[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/3/ - 3DCG


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: artstation.jpg (15 KB, 349x355)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
Did you know this place is shadowbanning people now. If you post semi lewd stuff and you are wondering why ur likes and views have nosedived that's the reason.
>>
Well, duh.
That's what people get for trying to think they can upload their lewd works to absolute normie places.
For visible nipple stuff just fucking use Deviantart and call it a day. It's still lively enough.
>>
>>699502

Not even talking about nip slip or anything like that. Basic stuff like a visible ass in thong like 2B.
>>
>>699500
Do you have links to specific cases? Wanna exercise my right to schadenfreude.
>>
>>699503
I guess they're throwing this sort of stuff out because the site became somewhat of a business card for people and on top getting browsed at work since artists love to stea- .. use references. Throwing out everything that might raise brows probably helps for times when your boss looks over your shoulder in the open office space (as it is common now).
>>
It's just typical leftist fragility and catering to the professionally offended.
>>
>>699504

I'm the op. I am part of a discord where they are talking about this shit. None of the people there want to come forward but everyone has proven it's happening by searching for the artwork name and then it doesn't appear. We then search by artist and they are not there. Just thought I would give people a heads up. You can still access your portfolio to give to employers and that but you wont be winning any popularity contests anytime soon. My advice is just keep nudity out of your portfolio. if you host it there
>>
File: bs.jpg (586 KB, 1900x942)
586 KB
586 KB JPG
>>699500
>>699508
I'm going to call BS on that. No attempt to censor lewdness from search engine, nor on site.
>>
File: bs2.jpg (374 KB, 1900x942)
374 KB
374 KB JPG
>>
File: bs3.jpg (696 KB, 1900x905)
696 KB
696 KB JPG
Even Loli isn't off limit.
>>
File: artstation 2.jpg (295 KB, 2540x1195)
295 KB
295 KB JPG
>>699509

Then why do I have a completely different set of images to you.
>>
File: artstation 3.jpg (506 KB, 2542x1122)
506 KB
506 KB JPG
>>699512

Sorry didn't see you sorted by relevance. Still some different images.
>>
>>699513
Same images I just ctrl-scrolled to fit more onscreen.
>>
>>699508
I get what looks like the same as >>699509, I even get a bunch of crappy DAZ nudes. To be fair I have the maturity filter disabled.
>>
>>699514

Ur right. I'm on my fourth can of the night so not seeing straight.
>>
> https://www.artstation.com/artwork/QWOxd

wew lad
>>
>>699536
hahaha damn, I was wondering why a cat showed up in "sexy"
>>
File: eldar-zakirov-test06.jpg (272 KB, 1080x1080)
272 KB
272 KB JPG
>>699536
my fucking sides
>>
Why would they censor content which brings in so much traffic to their website? Especially now that tumblr committed the equivalent of virtual hara-kiri, no sane website staff is going to follow in those same footsteps.
>>
>>699572
Do not subestimate websites, sometime people in charge are retards
>>
>>699573
>sometime
>>
>>699574
Sorry i have braindamage and +24hrs no sleep
>>
Good.

We already have a deviantart we don't need another.
>>
>>699576
So I guess you're in charge huh
>>
File: 1517871699743.png (8 KB, 250x202)
8 KB
8 KB PNG
>>699500
Bro have you even read the rules on artstation? How fucknig dumb do you have to be to make this thread? Cringed
>>
>>699581

What rule are you referring to.
>>
>>699583
https://help.artstation.com/en/articles/55-mature-content-unsuitable-content
>>
>>699584

