in the security mechanisms.
Oh boy, it's one of these threads.
At least there were only 30 or so posts arguing about the definition of irony this time.
Fuck's sake, /a/.
>See clinical psychologist a couple years ago for completely unrelated issues
>On the first day I walk in she briefs me on the whole deal
>The usual, anything you say here is completely confidential yadda yadda yadda
>Anything pertaining to child abuse or exploitation she's legally obligated to report to the police
some time later
>Reading news story about a guy arrested for possession of CP
>Some hobo found a collection of photos that was dropped off at the local dump
>They were able to use security camera footage and DNA testing to link it back to the previous owner
>They found nothing else in his home
>He was trying to give it up and move on
>Still went to jail
some time later
>Read story about another man who was arrested for CP possession
>He had a diaper fetish
>Downloaded massive archives of legal 18+ diaper images
>mistakenly mixed in was one image of a child
>a year in prison
There is no help for pedophiles. Even if you make an attempt to get clean and get your life in order they'd still rather just send you to jail for the rest of your life. Even if it was completely just an accident you try to seek help, they still treat you like you're Hitler.
Society is an absolute fucking heartless monster sometimes, far worse than those they convict.
See, it was an old hag in that show that was smoking.
You forgot about the guy who was thrown in jail for having a VHS of himself masturbating when he was under aged.
That's the first I've heard of that.
What the fuck..
>He had a diaper fetish
>Downloaded massive archives of legal 18+ diaper images
How I wish that was this guy who got arrested. People like this are worthless to society. Now all pedos being scum to society is a little much.
>says /a/nime fans
i barely watch anime these days, but from outsider looking in it does sure look like japanese is tolerant lolicon (JP definition) and won't be the type of people who would call pogrom on lolicons. In fact, they're more likely presented as caricatures for comedic relief.
Did you know you can be in prison
>Tell me the last time you touched a Government, okay?
You're killing me, man.
I have never touched a professional football team, but I know they are a physical thing because I'm not a complete fucking mongrel.
It really isn't that hard to understand, fuck.
>not the type of people who would call a pogrom for lolicons.
You mean like the LDP, the prime minister, Ishihara, and every other person in Japan with any political power has?
Also, again, I'm usually pro-loli, but the way that screencap makes it sound like adult-child sexual relationships have nothing wrong with them, I can't help but disagree.
Unfortunately in the majority of cases, whether an adult realizes it or not, if they have sex with a child, they are taking advantage of that child's ignorance. And it is incredibly easy for children to be taken advantage of in that way.
Yes, of course, it's possible for children to be educated fully and make informed decisions about sex. It's technically possible for that to happen. But do you honestly think that's what happens even close to the majority of the time? You think that when it's so easy for someone to take advantage of a child and have them agree to sex without fully educating them of the consequences, that they're going to take the time to warn them about things like "hey, uh, just so you know, if you agree to this, you may get pregnant or contract a deadly disease, or just end up with serious medical complications because your body isn't fully developed yet."
The screencap makes it sound like children don't need protection and aren't ever abused, and that's just not true. They ARE more vulnerable to abuse than regular adults, and them having legal protection is a good thing overall. If you want to argue about the specifics of the legal protection, that's fine by me. But implying that there's absolutely nothing wrong with an adult having sex with a child is just delusional.
>i barely watch anime these days
>JP definition of lolicon
Do you seriously not know where it comes from?
Lolicon is short for Lolita Complex. Which is literally an attraction to young girls. If you were to walk down the street proclaiming you were a lolicon, you wouldn't be treated as a joke.
>Accuse a mentally ill person of a criminal
Your thoughts? Is it normal to fear a mentally ill person?
Janitor please, why haven't you deleted this thread yet?
>says /a/nime fans
i barely watch anime these days, but from an outsider looking in (there are times when outside perspective actually makes sense) it does sure look like japanese is tolerant lolicon (JP definition) and won't be the type of people who would call pogrom on lolicons. In fact, they're more likely presented as caricatures for comedic relief on media.
I honestly hope they just outright outlaw and start a 'war' on pedophilia so I can feel more dirty when doing it while smoking
>If you didn't want them to be traumatized, you wouldn't touch them in the first place
Hence why most child molesters are not pedophiles.
Of course it is.
>bunch of fat, unhealthy fucks
>sit around computers all day watching chinese cartoons
>take pride in never going out and being a respectful member of the society
>muh NEET and not normalfag life
>complaining and frustrated about smoking being detrimental to society
>implying they haven't
What country are you living in? Just look at Canada, UK, Australia. Pedophiles are literally worse than hitler. I am serious. Neo-nazis are treated better than suspected pedophiles.
Tell me about your experiences.
Sweet I've filled my quota for 'reading the stupidest thing all day' today.
inb4 muh vocal minority
It should be no leap of thought to be very weary of a person or indeed any thing that behaves outside of normal expectations - for any reason.
