[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/a/


File: 80 now and then anime.jpg (276.54 KB, 1280x1440)
276.54 KB
276.54 KB JPG
Why is proper shadowing such a rare occurrence?
>>
>proper shadowing
>that light source
>underground
No.
>>
otaking please go
>>
>>100194998
Why the fuck is everything freaking shining?
>>
>>100195171
The future was so bright back then
>>
Shadows in real life don't look like either, it's an artistic choice.
SHADING is hardly even an 80's thing, and SHADING was only in high budget movies and OVAs, occasional moneyshots don't count.
>>
How's the Star Wars fan animation coming along?
>>
>>100195171
>>100195219
Everywhere was a jazzy bar/club. Even in space.
>>
>>100194998
That kind of shading only existed in high-budget OVAs and movies.
Never in 50-episode series.
>>
You could get that shadowing. If you were a three episode OVA with the same budget as the series.
>>
just look at this superior 80's shading.
>>
>>100194998
I'd take better animation over shading any day.
>>
>>100194998
Because the source material never have good shading either
>>
>>100195263
>moneyshots
prostitute pls go
>>
I want you to tell me if you have EVER fucking seen a human being shine like that
>>
Just look at all of these tones and shadows, such good artwork, the 80s were superior.
>>
Especially the OVAs, good shading man.
>>
File: Akira.street.scene_.jpg (411.11 KB, 1920x1080)
411.11 KB
411.11 KB JPG
>>100195373
It's funny because Akira actually did have good lighting and shadows but they still look nothing like the multi-tone style that Otaking loves so much.
>>
bottom image looks like a bad BD encode hackjob
>>
>>100195615
Cherryboyz, anyone?
>>
Just look at this superior 80s style shading in a high budget feature length production.
>>
>"proper shading"
>inconsistent lighting, everything unnecessarily shiny, random specular reflections up the ass, random reflected lights from nonexistent sources
>>
It's expensive, doesn't fit with most art styles or character designs and would involve a huge hit to animation quality on a typical budget.
>>
>>100195722
>>100195263
>Not liking shiny as fuck things that give the sould Flavor
Fuck off from my /a/
>>
Why is he coated in honey? Why does he look like he's been laminated? Where is the light source even supposed to be?

Why would Death The Kid of all people want to be drawn in a style that promotes asymmetry?
>>
>>100195872
>>100195373
>THORA
>>
File: Autism 2.png (131.42 KB, 311x458)
131.42 KB
131.42 KB PNG
>>100195872
>>100195707
>>100195529
>>100195449
>>
>>100196245
What?
>>
>>100195426
Why not both?
>>
>>100194998
Because SSY
>>
File: 1388073608349.png (161.39 KB, 600x600)
161.39 KB
161.39 KB PNG
>>100196552
Rumia does not appreciate being used that way.

>>100196693
Because budgets are limited.
>>
File: 1349639113472.jpg (519.26 KB, 800x1112)
519.26 KB
519.26 KB JPG
>>100196781
>Rumia does not appreciate being used that way.
Fuck you. I decide what to do with my touhous you fucking faglord.
>>
File: 1389047495836.jpg (372.93 KB, 646x929)
372.93 KB
372.93 KB JPG
>>100195373
>>
File: 1387851164271.jpg (86.09 KB, 501x501)
86.09 KB
86.09 KB JPG
>>100196877
It's fine with dorks, but Rumia is not a dork.
>>
File: 546346.jpg (548.45 KB, 800x1200)
548.45 KB
548.45 KB JPG
>>100196952
No, fuck you. Fuck your rules. Fuck you.
>>
>>100195707
>responding to cherrypicking by cherrypicking
>>
File: 1388978107705.jpg (143.73 KB, 600x600)
143.73 KB
143.73 KB JPG
>>100197094
If you want to bully someone, bully Tenshi.
She's practically begging to be bullied.

Why do I have so many images of crying Touhous anyway?
>>
>>100194998
harder to animate.
>>
>2014
>Otaking thread
>>
>>100197278
Tenshi = masochist LEL
>>
File: 1388447598806.jpg (1.53 MB, 1500x1500)
1.53 MB
1.53 MB JPG
>>100197456
I'm more talking about her spoiled attitude making her a perfect target for bullying.

I love Tenshi.
>>
File: ZZ.png (868.22 KB, 960x720)
868.22 KB
868.22 KB PNG
Your pic isn't proper though
>>
File: dsfsgdgdsg.png (133.65 KB, 609x174)
133.65 KB
133.65 KB PNG
>>100196245
>>100196552
How wrecked can you get?
>>
File: 1386512258035.jpg (64.57 KB, 1024x459)
64.57 KB
64.57 KB JPG
>>
>>100197400
>Otaking
Ano.. who's otaking?
>>
File: DP87cal-aug.jpg (36.93 KB, 500x431)
36.93 KB
36.93 KB JPG
>>100198012
If your point is that the 80s had multiple styles, nobody disagrees. You're just a cunt about it.
>>
>>100198185
The person who made those initial macros about muh shading a few years back or so

He's some deviantart youtuber faggot who loves 80s anime
>>
>>100198393
Yeah I googled him, but why has he been mentioned? I really hope /a/ doesn't care about that kind of people nowadays
>>
>>100198439
Where do you think the OP image comes from?



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.