I'm not talking about pornography though. I'm talking about titillation like this. So obviously this is a new rule. Anyway my point still stands don't put stuff like this on artstation if you don't want to be shadowbanned. Don't know how the Chinese and Jap artists are getting away with it.
>>
>>699588
>So obviously this is a new rule.
The shadowbanning, if real, may be new; but the rule isn't. It was there at least one year ago.
>>
File: 1554061200670.jpg (274 KB, 600x750)
274 KB
274 KB JPG
just the west being cancer, as usual
>>
>>699500
>be worthless, insecure narcissist
>need attention
>can't draw/can't compete
>draw big titties because that's the only thing that people will give their attention to
>fill your folio with titty shots
>post to professional art website so you can LARP about being a pro too
>get (shadow)banned
I honestly do not see the problem.
I love seeing furry/weeb/pedo cumbrains getting what they deserve.
I love it even more when they orbit around artists and push them to make lewd for them but keep getting blue balled because those artists are actually good and need not stoop so low to get noticed.
I see this as a huge advancement to combat modern degeneracy and an example to be followed by many other websites.
>>
>>699500
Is there an alternative to artstation that doesnt require you to have social media accounts, where you can simply register with an email?
>>
>>699661

That's a lot of solipsism there polack. Type torchbearer into artstation and tell us how many sculpts show up.
>>
>>699675
Can't it jyst let you sihn up with an email? The options showing for me.
>>
>>699592
this
>>
>>699572
Artstation is about marketing artists to corporations.
>>
>>699505
Why are bosses looking over shoulders more often now?
>>
>>699742
I blame my breasts.
>>
>>699572
tumblr was a FOSTA/SESTA thing
>>
>>699751
I doubt they're interested in your moobs
>>
File: office-space.jpg (70 KB, 640x427)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
>>699742
office cubicles are rare now and got replaced by open office spaces
>>
No one seems to have definitively proved or disproved the shadow banning

Censorship in any form is bad
>>
>>699772
cumbrain speech isn't protected speech.
>>
>>699785
>imagine being this butt-hurt about people wanking it over porn
>>
>>699789
>n-no, y-you're mad!

>ARTSTATION BE SHADOWBANNIN DE LOLI PORN YO HIDE YOUR WAIFUS
>t. OP
>>
>>699785
Your projection is telling.
>>
>>699796

See

>>699503

Stop projecting and fuck off. You don't get to decide what is and isn't art. Move to north korea if you want your freedoms taken away that badly.
>>
>>699707
Yes but you still have to verify with facebook/linkedin
>>
>>699804
>Cumbrain-Central pedo screencap is supposed to prove something
Are you trying to prove me right, cumbrain? Because you are definitely succeeding.
>>
>>699808
Are you paid by the buzzword? You seem obsessed with cum.
>>
>>699800
Freedoms? It's not your website.
>>
Just use Pixiv for 3D lewds of all kinds.
It's also good because it auto-promotes your shit through feed and recommendations, so you don't need to do anything in order to get follows, unlike with DA and AS.
>>
>>699828

Did I mention website. I said the freedom to create whatever you want unlike that person who wants to dictate.
>>
>>699874
I didin't realize getting shadow banned on their dumb website deleted the work from your computer.
>>
>>699779
>Puritanism is as bad as degeneracy
You're right but do you know what is also as much bad? Instagram. I don't want artstation to become instagram.
>>
>>699878
I bet the extremist anon wouldn't be happy with people making and sharing porn in private, either.
>>
>>699770
its a form of social control
you are never alone anymore
>>
>>699893
Thank you, Jesus. But if I am to have company at all times, I prefer Satan. At least he doesn't kill people.
>>
File: 1407832299516.jpg (24 KB, 243x270)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
>>699888
I thought you were about to explain how a website imposing their own rules somehow affects your freedoms.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOH, right, I completely forgot.
You are assmad because sharing MS paint porn in private doesn't net you any upboats from dumb horny teenagers (and none of their autismbux), unlike polluting a well-known, art-centered social media, so you can't stroke your ego as much anymore.
Good job proving my point, C U M B R A I N
>>
>>699924
>I thought you were about to explain how a website
>a website
I didn't say anything about any website. Go back to school and work harder on your reading comprehension, son.
>>
>>699926
>grasping at straws
Gee anon, please tell us again how anything or anyone is preventing you from being a useless cumbrain in any way.
>>
File: 1536663163668.jpg (28 KB, 500x293)
28 KB
28 KB JPG
>>699924
>>699808
you're such a nasty cumslut
>>
>>699928
>please tell us again how anything or anyone is preventing you from being a useless cumbrain in any way.
Okay big brain, point exactly to where I said that anybody is being prevented from creating or sharing porn. These are my posts in this godforsaken thread:
>>699504
>>699532
>>699589
>>699789
>>699888
>>699926

