last thread hit the bump limit >>659820show us what your'e working onpost questions here
I just finished my first "render" after 35 hours of hard work and the guidance of my master, Andrew Price. I couldn't add the sprinkles on the plate because they would spawn under it as well and the weight painting didn't help. This bad boy took 90 minutes to render, it's a shame that I had to underscale it because 4channel wouldn't let me upload it. Rate it.
noob to blender here, what's the best way to go about making this sword's blade? what tools should I use?
>>664252I also want to know this. Also what plugin has the length? That shit is dope.
Currently trying blender coming from 3ds max,why the fuck is that shit not even all the way around.reeee
>>664252follow basic tutorials, you will get the idea on how to make anything
>>664256I think measurement stuff is built in, or at least shipped with Blender
>>664261alright, looked up some info and made the shape using verts, filled the object and everything is fine and dandy until I try and apply a subdivision surface. any idea what i'm doing wrong?
>>664271it's one huge n-gon.2.79: alt-p -> poke faces2.8: search -> poke faces or triangulate faces
>>664280ctrl-n recalculate normals and try again
>>664271Topology. You have to cut up your piece into something that looks a little like pic related. Make it a bunch of quads and it'll subdivide nicely around curved surfaces like that. Use [I] to inset a face and then push it out to your liking.>>664277Are you kidding me? Triangles don't subdivide well, especially as a triangle fan.
>>664282If you cut it with the knife tool you can subdivide offending areas by hand. I think we're doing it wrong, famalam.
>>664286neither does that travesty you just posted
>>664286tried that, same issue
>>664286>>664291Cleaned up, my example. Note that at the sharp edges it's still a quad, the two vertices are just really close to each other.>>664289>the most goddamn crude line drawing in the world>that's not gonna workUh, yeah.
>>664294add.: if you want to do the flat part, repeat the same process just following the inner curve. Make sure the two have the same number of vertices, then do bridge edge loops (LoopTools function, addon's built into Blender).Bevel the edges ever so slightly afterwards so subsurf doesn't make the thing one huge amorphous blob.
>>664298You have multiple triangles. Try to avoid them when doing subd modelling. Rule of thumb: Quads only. There are exceptions, but they mostly don't apply here.Secondly, don't solidify it whatsoever. Keep it as a plane. Make sure that plane subdivides nicely, then move on to giving it another dimension. Follow what I posted in >>664297. Remember to delete the faces of the edge section just leaving the outer wire before you bridge your edge loops to the flat section. Internal faces don't play nicely. Apply the same concept when filling out the faces of the flat section, all quads, no triangles.And your normals are still flipped. Press W, Flip Normals. Otherwise, T panel, Shading / UVs, Normals: Recalculate / Flip Direction.
Took a 64x64 grid and deleted 50% of the vertices to outline, then manually moved like 700 to trace the profile. 0/10
>>664309Naw dude. Dude naw.Start with a smol cube on the right of the blade, then keep extruding to the left in small steps to make the blade.
>>664310I'm bad at this game sensei.
is there a tutorial on how to properly do this?
>>664319your'e not bad, you just lack experience.watch thishttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eBjcJSuFqwand this if you got the ballshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcCXM5zCuc0
>download blender 2.8>try it>looks good>just black screen
>>664370>>664371First of all it's important to know that 2.8 now requires a GPU that supports opengl 3.2 (I think it's 3.2, not sure). Though that would most likely just cause Blender to fail to open if you don't meet that requirement.If you do have a modern GPU, try loading factory settings (in the file menu). If the problem persists make a bug report here:https://developer.blender.org/
>>664373i have opengl 4.3.
>>664373blender doesn't care.https://blender.stackexchange.com/questions/128673/viewport-in-blender-2-8-is-all-black-no-problems-with-2-79b
anyway. why is this board so slow?
>>664377Well, 4chan's a niche site as far as things go, and 3D's a niche hobby/career too, so you put a niche in a niche and you get a really slow place.
