[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/a/


File: samuraipizzacats.jpg (24 KB, 400x300)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
Would you guys be on board for a /vr/ version of /a/?

I would love a board to talk about older anime. Pic related, if your Saturday morning didn't
>>
>>101046000
Didn't start with this your childhood pretty much was a non-child hood.*

Hoe fuck I missed a great get up.
>>
No, just talk about it on /a/.
>>
File: 1389810248102.png (294.09 KB, 850x1018)
294.09 KB
294.09 KB PNG
>>101046000
>>101046054
Quality post OP.

Please kill yourself immediately.
>>
>>101046000
>I would love a board to talk about older anime.

The situation isn't so bad here that older anime can't be discussed. Often they form their own little niche threads with their own regulars and go relatively unnoticed by those not interested and thus stay on topic. Older anime simply doesn't get discussed because, after all, what is there to discuss but nostalgic circle-jerking and discussion done to death many times before?

There really is no point.
>>
>>101046000
Try >>>/m/
>>
Hey OP I get what you're saying, but there is no need to have a separate board.

Let's just have a thread about older anime instead.
>>
Yes.

/a/ is just /v/ but for anime.

/vr/ is an actual good board and I'm sure /ar/ would be too.
>>
i would prefer a manga board better, the autism in here is just to much and anime turned to shit recently
>>
>>101046273
>/a/ is just /v/ but for anime.
You don't know what you're talking about.
>>
Absolutely fucking not. Kill yourself.
>>
>>101046120
Why is she so mean?
>>
/vr/ isn't a nostalgia board. Go to /b/ or wherever for that.
>>
Oh it's the retard from /m/ again

Fuck off with this terrible fucking idea and your fucking shit meta thread.
>>
>>101046412
I guess the IGN and cell phone threads were just my imagination.
>>
>>101046412
Nope, both /a/ and /v/ are the same kind of cancer.
>>
>>101046536
/v/ spotted that time of the day where we have no janitors. /v/ is the cancer killing 4chan. We just report them and tell them to fuck off.
>>
>>101046412
with threads like these it might as well
>>
>>101046530
>>101046526
>>101046429
Is this a /b/ raid or something or are /b/tards spilling over again.

Gota get that ''lulz''
>>
But we talk about old shows like LoGH all the time, you just don't have to make threads about it all the time.
>>
>>101046597
And yet, the same kind of shit pops up every day.
You need to face the reality that its /a/'s users that want that content here.

I'm all for an /ar/ board. Just emailed moot and you should too.
>>
>>101046120
>do I fit in yet?
>>
But /co/ already has Toonami generals
>>
>>101046000
>would love a board to talk about older anime.
You can do that fine here. We had a World Masterpiece Theater thread today
>>
>>101046662

This /m/ retard thinks that if there was an /ar/ board they would suddenly be hundreds of posters magically popping into existence to discuss shows that nobody watches He's been campaigning for this useless board for a year now.
>>
>>101046639
>they disagreed with my dumbass idea, they must be from /b/!

next you are going to suggest fusing /a/ with /co/ aren't you?
>>
>>101046817
>gets mad for being called out on a shitposter.

>''Whale I don't like this idea, butter shitpost in this thread for the lulz instead of just ignoring it!''
>>
>>101046817
That would be a complete fucking absolute disaster.

Full scale war would break out in literally just 1 hour.
>>
>>101046639
Do you seriously think opposing shitty ideas means there's a raid going on?
>>101046716
No you fucking don't.

If you think you'll get to discuss your Cowadootyboy Beebbupp without elitism there, you're fucking delusional. If you think you'll be able to discuss things nobody talks about anymore due to there not being a big audience, you won't because there will STILL not be a big audience there either. It's a shitty idea and you're all fucktards.
>>
>>101046906
>shitposter calling other people shitposters

oh wow
>>
>>101046798
Oh, poor sap. Yeah that board would be deader than christ and it'd be full of "HEY GUYS WHEN I WAS LITTLE I WATCHED THIS ANIMES WITH THIS KID THAT TURNED INTO A MONKEY WHEN HE SAW THE MOON ANYONE REMEMBER THE NAME :)))) TY!!!!" threads.
>>
reported for metashit
>>
>>101046144
True. Old shows can be discussed. The situation is such that you actually can't discuss recent anime that do not conform to the generic piss taste /a/ has.
>>
>>101046995
>>101046906
>>101046817
>>101046776
>>101046716
>>101046412
>>101046144
Who are you quoting?
>>
>>101046906
>would you be down for a horrible idea?
>no fuck off
>OMG you're shitposting!

