Why is everybody so newly impressed by wow idol dark side?
There can't be that many people here who haven't watched this classic, right?
You'd be surprised.
They're more impressed that's it's being done by Yamakan who until this point has been shitting out moecrap for his entire career.
Yamakan is the new Satoshi Kon
I also remember when anime was good.
Except Yamakan is actually making something realistic faggot.
>why is OP being such an ignorant newfag moron once again?
Perfect Blue is mentioned in pretty much every WUG thread when discussion comes into "darker" Idol themes. That said, its not actually show about idols or showbiz, its focused on other circumstances and has different message.
Apart from her hallucinations (which realism is hard to judge because they're fucking hallucinations), the plot-line of an idol career was realistic in Perfect Blue.
So he'll be dead soon?
>the plot-line of an idol career was realistic in Perfect Blue
Rape scene and nude shots in WUB when?
>a picture and a segment of my own text
My point stands.
Because it's new.
Somebody on MAL actually recommended SAO as similar to Paprika
Fucking MALshit, man...Fucking MALshit...
>My point stands.
You brought this upon yourself and you know it.
It has... virtual reality?
Anytime. I mean, what's stopping them?
Apple juice and piss are both transparent yellow-ish.
Which one would you drink?
Something you don't have: virtue.
the only unrealistic part was the FeMC getting an acting career at the end instead of doing porn or marrying a celebrity.
>Apple juice and piss are both transparent yellow-ish.
>Which one would you drink?
Cider? It looks like one and taste like another.
Piss going by his willingness to defend MAL and SAO
So, is WuG any good?
Is it just cute Idols doing cute shit?
For many big name actresses, mandatory backroom sex comes with the acting career
ANN judged it 4.5/5 and 5/5 - best show of the season
And ANN hates idols, moe and cute shit.
>still thinking autism is an insult
ANN's reviewers are failed art/film students who think everything has to be subversive and shits, they are fucking retarded and have no taste.
I hate the modern feminist philosophy, but as someone whose lived in a dysfunctional family, my observation is that women always get the short end of the stick in society. It's not about rights, it's how society perceives them as less competent and weak.
The fact is they are emotionally much stronger than men and better at multi-tasking. This was part of my research project as well in social sciences.
Yes but idols aren't actresses per se; despite they stay in character for 24/7 since age 13 because otherwis the wotas won't buy their merchandise and multiple CD copies. Mainstream Japan despises idols
> emotionally stronger
Emotionally stronger as in they feel more or emotionally stronger as in they can manage their emotions better? Only one is correct and it isn't the second.
> better at multitasking
Tell that to every woman that flunks out of the fighter pilot program because they couldn't operate an F-16 at optimum efficiency.
>better at multi-tasking
No disagreement on the first part though.
Not that anon, but there have been various studies, and it has been proven that women cope better under emotional stress.
It has nothing to do with biological factors and everything to do with how we train them, really.
From children, we try to prevent women from being violent, while we encourage it to some extent in men(i.e. don't let that kid bully you, man up, etc).
So when angry, men have a bit of a leeway to act violent. When letting out your rage, it's the same as working out, which releases endorphins.
So the brain gets used to the pattern that when you get angry, you get to let out that anger through physical means, and then you get a natural drug somewhat similar to morphine. So being angry = happy brain. So your brain is not really going to make too much of an effort to keep its cool, as it got used to rage outbursts being rewarded.
In women, however, we tend to discourage violent outlets from a very early age, and throughout their socialisation process we try to wean them off of such things.
So, because the average woman won't experience such violent patterns, her brain won't be used to the same rewards system as when women are angry, we tend to let them 'shout it out', which will not release endorphins. So the brain has to slowly learn to cope with such stress without a physical outlet, so women will tend to turn to other means of reducing their stress, which will not be as rewarding as that of men, and thus less likely to happen.
TL;DR brains and we tell bitches to suck it up and then shout it out while men tend to fight it out.
>Studies show women cope better with stress, because they are not violent
There are also studies that show that women are more prone to PTSD when exposed to traumatic experiences than men. -Tolin, D. Psychological Bulletin, November 2006; vol 132: pp 959-992. News release, American Psychological Association.
Men and women deal with stress differently men drink or use other mind altering substances more frequently, but are more likely to remain functional than women, who internalize the trauma.
I think it's presumptuous to say that one of the two behaviors is better than the other. It is also just plain stupid to state that passive agressive bitching, gossiping, and manipulative ploys are necessarily less destructive that punching it out.
>emotionally much stronger
that doesn't mean anything.
>better at multitasking
we hear this shit all the time. Its most likely a completely bullshit mis-interpretation from a humanities journalist pretending he understands anything
>From children, we try to prevent women from being violent, while we encourage it to some extent in men
you have never seen the shit women do to each other when they fight have you?
>So when angry, men have a bit of a leeway to act violent. When letting out your rage, it's the same as working out, which releases endorphins.
>So the brain gets used to the pattern that when you get angry, you get to let out that anger through physical means, and then you get a natural drug somewhat similar to morphine. So being angry = happy brain. So your brain is not really going to make too much of an effort to keep its cool, as it got used to rage outbursts being rewarded.
thats the most bullshit generalization of behavior I have ever read
It's not really a good scientific explanation, there are more psychological factors involved which are left out, but it's a good dummy version of how endorphins work with the brain aka rewarding system. That's how addictions are formed, m8.
And that's also how we train pets. Go figure.
>> my observation is that women always get the short end of the stick in society.
The most privileged are (a few) men. And the most discriminated are men, too. In mathematical terms, P(men|privileged) = high, P(privileged|men) = low.
Low status men are cannon fodder, expendable resources. No one cares if they die or suffer. See homeless people, most of them men. Women are actually more valued than them. Of course not all the women are the same.
You are now aware the reason why there are so few homeless women is because of human trafficking who also target homeless women.
So they get roof over their heads and a supply of the D?
Sounds like a great trade.