It' true though anon, most child molesters are not mainly attracted to children.
bro, LDP et al are just being pressured by outside forces that they could give two fucks about. Only Keidanren has real influence on LDP and only wants real stuff done... like you know... lowering tax rates, flexible labor rules, three arrow (loose monetary/stimulus/restructure)
Why, your thoughts are nice. I appreciate it. Okay...
Difference is that cars actually have a purpose.
Smokes don't and are just abused by weak, spineless addict cunts who need their fix every 5 seconds
All men are rapists and pedos, anon. Feminism says so.
>You need to learn how to enjoy oppai.
I love Oppai loli.
Stop it, anon! You're killing me! You should put together a stage act and go on tour!
>*angry moth noises*
Why? Moths are designed to make as little noise as possible so that they do not reflect echolocation from bats, that's what the hairs all over their body do.
You can walk around in my country talking about eugenics and genetic discrimination and people would say "wow rude" then go about their business. Or some might agree.
Meanwhile, you'd probably get lynched if you walked around with a shirt saying "I'm a pedo!"
are you stupid?
i know what lolcon is
/a/ think lolicon is only 2D
JPN usage of lolicon includes 3D and is preferred to use casually than mouthful kanji equivalent.
Just what the fuck? Most actual child molesters are doing it primarily for the sense of power, there's nothing that can be called "philia" in its original meaning. Actual child molesters are primarily sadists, nothing more, nothing less.
Brilliant! Oh God, comedy gold here, folks! I'm so glad to be here to see it!
Oh, you truly are an idiot, I see.
>Then why is there new CP featuring new 'models' appearing every year?
the burden of proof is on YOU now
otherwise you're just jive talkin
Lets go back to main theme
BURN. Sweet put down bro!
>mfw Smokers Internet Defence Force tries to push blame at MUH CHILDREN
You've never touched a crowd, but a crowd of people can touch you.
>Society is an absolute fucking heartless monster
>Depriving someone of his freedom even for a second is a massive crime
>If the State deprives someone of it's freedom is correct
>The State can also deprive someone of his life based on the judgement of a single person
>Homicide is obviously a crime
There should be more examples but yeah..... you get the point
>Liking people your own age is pretty nice.
Would that I could Kevin
Kills you, kills life around you, and smells bad.
Literally nothing harmful about this. It's not like they have loli pride gangbangs in the streets and spread life ending diseases.
ITT: Bunch of idiots who can't tell the difference between reality and fiction. Why the fuck is its so difficult? Too much bible perhaps?
>ITP: A single idiot who thinks the world is actually that black and white
smokers is bigger problem and more harmful to society because of the costs it incurs on private enterprise and government forced to spend more on welfare.
>muh feelings and sensibilities offended
>call for pogrom!
smoker problem... REAL PROBLEM!
> Total annual public and private health care expenditures caused by smoking: $96 billion
-Annual Federal and state government smoking-caused Medicaid payments: $30.9 billion [Federal share: $17.6 billion per year. States’ share: $13.3 billion]
-Federal government smoking-caused Medicare expenditures each year: $27.4 billion
-Other federal government tobacco-caused health care costs (e.g. through VA health care): $9.6 billion
>Annual health care expenditures solely from secondhand smoke exposure: $4.98 billion
Additional smoking-caused health costs caused by tobacco use include annual expenditures for health and developmental problems of infants and children caused by mothers smoking or being exposed to second-hand smoke during pregnancy or by kids being exposed to parents smoking after birth (at least $1.4 to $4.0 billion). Also not included above are costs from smokeless or spit tobacco use, adult secondhand smoke exposure, or pipe/cigar smoking.
> Productivity losses caused by smoking each year: $97 billion
[Only includes costs from productive work lives shortened by smoking-caused death. Not included: costs from smoking caused disability during work lives, smoking-caused sick days, or smoking-caused productivity declines when on the job.]
The world is that black and white. If you can't separate fictional contexts from reality, you are by definition, psychotic, and need to take plenty of antipsychotics to get better.
>Annual expenditures through Social Security Survivors Insurance for the more than 300,000 kids who have lost at least one parent from a smoking-caused death: $2.6 billion
Other non-healthcare costs from tobacco use include residential and commercial property losses from smoking-caused fires (about half a billion dollars per year) and tobacco-related cleaning & maintenance ($3 billion).
- Taxpayers yearly fed/state tax burden from smoking-caused gov't spending: $70.7 billion ($616 per household)
- Smoking-caused health costs and productivity losses per pack sold in USA (low estimate): $10.47 per pack
- Average retail price per pack in the USA (including sales tax): $5.29
Fiction presents us with ideas and situations that fall outside of our own society's context so we can explore and analyze them more easily and on a larger scale.