Good luck.
>>
>>699934
Did you just "conveniently" leave out the post that laments freedoms being taken away >>699800 which started the reply chain about this pathetic excuse, or is it truly not your post, in which case why or who or what the fuck are you even arguing about/for?
Not that it matters, but still.
>>
>>699936
Can't you really tell the different writing styles apart? No wonder you buy into this "ban porn and kill all those who sin!!!1" bullshit, brainlet. As the other anon said, fuck off to North Korea, where you'll find a leader you can follow blindly, you filthy sheep.
>>
>>699937
So, you first hijacked a post chain that wasn't replying to you at all and then dropped it immediately after being btfo, pretending you were never part of it in a desperate attempt at damage control.
Gotcha.
300 IQ move.
>>
>>699500
Seriously there are countless websites where these porn artists can post their shit, i am tired of all the spam they do to "fish" some fucking horny teenager's money on their patreon
>>
>>699941
>hijacked a post chain
Welcome to 4chan, buddy. I understand the whole idea of anonymity, like that of personal freedom, may be difficult for you to entertain at first; but trust me, with time it'll become easier and you'll finally get it. Sadly, you'll feel like a complete retard on retrospect; but, as they rightly say, there's no gain without pain.
>>
Good.
Cumbrains ruin everything.
>>
>>699948
>lists all of his posts
>muh anonymity

Holy shit, mine was hyperbole but you cumbrains literally DO have room-temperature IQ.
No wait, don't tell me. >>699934 wasn't you, I take it.

Nobody is violating your personal freedoms, cumbrain. You're just seething because your ego can't take being locked out of a popular website.
>>
Didn't realise the amount of trannies that browse /3. No wonder the post quality here is horrendous.
>>
>>699951
>Nobody is violating your personal freedoms, cumbrain.
I never said otherwise.

>your ego can't take being locked out of a popular website.
I don't make crappy smut; not even titillating shit. All of my posts are abstract imagery.

>>lists all of his posts
>>muh anonymity
You don't get it.

All of this for simply pointing out that (You) might be too happy with censorship (>>699888). Seriously, are you pretending, or is it the real deal?
>>
>>699956
>repeatedly state nobody's rights nor freedoms are being violated
>"yeah I never said otherwise, but I'm concerned about you being so happy with someone's rights and freedoms being violated"
Seriously, we're approaching negative-IQ-tier logic here.

It's only "censorship" in the sense that cumbrains don't get to pollute a professional art website anymore.
Or, more generally, certain undesirables have been discreetly but firmly shown the door after they ignored the official sign that declared them unwelcome.

There is no real censorship being enforced.
Please tell me again how you never said otherwise to try to save your face, AGAIN.
>>
No self respecting artist would post on Fartstation to begin with, its a corporate sellout site.
>>
>>699960
Okay, let's get straight with logic. There is just one question that you have to answer:

Are you fine with people making and sharing porn in private?

That's all I suggested you might dislike. Was I right, or not? It takes a simple yes/no answer.
>>
>>699960
>pollute a professional art website
What does that even mean? It's not only "pros" that post on artstation and pros aren't exempt from doing crappy or derivative art either. Artstation's a dumping ground for art just like any other website of this type, they just do an okay job of hiding it because of the trending tab. No need to pretend it's anything more grandiose than that.
>>
>>699963
Yeah, Real Artists™ post on Twatter, alternating one smut post and one about SJW politics and how capitalism forces them to work at Starcucks instead of letting them create their Art™, with their pronouns and fetishes and ko-fi page proudly listed in their header.
t. cumbrain

>>699965
Bah, I guess.
My gripe has always been the dopamine-withdrawal-driven nature of publicly sharing smut. Everything worth seeing gets drowned in a sea of badly drawn genitalia that dumb horny zoomers keep upboating. Remove that, remove the problem.
And anyway, it would be a lost cause trying to fight private sharing.

