who of you fuckers requested adding pubic hair in the blender developer stream today
This is fake, isn't it? I mean, all hair in Blender looks like pubes by default.
>>679659>This is fake, isn't it?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRKcoUvPxDA&feature=youtu.be&t=2443they tried to ignore it though
>>679659One of those things once you see it, you can't unsee it. I really hope they fix it.
>>679659>>679697>>679727>I lack talent therefore the tool is bad
>>679730Too bad none of the Blender open movies had hair that good, and just had pubes instead.
>>679653hafl minute after that:>"Devs, when will you implement Chuck Norris?":^)
blender is leading software in pube sims
>>679730more like the tool can't keep up with the level of my talent and isn't worth my time
>>679816>more like the tool can't keep up with the level of my talent and isn't worth my timeHOHOHO
>>679730Self-intersecting braids aren't exactly a show of talent.
>>679727>>679659This hair look nice
>>679868That's strange as the worst thing in that picture is the hair.
>>679653they are up againhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yX3e2s8FECY
>>679868What the fuck
My god why does blender suck so hard
>>679868Why does everything have these same eyes mouth shape and teeth and not forgetting the tumblr nose.
>>680587There's no danger of bankruptcy over their heads if they screw up.
>>680589copying pixar is the calarts style of 3d
>>680587because its freeware, just like krita its absolute ass
>>680593Just like Linux, then?
>>680587we're waiting for you to help us developr8 my vertex proportional weight coloring patch
>>679659How you manage to accumulate enough STDs to make your pubes look like this while also remaining a virgin is a scientific marvel
>>680622that's sexy af
>>680622>>680639uhhh wtf is this the kind of stuff blendlets have to get excited over?
>>680639So Blender doesn't have a fall-off visualizer yet? Please tell that's not the case...
>>680656they're too busy with the important stuff
>>680659this can't be real hahahahahhaa
>>680649No, nobody cares.>>680656You don't really need it since you can just see what is moving, so yeah.
>>680662>You don't really need it since you can just see what is movingThe point is to be able to see what's going to move before initiating the operation. It's most useful for setting the fall-off curve.
>>680659>"Must protect people from their dirty minds."Is this before or after that guy in the live video asking for more pubes in Blender?
>>680661Cuz it isn't. Spheres were always called spheres.
>>680668>to see what's going to move before initiating the operationhow is that any different from seeing what is actually moving?
>>680906I feel like I must be missing something basic here, as it should be obvious why previewing the fall-off is useful. Capture related.
>>680924Ah, ok, I misunderstood your previous post. You're right.
>>679835I really wish I got to see how shitty your fucking art is.
>>680949Is it relevant? What if I can't do better than self-intersecting braids, as well?