Hey /3/ I've been thinking of learning some of this 3D shit, and I just downloaded Daz3d and cooked this up in a few minutes (barr crashing). I know this is literally tutorial level stuff, but how did I do? And where can I go from here if want to get decent at this, for making renders for visuals novels and such things?
for visual novels you gotta zoom in on her tits mate
>>704761>where can I go from here if want to get decent at thisLoomis.
>daz shit leaking all over the board.
>>704761Why are nearly all the links in the sticky dead
>>704761Good old Arcturus Cavern. So much porn has happened there.
>>704761nice, I was using this scene for my first renders in Daz continue
>>704761play with the camera setting, depth of field, perspective, use deformer, use dforce, use bloom in the render, use mesh light, use HDRI etc...
>>704761The platform has some smoothing artifacts?!
>>704992use Post denoiser in the render tab
there is a little problem here, it's because it's a very old prop for Delight with very low vectrex count or you don't convert the shader in Iray or the light is too powerfull
>>704992Yeah I noticed those, wasn't sure what to do about them. Is that what >>704994 is about? Or does it just remove "grain"?>>704991Thanks, I'll have a look at all of those, I do some casual photography so hopefully I'll catch on quick with the camera stuff. from what I can gather dforce is like maya's ncloth that I've heard about, is that right?
>>705002No it's what >>704999 said. The vertex count is too low and you might want to increase the smoothing angle.
>>704892Mod too busy pegging tranny janny
>>705005my bad lmao hadn't updated the thread
>>705002>maya's nclothI don't know( Post denoiser is for the grain only )
>>705010Would rendering in 4k or 1440 help with the quality even if it's being viewed in 1080p? And how would this affect the grain?
>>705015>Would rendering in 4k or 1440 help with the quality even if it's being viewed in 1080p? And how would this affect the grain?I don't think so ( I will try ), the render is going to be longer but 4K is nice.
>>704999Subdividing should get rid of that.
>>704761Well you're not really learning 3D, since Daz is a glorified scene editore, but at least it beats making compositions in Honey Select. To focus on creating visual novels imagery is really not important. Just got to have a decent plot and proper dialogues. Especially if you're doing porn VN, no one's gonna appreciate your work on the light there.
>>704762Definitely agree with him here. There's not enough tit zooming in. Kinda kills the whole presentation. 2/3's tits or it's artistic compromise %100. Stop over at an art school if you think otherwise, it's certainly common knowledge among people in this field. It's taught in most 3D Design 101 courses. lol
>>705246>There's not enough tit zooming in
>>705263She looks lifeless so they definitely captured the blacked aesthetic.
>>705263Is every DAZlet out there a cuck or what?
>>705263Bro, please, stay calm but... you need to do 16:9 renders if you want people to actually see them without black borders... I know, it's hard to grasp, but you'll get there...
>>704761>dazFuck off retard
>>705267it's a doll
>>705282I was doing 16:9 long ago but I don't like them
>>705296>it's a dollDeepening your autism, I see.
>>705263Well said, what is there to add? I can't think of anything, sometimes conversations really work out. I feel uplifted and optimistic. Humanity has some surprises up its sleeve sometimes. I'm rarely as proud of my species as now. lol It's hitting me. Incomparable luck I have personally.
>>705267why the fuck are we letting the 4:3-rendering 1-point lighting fag hijack 2 DAZ threads simultaneously
>>705425If we don't let him, he'll commit suicide. We don't want blood on our hands.
>>705425>2 DAZ threadsOh no you are correct it will take up valuable space for blender threads.
>>705425quit bitching you pathetic pussy. You are like a thread hoarder that cares about every trash thread. If it gets to the last slot on the last page its safe to say it deserves to die and if its there because of a bump limit then just make another thread for it and reference the old one.
FFS it's literally the poser demo scene from 2012 you absolute moron.How can so many "HIGH IQ" retards can be tricked by someone ripping the poser demo scene from half a dozen years ago. High IQ is â joke, by the way. You're all probably very, very low IQ.Do you want to talk about how it is difficult to live when you are objectively intellectually inferior to most of your pairs? I'm listening.
>>705493Who pissed in your wheaties?
>>705495Imagine someone ripping a Toy Story picture and creating a post about "Blender sucking", and then all the absolute retards agreeing that Toy Story is a retarded Blender render.That's you. Right now. You're all beyond the limits of:1. Ridicule2. Low IQ (clinically retarded) intellect.If you apologize right now, then I'd agree it was a retarded mistake. If you don't, that only means you are an unapologetic retard. That's bad, by the way. Unapologetic retard means something bad. Read the dictionary, please, I know it's full of difficult words for the like of you, but you really should.
>>705498...the fuck? I'm not OP and I don't know what your problem is you assclown.
>>705501... Low IQ. Sad!>>704761That is a poser demo render from 2012. All the retards took it as a Daz "first rendering" stuff. You are a low IQ retard, so you don't quite understand the issue, but a poser demo render from 2012 is not an actual, state of the art, late 2019 render. The number meaning the years don't match. When the number meaning the years don't match, that mean one of the years don't mach. 2019 - 2012: it doesn't match. You probably can't do the computation (I'm snickering because you're a moron, by the way), but that's what, 7 years of difference?Do you understand the point, absolute moron? You can tell me if you don't. I'm always listening to objectively inferior people.
>>705489You can stuff you very reasonable points up your ass, blendie.
>>705503Are you impersonating Terry A. Davis with that incoherent disjointed rambling to yourself? Do you wear tinfoil hats?
>>705493>the poser demo scene from 2012Only dazlets and similar kinds of degenerates know this. We see right through your charade, faggot.
>>705505I am right though. Google that. I expect an apology when you discover you were wrong all along. Please post it there. I'd accept your apologies.
>>705505I mean he is right. It is a default DAZ scene. He could be a little less of a sperg when making that point
>>705509Truth does not care about sperg! The problem here is that many "leftist" people makes a distinction between truth, and how truth is told. Truth is truth. Truth shouldn't need to conform to social norms. Truth is truth. Google it. And then apologize. I'm listening. I'm open to people who were wrong, even though they were wrong because they thought they were cleverer than who they were speaking to.Let it be a lesson.
>>705510This post is now in parody territory, with no way back.
>>705511I still expect my apology, sperg.
>>705493>>705498>>705503>>705510I have no idea what you're on about, I literally opened Daz grabbed some assets, looked up how to apply poses and slapped 3 spotlights on there (cause I figured multiple lights would look better(?)) and did some basic alterations to their parameters and rendered in iray.Though now I'm interested in seeing this demo you're sperging over. If it's that similar I could even compare my results I guess
>>705631Don't worry about it, this elitist sperg will eat his own words one day. You clearly said all you did was grab assets and throw something together in a few minutes. This full blow retard probably assumed that you are trying to pass off other peoples work/ assets as your own and showing off about it by saying "cooked it up in a few minutes" like you're some kind of wizard.