>>699967
Artstation is the LinkedIn of the art industry.
Pros write their artstation page on their resume alongside their LinkedIn.
Not their Twitter, not their Facebook, not their Instagram.
It's what CG Society has been for the 3DCG industry for the past two decades.
It's what ZBrush Central is for the ZBrush community.
It just welcomes all kinds of 2D and 3D art.
Yes, you can find mediocrity that slipped through the cracks on those aswell, but it's not really their place. And they're not the place for mediocre cumbrains to farm upboats.
>>
>>699970
Linkedin is the linkedin of the art industry. Again, people just happen to dump their shit on Artstation because it's convenient, you can bring together screenshots, a video link and a model webviewer all together in one "post". You make it sound like anything below an arbitrary bar of quality shouldn't be on Artstation but that goes against the very nature of the website, of being a dumping ground that accepts anybody of any skill level.

Low-key though I'm pretty sure you're just fishing for (you)'s so here you go, glad I could help you sleep that little bit better tonight.
>>
>>699970

Nobody is interested in your Nazi iron cross medal models ok.
>>
>>699972
>you can bring together screenshots, a video link and a model webviewer all together in one "post"
Or, put it more simply, it's an easy-to-use and sleek-interfaced digital Portfolio builder for any type of digital and/or traditional art. Something that shitty mainstream social aren't, and even LinkedIn isn't, but complements the latter nicely for someone who does art professionally.

>You make it sound like anything below an arbitrary bar of quality shouldn't be on Artstation but that goes against the very nature of the website, of being a dumping ground that accepts anybody of any skill level.
There's DA for that.
It shouldn't, just like LinkedIn doesn't have as many worthless posts and people as Facebook does.
That's why I said it's the LinkedIn of the art industry, though I admit it wasn't very well put.
>>
>>699974
Great. As a last aside, I don't know why you're defending this idea that Artstation should have some kind of artistic and professional purity, but I'll just say this shilling is pointless, Artstation staff want everyone to post art because A: more traffic for any website is good and B: the more amateurish art provides a great contrast and helps to maintain a healthy sense of perspective on quality for your average viewer.

Saying that only pros and pro art should be on Artstation and everything else should be on sites like DA, maybe you don't even grasp this concept but such a viewpoint is downright harmful for Artstation's viewership and bottom line. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
>>
>>699977
There will be no shortage of shitty art on other websites.
I don't get what's so wrong about Artstation becoming the site people associate with only good art and not yet another smut-dominated attention-whore playground.
>>
File: 1567209513208.jpg (158 KB, 473x627)
158 KB
158 KB JPG
>lewd
I'm more concerned about the quality of the picture rather than subject. Titties are the second or last thing to worry about imo, art station has a lot of potential to be an easy access place of hiring professional artists and help the "starving artist" issue today.
My idea sounds maybe too harsh, but I think that it would be best for a serious art gallery site like artstation should prioritize on putting low quality art at the bottom page, or even out right banned if the user keeps posting the same quality garbage for a certain period of time. It can encourage users to learn how to fucking draw too
I don't know
>>
>>699977
>>699978
And there won't be a shortage of traffic neither. The same dopamine-junkie zoomers flock to see the latest movie/game assets posted on Artstation. They sell a Pro subscription which gives you more and better options for your portfolio, and take a cut out of their Marketplace sales. They don't exactly rely on traffic to survive. And even then, have you seen the ads they put up? 99% art-related courses.
>>
>>699978
>I don't get what's so wrong about Artstation becoming the site people associate with only good art

Websites are defined by their featureset first and foremost. This mentality that content should define what a website is associated with is exactly the sort of logic that causes 4chan to be wholly associated with alt-right and nazism even though that's strictly a /pol/ thing, and even then, that's just what mainstream outlets chose to take out of that.

