>>704819blender + octane standalone is the true patrician choice
octane is trash compared to many options master race Redshift
>>705056Agreed. I actually paid for Redshift, that's how good it is.
>>704819So THIS is the power of Octane.You may not like it, but this is what peak rendering looks like.
>>705076aside from a few kinks porting textures to octane it really is the best option imo. I literally switched from modo to blender because it's just that good
>>705056A lot of 3d fags tell the same, maybe it's cool telling that RS is wow and Octane not.I tried both, RS needs more work to get to the result, but it allows more control on layers.For what i can say, Octane seems a bit faster than RS, at least when you need simple renders.RS is better and faster for metals.Octane displacement kicks asses to RS.I didn't try the last versions tough.
>>705056>problem sits between chair and keyboard >still blames software
>>705146>>705153Main reason i got octane over redshift was that redshift does volumetrics waaaaay faster and i love volumetrics. A lot of my friends also have light linking or other small issues with octane and although it's technically more realistic i was coming from vray where i enjoy having loads of options
>>705154you mean clouds and fog?