>>664294thank you so much for the help anon, looks great
>>664179Trying to make it as photo-realistic as possible, it's meant to go for a real estate advertisement I'm making for university.
>>664387Good luck selling a stucco couch gayboi.
>>664390It's polystyrene foam, fagget.
>>664387Total noob here:The light seems a bit harsh, especially considering it's going through those curtains. It also isn't bouncing nearly enough. I feel like the room should be like 70% brightly lit.
>>664396Can you specify what you mean by harsh?>I feel like the room should be like 70% brightly litDo you mean that the room in general should be brighter or that the light should be illuminating 70% of the room?I also have my doubts about the light, I'm currently fixing it and rendering from different angles.>>664390It's cotton, I scaled the UVs since it looked better at the time, I'm also considering letting it have it's natural, real scale. I could later do a close-up of the couch so that one could see the beautiful material that is this cotton.
>>664399>I'm also considering letting it have it's natural, real scaleDo it. If you are going for photorealism, you want it to be as close as possible to nature. In a photo, you wouldn't ordinarily see the material texture from such a distance. In a render of this type you shouldn't, either.
>>664399On the light hitting the floor you can see very sharp angles, going through those curtains I think it should be much more diffused. Think a clear lightbulb as compared to a coated lightbulb (called soft usually, where the ID is coated with a fine white powder.)I think whatever lamp you're using is mostly just too close, but I don't know how you'd go about enhancing the bounce without having to redo all the shaders.
>>664404In that image I'm using an HDRI image and a Sun light, I can get softer shadows by increasing the size of the sun but I have no idea how to get softer ones with the HDRI.It's my first time hearing about adjusting the bounce, would you have a tutorial or point me somewhere? Currently I'm using an area light covering the entire back wall, it's color is an HDRI image of an interior.
>>664401You're right, I was hyped about the materials.I feel like the outer curtains aren't photorealistic enough, it's probably the way they fold, I should adjust that too.
>>664407>Currently I'm using an area light covering the entire back wall, it's color is an HDRI image of an interior.Now with this, the floor doesn't have enough reflections, I'll fix it so that the wood looks better.Does the area light have a power falloff? Or is it like the sun that illuminates every surface it touches with the same strength? I'm leaning to blame the area light.
>>664179is there any way to import a live camera feed? I was hoping to try real time video compositing or 3d motion capture for live streams but maybe im just too naive to know thats impossible. even the lowest quality would be fine.
How do I turn these triangles into quadrangles?
>>664477Knife like so and then delete the stray edge to reface. There's probably a better way but I don't know it.
>>664477is that the blender guru tutorial?also try the remesh modifier
>>664479The knife thing dindu well because it causes some other problems with the geometry above. Top is the original geometry from above. Then in mid you can see that the knifing in the bottom magically joins the edge that already existed (I used the snap with C to draw it in a straight line though), and in bottom you can see the knifing from above; it formed a weird pattern even though I drew it as a straight line.>>664480>is that the blender guru tutorial?Yes.>also try the remesh modifierI will look into it.
We want the technology on the set to have a more gritty feel. Upon searching the NASA archives for their Mission Control consoles from the Apollo era we find the look we are going for.Luckily we found a diagram of the stations and projected one onto a UV for layout purposes. We will model the hardware based on these references.At ease. It took us all night to get our bridge model set up for the retrofit. Our next task is to build the hardware, switches and toggles in a way that makes the equipment arrays look compartmentalized. Emphasizing human ingenuity within the set itself. This has been your Starfleet update.
>>664510The triangle is on the bottom of a non-deforming mesh. It literally could not matter less to have it there.
Made this mesh from a curve, but now there are no edge loops. Is there a way to make them or do I need to create them manually?
>>664527It's not worth continuing. Cut your losses, start over. Either box model it or sculpt it.
>>664527you fucked up big time. when you work with curves/splines like that you need to have very few verts since you can use bezier to make smoother lines. why in gods name do you have so many verts tho?