Artstation is a place to gather links so other people can see them. That's it. Again, there's no need to glamorize it as anything more than that. It was smart of them to capitalize on their traffic by adding subscriptions, but that purely extends the featureset of the website and isn't strictly a thing reserved for a subset of the website's users like """pros""".
>>
>>699982
>Artstation is a place to gather links
4chan is a place to gather links.
Every website gathers links, you dunce.
By that logic, Facebook should be used over LinkedIn.

It's not, because Facebook is made for NPCs to squabble over petty things.
LinkedIn is made to grow a professional network.

Artstation is an art gallery made for professional artists to showcase their talent and sell their talent and their work. To both employers and common citizens.
It's not made for furries to sell Krystal porn.
It's not made for cumbrains to sell Bowsette porn.

And if you invited a potential client to examine your art gallery, you wouldn't want your own work beside some badly drawn smut, nor the front door to be plastered with it just because it was the flavor-of-the-month among zoomers.

And if they didn't take precautions against that, their site would suddenly become just a slower alternative to more fast-moving sites like Twatter/Instagram/etc. yet still flooded with smut, since smut dealers are narcissists and are always chasing after any way to get a fistful of upboats, however little it may be, which means they would both lose their reputation as a professional art site and their professional (and paying) clientele. And poof, suddenly the site is dead in the water.

There's already a slow-moving site welcoming shitty smut artists to frolic in, and that's DA. And indeed, nobody takes DA seriously.
>>
File: phl.jpg (101 KB, 1256x708)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
This thread smells of loneliness and cheap cologne.
>>
File: cum_addict.png (2 KB, 230x103)
2 KB
2 KB PNG
>>699950
>samefagging
now that's just embarrassing
>>
This thread is fucking terrible, even by /3/'s standards.
>>
>>700001
Yikes.
Couldn't be more wrong there you cumbrain.
>>
>>700001
its such a common term now that it's word filtered on some boards
>>
File: damnNoob.jpg (50 KB, 1330x422)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>699500
>>
>>700065
/thread
>>
>>700009
Really? I've never heard of it. Is it a new /pol/ memeword?
>>
>>700065

That just turns off the blurry background when you are browsing nude content. Are you stupid or something. What has that to do with shadowbanning.
>>
>>700076
Pretty much, yeah. Used by porn-ban proponents and Islamists.
>>
>>700081
Damn it. The left and the right are now advocating for porn ban? This is scary tbqh. Maybe it's for the better? idk
>>
>>700082
Prob hardcore christian no-fappers who're so backed up that their brains actually swimming in cum are the ones who came up with this moronic term.
They're cheered on by disgruntled low-tier females whom figured out how most modern males rather just watch porn than having to put up with any of their shit.

The whole idea is that these 'cumbrains' are supposedly slaves to their 'carnal shackles' and becomes uncreative because they can only think about sex.
But if you masturbate regularly you'll know how the very opposite is true. Soon as you fapped you'll stop thinking about sex and have your mind free to focus on other things.
>>
>>700098
I know the motives are completely different. The left wants to ban porn for its impact in poor people and the abusive shit that goes on. The right wing, as always, with some pseudo-scientific bullshit. I'm just glad I still have my porn right now and I wouldn't really mind regulation if it happened. I can totally understand the side of Artstation but I feel a little bad for the artists that make their living off of adult pieces.
>>
>inb4 bullshit PDFs they didn't even read in its entirety
>>
>>700098
>Soon as you fapped you'll stop thinking about sex and have your mind free to focus on other things.
True. It's also a fact that libido decreases with age. Personally I barely have the urge to release more than twice or thrice a week, and I'm just at my early thirties. Which makes me think that the no-fap/no-porn guys must be quite young and thirsty themselves, if their will is so easily overtaken by even the most basic porn. Sometimes, the most vocal preachers are the worst sinners of us all.
>>
>>700076
>>700081
>>700082
its just a /fit/ meme you over reactionary nutjobs
>>
>>700110
DAMAGE CONTROL
>>
>>700106

I'm 40 and I'm pretty much over with masturbation. Maybe once a month. Things they don't tell you I guess.
>>
>>700077
Nobody managed to prove it yet.
>>
>>700139

