>muh use bool...no, just stop there
>>707722the rounded part
>>707725you mean the rounded bevel? that's coming back in 2.81 I think
>>707739just try to make this piece, it's basically a half circle
Fuck it i got nothing else to do. At work so no Internet so excuse the potato quality from phone but i assure you the model is not potato quality
>>707776I even put in the bevels from that second photo then i beveled the bevels cuz it looks cool blender is the best hard surface modeling software come at me bro
>>707777and i got quads COME AT ME BROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>707776Not bad for a phone poster who still uses Blender 2.79.
>>707785>who still uses Blender 2.79.Well, look at those bevels and tell me it could have been done in 2.80.
>>707785>Blender 2.79ie the superior version
>>707790you wanna whine some more? it says "You can't do this in blender" and I just did it in Blender. I dont have 2.8 on my work pc otherwise id do it there. I am the Blender Mastur.GIT OUTAA HERE BOI
>>707813How did you do this?
>>707813Still not suitable for manufacturing
>>707819basic modeling. subdividing and creasing
>>707825Going to try again, I think I found some of my mistakes..thanks
>>707821No wayyyyy really? Who would'a guessed that?Awwww shit son, I can't use that for manufacturing? Noooooooooooo. What am I gonna give to the machinist? Who fucking cares. You wouldn't be able to use it for manufacturing even if you made it in Max, Maya, C4D or fucking Milkshape 3d. Get the fuck out of here with that shit. Of course it's not suitable. That's common knowledge, and not even the point of the thread.
>>707825nice approach, but i wonder how you made that round part, did you pulled the vertices by hand to form an approximative circular shape? Because i want it to have a nice defined radius
>>707842>pulling the vertices by handthis triggers my ocd so badly
blender can't do this
>>707865Fuck off dude they are putting bevel back in 2.82 or 2.81
>>707869That means...in one or two years?!
>>7078752.81 is for this month2.82 for February if im correct
>>707865its overblendlets will never recover from this one
Why are people lying about bevel in 2.8?Is this a sad smear campaign attempt by autodesk?
>>707893you can bevel edges in blender, but you can't bevel this particalar piece like the guy in the vid
>>707891imagine linking this video unironically
>>707865you can not compare moi3d, fusion360 etc with maya, blender or 3dsmax. they are different things.you can approach the same design but you have to extrude and move points, edges or faces.
>>707893smells like the usual orchestrated discord faggotry
>>707909>>707917blendlet here, could you make a short webm/gif on how you made that piece with such glorious topology
>>707930he's using 2.81 with readded bevel tool
>>707944what the fuck you're talking about it's 2.80
>>707944Can you stop with that.There are enough valid reasons to criticize Blender.Making up nonsense only makes you look like a giant fucking asshole.
>>707792The outdated, ugly, crappy version that nobody took seriously.
>>707792>Controls that made no sense compared to everything else>Right click nonsense>Dumb cluttered UI for ants>Obsolete sculpting tools compared to what we're getting in 2.81>Obsolete rendererKeep using 2.79 like the lazy contrarian you are, but you'll have to switch one day or another.
>>707985How does whining make them valid, let alone reasonable?
>>707917tell me how you made this now!
>imagine actually using artsy 3d modeling tools where cad is supposed to be used
>>708005>but you'll have to switch one day or another.why
>>708006I don't understand what you are trying to say.
>>707821>>707831use blender for 3d printing, mechanical parts ar kinda hard to get right cause its no CAD program but shit that is just supposed to look good it works wonders when you are not stuck with a CAD program
>>708019Is that a frequent struggle in your life?
>>707930>>708007it is just a disc with an extrusion in the middlei have not saved the previous file but i did it again it is basic modeling any /3/senpai can do>smoothed the cube once with top an down creased to make a disc>added more resolution to detail in next step>extruded faces in the middle, moved, added, straighten some edges
>>708035Occasionally, if i have to communicate with retards.
>>707865CAD Chad vs Bendy Blendie Flawless Victory
>>707821You don't do real life manufacturing with blender, or with maya/3dmax/houdini/cinemaYou use specialized CAD software for manufacturing.Dear lord how stupid you are, please be a troll
>>708049Fuck you triggered cunt. This is /3/
>>708049That's strange because I've modeled all my 3D prints with Blender and it works just fine. Of course I'm not designing a jet engine here, but for simple CAD stuff it works 100% fine.
>>7080603d printing is not manufacturing.
>>708060holy shit blendlets are so retarded
>>708084Your non-CAD software isn't up to the task either Autodork, CHECK AND MATE
>>708101>CAD software is best suited for this situation>Blender is not CAD softwareyou are slowly learning
>>707865Those fucking onions-claws. Is anyone on this board not a pink skeleton freak?
>>708119Not all. Some of us are fit and lift (hope I'm not the only one). it helped me greatly to understand the human form and anatomy.
Moi3d + quad remesh addon
What's up with this "no bevel past Blender 2.29" bs?
>>708340Probably just a troll with a lot of perseverance
>>707909>>707917Bros I'm kinda feeling like I want this thing inside meAnyone else?? Haha
>>708321i challenged myself to approach the same design poly modeling.
the virgin perfect vertices VS THE CHAD SHITTY MODEL
>>708520i get some expansion on the edges when using this method
>>708505you probably want to bevel those sharp edges first
>>708573And what are you proposing? I'm not gonna install a completely different 3d package for a single tool.
>>708570the cube gives better topology
>>707720I can't do this with any software.
>>707865What software is that? I like how bevels calculated along with border. Cant do that in MoI3d :^(
>>708947I don't know what software that is, but Fusion 360 can do that. It's been a while since I used it, I think it's done with the Fillet tool.
>>7077852.79 is objectively better UI wise at least
>>708947Forget what it's called, but it's iPad only.
Spoiled kids. Bet you don't even remember before blender had smoothing groups and just hard edges.
ITT: Random faggot trolls blendlets into spending time to make a useless model. Get rekt
>>709457Jokes on you fag, my time is worthless
Did they seriously take away the Bevel tool from (((blender)))? Jesus christ. imagine unironically using blender. What's next, are they going to remove the extrude tool? Blendlets SEETHING
Never posted the edge flow for my model. Here ye go. Still at work so gotta take a photo with phone srry
>>709568lol pathetic meme.
>>709518>Shapr3DThanks.>>708960I know, but that looked kinda simplistic and wondered if it will fit my workflow>>709221Shame.
>>709568No they didn't, whoever came up with this bullshit idea is an complete retard and double nigger.And this is coming from an Maya user. Blenders bevel tool is up to snuff, and it is far superior to Modo's bevel tool which in the latest version was upgraded, but still is inferior to Maya and Blender. That's a tough cookie to swallow, but it is the truth.
done using booleans but not in blender. Took less than 5 min
>>709607Best ITT. Curious about your approach.
to lazy to actually follow reference but here is my try
>>710264i showed here >>708663. just polymodeling with subsurf using crease to hold the edges where needed.
i think today, ima go in blender and use the bevel tool again.