This episode brought up the idea of a world in which a sexualized little girl walking around almost naked is more socially acceptable than people smoking, which is just near unthinkable in most modern societies. The conversation escalated from there into the moral and scientific complications of pedophilia. That's worth talking about.
what's wrong with smoking?
I wish I was his mom
It kills you anon
old and disgusting
monetary negative externalities of smoking (marijuana included) is more a real problem and worth more talking about than LOLCON and the baggage of muh feelings it brings
Did you hear anything from the gif? So, your question answered.
your statement is more of hypocrisy, not irony.
I guess I should pick it up, we all know the less /a/nons in society, the healthier that society is.
Can we at least agree that children just are sexy?
>a magic man who wants you to kill gay people.
Jesus neva said shit about the gays. It's the Old Testament that speaks on gays being evil. Along with shellfish, pork, and cutting your hair being evil.
IM GONNA BE FUCKING FORCED TO PAY FOR YOUR FUCKING HEALTHCARE SOON AND PUSH OUR COUNTRY'S BUDGET FURTHER DEEP IN THE RED AND INCREASE THE RATE FOR EVERYBODY PAYING INSURANCE
I'm kind of surprised everyone is jumping on the smoker thing and not the fact that the good guys fucking nuked a city just to kill the little girl, and failed.
Or that Yasu survived the nuke to the face.
Or the fact that the smokers became literal zombies after the bomb hit and everyone just let them go about their buisness.
Oh shit, thanks Obama. You just gave me a good reason not to smoke. I don't want to be a burden on other anons
This goes without saying, surely.
Sexualized little girl walking around almost naked produces no harm in itself, if there aren't people idiotic enough to try to fit their oversized organs in her underdeveloped orifices or doing something else against her will. If they do that, they are either very very stupid by not being able to see the possible consequenses, or sadists. On the other hand, masturbating to the aesthicity of her form in private, for example, doesn't harm her, or anyone else in any way, and if there is any harm in it, it's caused by the socially held and forced belief that there's something inherently wrong on it.
On the other hand, smoking in itself causes toxic fumes and waste. Most of that could be avoided by for example e-cigarette, while retaining the positive aspects of it, if any. For some reason thats usually seen as "lame" by societal standards.
Why must there be idiots who ruin everything?
>Impying the 400% tax on smoking isn't going to be paying for your medical bills
I don't care if Lotte isn't sexy. I'd still love her tenderly.
>it's caused by the socially held and forced belief that there's something inherently wrong on it.
isn't escalation the natural process here
When did /a/ become a pedophile haven?
Since forever, kid.
I am disturbed by the lack of lolis in this thread.
You're the only pedophile, anon. Everyone else is being ironic.
Since moot killed /l/
I touched a police officer once. That was a part of the government
you mean anime children right?
Each person in that video most likely smoked
it's to be expected from #1 country in cigarette consumption per capita
Since three days ago. /a/ was pedo free before that.
>having a fetish for a certain kind of underwear makes you scum
>but being a pedo is a-okay!
You do realize how retarded it is to try to lump in all diaper fetishists with that guy, right? Especially since his truly dumb quotes have nothing to do with his fetish.
add to that the fact that they're soldiers, the chances are nearly 100%
Let's move onto something more fun /a/, who's the hottest smoker in anime?
>/a/ - anti-smoking loli inquisition
Could someone fill me in on why this episode was "ironic" or what the "joke" was?
>people actually trying to discuss whether lolicons are pedophiles or not
For a decent discussion both sides need to be somewhat impartial and in equal number, this place is basically Pedo S.A.
There's no point trying to have a discussion if one of the sides is in larger number and has their interest threatened.
>S.A. (and variants) designates a type of corporation in countries that mostly employ civil law. Depending on language, it means anonymous society, anonymous company, anonymous partnership, or share company, roughly equivalent to public limited company in common law jurisdictions
I thought the whole episode was just a joke about people overreacting over smokers.
Nothing "ironic", OP is just being a faggot.
The "joke" was the whole episode being over the top satire of the .
Dead, thank god.
I mean here is nothing like something awful, so I was curious what they were refering to.
Indeed, we're nice people, with even nicer tastes!
>I am disturbed by the lack of lolis in this thread.
They are cancer itself.
Nothing "ironic", OP is just being a faggot.
The "joke" was the whole episode being over the top satire and a demonstration of Zvezda's power and Yasu and Kate's personalities.
Well said, brother.
That's being hypocritical, not ironic.
Which I don't think it is if we're going by 2D, not 3D
Is this your first time discussing with other people?
Because you're doing it wrong.
The first is okay when the "other people" aren't against it.
Pedo is pretty much fucked by the fact that "other people" barely has a will of their own.
I am glad this show is getting the pixiv love it deserves.