Why would they lie.
>>
File: 3a9.png (1.49 MB, 680x499)
1.49 MB
1.49 MB PNG
>>700098
>>700100
>cumbrains still sloshing around trying to decide which side of the political spectrum they ought to accuse of attacking them
>still utterly missing the point
You pulled out the politics motive straight out of your assholes yourselves.
None of this ever had anything to do with politics until you cumbrains desperately needed a convenient scapegoat.
You autistically repeated it so loud and so many times that there literally isn't a post right now that isn't trying to pin the blame on either lefty or right-wing politics.

The problem with cumbrains is that you consume literally anything that remotely hints at anything sexual in nature.
One could literally draw stickmen and stickwomen with stick-genitalia and you would manage to beat your dick to that. And the problem with that is that literally anyone can draw stickmen.
Now, imagine the extent of the abyss between drawing stick-people and actually being able to recreate the human form accurately. 100% of smut lies at the bottom.
Producing (and consuming) lewd art is literally supposed to be the ultimate appreciation of the human form and yet it manages to be the biggest failure at doing so at the same time.
Because the cumbrain doesn't work like that, it's just about muh lewd of whatever thing is popular at the time, because it's hip with edgy teenagers.
And god forbid you dare point out that they have shit taste, you get swarmed with forks by said incel crowd spouting incoherent excuses. Look no further than this thread for a textbook example.
Hence why smut became the lowest-hanging fruit for any failed artist to get le eric upboats to satisfy their fragile egos, why it's all DA-tier, why it's flooding every place that has to do with visual art and why it's still allowed to exist. Shit artists get enabled because cumbrains don't get enough blood flow to be able to tell an arm from a leg.
Closing the floodgates can only be a good thing.

There is no political motive in any of this.
>>
>>700155
Okay.

By the way, tits or ass? I'm a feet and armpit man myself.
>>
File: 1552566100222.jpg (31 KB, 386x794)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
>>700158
same but unironically
>>
>>700155
I'm still waiting for source on this tbqhwymdf
You pulled all that text straight out of your asshole yourself.
You repeated c u m b r a i n so many times that there literally isn't any meaning left. It's not a scientific term, it's not a meme, what the fuck is it? Where did you learn it from? Why do you so blindly repeat it?

>The problem with cumbrains is that you consume literally anything that remotely hints at anything sexual in nature.
citation needed. I don't. Do you?

>One could literally draw stickmen and stickwomen with stick-genitalia and you would manage to beat your dick to that. And the problem with that is that literally anyone can draw stickmen.
same as above

>Now, imagine the extent of the abyss between drawing stick-people and actually being able to recreate the human form accurately. 100% of smut lies at the bottom.
"porn videos don't recreate the human form accurately"

>Producing (and consuming) lewd art is literally supposed to be the ultimate appreciation of the human form and yet it manages to be the biggest failure at doing so at the same time.
Is it really supposed to be the ultimate appreciation of the human form? Who told you that? I've never heard of it. Seems like someone with sexual repression wrote it.

>Because the cumbrain doesn't work like that, it's just about muh lewd of whatever thing is popular at the time, because it's hip with edgy teenagers.
No meaning whatsoever. Are you saying the "cumbrain" doesn't see it as the ultimate appreciation of the human form? Well... of course they don't. Nobody does.

>And god forbid you dare point out that they have shit taste, you get swarmed with forks by said incel crowd spouting incoherent excuses. Look no further than this thread for a textbook example.
Nobody even posted lewd shit in here, how does it apply to this thread? Are you trying to imply the whole idea of making/consuming porn is shit taste? I hate to break it to you but this isn't "taste". 1/
>>
>>700155
>Hence why smut became the lowest-hanging fruit for any failed artist to get le eric upboats to satisfy their fragile egos, why it's all DA-tier, why it's flooding every place that has to do with visual art and why it's still allowed to exist. Shit artists get enabled because cumbrains don't get enough blood flow to be able to tell an arm from a leg.
"There are shit artists in the world." Yeah. I know. Not restricted to porn thogh, is it?