no one is on board with your idea
/thread
>>
>>101047168
>Me and 1 other shitposter=everybody.
If you like shitposting so much, why not go to /sp/?
>>
>>101047076
>recent anime that do not conform to the generic piss taste /a/ has.

which is no recent anime
It's safer to talk about past anime than recent anime nowadays
>>
>>101047241
Because /a/ is just /v/ with anime.
>>
>>101047241
Why don't you go to /v/ if you like making shitposting threads so much?
>>
>>101047241
If you like hugboxes so much why don't you go to /co/? An /ar/ board is a stupid idea and you are stupid for suggesting it.
>>
This thread is bad and you should feel bad for making it.

Why do you even think this was a good idea?
>>
/arm/ - retro anime & manga

Would be a god tier board.

Wouldn't have to hide posts from shitposters like the children in this thread.
>>
I want the old ass anime discussed on here. So I can shitpost and laugh at all the grandpas who read it.
>>
>>101047414
You know where you can go to discuss old anime? I bet MAL or Gaia would love to fap over toonami dubs for the millionth time.
>>
>>101047414
Remove the "retro anime" part and you have a deal.
>>
>>101047251
>which is no recent anime
Wrong. Hyouge Mono for instance, 3 years old but technically 1 year old due to the completion of the subs. Hoozuki no Reitetsu for a seasonal example.
What I meant was, you can discuss recent anime and there are certain series that are both good and appeal to large audiences, but the majority is shit that appeals to the general shit taste of /a/, and anything else won't get attention because people both have shit taste and are unwilling to try anything else.

>It's safer to talk about past anime than recent anime nowadays
I guess.
>>
>>101046997

We have a bunch of those here the past few hours, too. God christ where are any janitors or mods.
>>
>>101046000
If not an /ar/ at least an /ag/ we need a waifufag general to keep them out of /a/
>>
>>101047707
Get out fucking /v/ casual.
>>
>>101047707
Waifufags are the same now as they were 8 years ago when I got here. I dunno why you think we suddenly need a new board for them.
>>
>>101047414
Nah it would be a shit board

manga board would only be mostly weekly battle shounen and manga waifus. A bunch of autist complaining about cross content with /a/, trolls spamming Naruto every fucking day, and people making threads like this one wanting it to branch into "retro manga" like there's any real difference between generations, they'll probably be fuckers asking for a "seinen manga board" without any irony I want a manga board anyway
>>
>>101047766
What the fuck are you talking about?
>>
>>101047789
And a SoL general, a shonen general and a Madoka general, there's a lot of cancer that could be contained on that board
>>
>>101047707
attachment to anime characters is a common fact within all anime communities west or Jap'n

the only difference is we call ours "waifu"
>>
>>101047639
>I can't believe people on /a/ only talk about anime that they like!
>>
>>101047917
>people shouldn't criticize anything!

lel
>>
Every /v/ split resulted in just more and shittier boards than they were originally, and that's saying something. The only decent one was /vr/ but its slow as shit.

I can't fathom why people want more splits
>>
>>101047639
>you can't discuss recent anime and there are certain series that appeal to large audiences

fixed

the only true way to have a recent series well received is for it to be either few years old or under the radar like Hyouge Mono was during it's air time.

Don't even say "but if it''s an SoL then it's fine on /a/!" you know full well you and people like you constantly shit on those threads and anime. Can't call it well-received if it's being shat on.
>>
>>101048120
I literally didn't understand anything from what you said. Are you implying recent anime is not discussed?
>>
>>101048103
But off topic threads were rampant because of all the generals around.
>>
>>101048120
I've seen plenty of threads go to bump limit perfectly fine here for recent shows. Hell even KLK has decent threads every once in a while. Where did this idea you can't talk about recent shows come from?
>>
Moot created /vr/ because there was too much discussion. He won't create a board for something that doesn't get enough discussion. You just gotta actively make threads
>>
>>101048409
>I've seen plenty of threads go to bump limit perfectly fine here for recent shows.

most of those post are people saying something along the lines of "why do you people like this shit?" and people responding to him.

Let's face it, recent anime is only shat on, the only safe haven for them is if they randomly dump character images. That way no one talks, and thus no one shitposts.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.