>Closing the floodgates can only be a good thing.
Believe or not... I agree. The porn industry as we know it need to seize existing. Or change dramatically.

>There is no political motive in any of this.
good to know. Now if you could please back up anything you postulated, that'd be great. Until then, keep dwelling.
>>
>>699500
Did you know that I don't do art for likes or views?
>>
>>699507
>implying that nazis don't like anime booty.
>>
>>700184
>literally talking about ART
>hurr porn videos
BIG BRAIN.

>Is it really supposed to be the ultimate appreciation of the human form?
>subject matter is literally naked people
>nobody bothers to even take the time to actually study the human form before attempting to recreate it
>cumbrains eat it up anyway

>Not restricted to porn thogh, is it?
Yeah, but whenever it's porn, suddenly shit artists are God's given gift to the world.

Do you see the problem now? Because I literally cannot simplify this any further for room-temperature IQ subhumans.
>>
>>700196
Wait i meant to say lefists, all politics are starting to look the same to me, because everyone is a raging moron.
>>
>>700197
You generalized first, dude. I was talking about porn because you were talking about everything adult related. Don't even try and bend this shit. You're too much of a fedora wearing "scientist" to acknowledge how retarded you sound.

Still waiting.
>>
This guy is either a massive troll, or a massive retard.
>>
>>700155
I've bleeped out your entire post and only kept the juicy bits anon.
It reads almost like a limerick of sorts:

>assholes cumbrains
>autistically cumbrains
>beat dick smut lewd art
>cumbrain lewd

>edgy teenagers, god forbid

>shit taste incel
>smut le eric
>fragile egos shit artist
>cumbrains don't get enough blood flow


It's entirely possible that this is your subconscious speaking anon.
there's def some themes of erectile dysfunction in there, if so I can comprehend the source of your anger towards this topic.
>>
File: jc-denton.jpg (16 KB, 603x393)
16 KB
16 KB JPG
>>699500
Days later, front page still filled with titillation with no evidence to support your claims
maybe you're just shit
>>
>>700225

Type in smut. Click on the pic called Gotham Smut. What happens.
>>
File: chrome_ogLqTD8Fgh.png (247 KB, 475x281)
247 KB
247 KB PNG
>>700155
Jesus, being a cumbrain can't be as bad as being you. I bet you're an absolute riot at parties. Look no further for proof that sexy art and fetishistic porn have been an objectively positive force in society by mellowing out millions of anal spergos like this. Should've dived your dad's drawers for his copy of big booty bitches when you were younger, now all you seem to care about is angst and cum whether you realize it or not.

I hope Artstation gets even more tits, DESU.
>>
>>700203
>the absolute state of cumbrain reading comprehension
Keep waiting cumbrain, maybe your IQ will drop some more.
>>
>>700233
Could it be that the author deleted the work?
>>
>>700254
I sure will. Good luck with your thesis. Retard.
>>
The mobile app got removed off the appetite for having some kind of NSFW stuff so to get it back on they don't show NSFW stuff on the mobile app anymore
>>
>>700325
>they don't show NSFW stuff on the mobile app anymore
Good. At least somebody thinks of the children.
>>
>>700330
Fuck the children.
>>
I want to die.
>>
File: DO77SKKU8AADk-3[1].jpg (258 KB, 1200x788)
258 KB
258 KB JPG
>>699914
t.
>>
>>699572
Do they have ads?
90% of corps don't advertise unless your site is family friendly.
>>
>>700082
You are descendants of puritanism. People who failed in their teenage years to grow up and confront the funny feelings and their nature as adult sexual beings and instead supressed it as an attempt to stay children at brain. It is very similar to manchildren who have aversion of "adulting" and just want to play with their toys and videogames all day.

Your hang ups and psychosises surrounding sex come from a long history of these hang ups, generation upon generation, and are as good as genetic at this point.
Flags may change but the impulse of sex and sexuality being icky and yucky will forever be part of the American cultural damage.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.