>>664528I wouldn't say there are losses, it's just an extruded curve made in 10 mins. Are you saying I used a wrong technique for this sort of work?
>>664529I dunno, it just how it converted from curve to mesh.
>>664532yup i know where you fucked up. you had the preview resultion high, giving you all those segments when you convert to poly. basically its just a permanent subdivsion. do that bezier agian. but this time keep the preview to 1. add a subdivision but dont apply it. just model with the lower poly one.
>>664540Huh, interesting. Thanks!
Anyone can explain me why it gives me that orange box when I try to do the difference between that fucking cylinder and the shape under it and sometimes it doesn't?Made a mug earlier and had the same thing happening, I had to restart Blender so it could work but I need to understand.
>>664547works fine for me. i used the modifier tho, blender addons suck.
>>664550It doesn't do it all the time. Like right now, I just decreased that cylinder's height and it worked (before it was a longer one that was going trough that sphere all the way down).I don't know, I'll just keep going.
>>664554why even use boolean operations in blender? blender is weak in that area.
>>664556I'm following a course and the part I reached is on booleans.But I don't know, I'm having trouble with Blender's interface in the first place and that's my main problem for now.Like that tab that appears in the bottome left corner of the window when you add a mesh to the scene. How do you get it back when it's gone because you translated something?It might be because I never done any 3D modeling and that I care only for animation but that shit is confusing as fuck.
>>664527what a fucking mess>>664559you can only change it once. its not supposed to be changed if you already changed it
>>664559>Like that tab that appears in the bottome left corner of the window when you add a mesh to the scene. How do you get it back when it's gone because you translated something?If you want that sort of functionality, sorry, Blender is not for you. It's available (with differing degrees of reliability) in, at least, 3ds Max, Maya, and Houdini.
>>664564so he should download a 20gb software because he forgot to adjust the number of edges on a primitive?
>>664566He should use the tools that better fit his needs.
>>664564>>664561I don't think you understood what I meant. How is that possible that a tab just disappears and that you're supposed to nail the raidus, size and everything related to tab of your mesh.I meant pic related.
>>664569Consider if you made modifications after you'd started modelling, it just wouldn't work in a lot of cases. Other than the actual geometry sudivisions you can accomplish just about anything you're hoping to in edit mode.
>>664575No seriously I don't get why it wouldn't work. But I kind of believe that it might cause problems, I just don't see why.I'll just continue learning maybe I'll understand later.Thanks.
>>664577Do a fucked up weird boolean real quick and throw a subsurf on it, the way it calculates where to divide gets all fucked up, to a smaller extent the N-gons on a cylinder top will fold in to do the same shit without edge loops and an inset.Principally you'd be doing the same thing altering the geometry like that. For primative modeling it'd be fine, but for anything beyond that it'd just fuck things up.
>download the newest 2.8 beta version>still get black viewporthere are my specs.
>>664235It looks beautiful. Nice job!
>>664579>106 °CI hope that's just a defective sensor
>>664569Yeah, I know you're referring to that, hence what I said earlier. That's a peculiarity of Blender; if you want to make changes to a primitive after you do anything else, you cannot go back to that panel. In other software, you have either nodes or a stack which you can change at any time, and those modifications propagate down the chain. Granted, sometimes it doesn't work well, but the functionality is there, and it's useful early during the creation of a model.
>>664579>Intel HD GraphicsTry getting a GPU.
>>664569you will modify that plane 1000 times, what does it matter what kind of settings it starts with?the only settings you should change is the edgecount on a cylinder.
>>664559you literally can not get that option back. it only exists just after you add the mesh. and if you need to add more edges to your cylinder or whatever you can do it manually by using edge select mode and then selecting around and using the subdivide command in the specials menu (w key)
https://blenderartists.org/t/i-received-a-death-threat-today/1110392Holy shit, look how big of a baby the mods at blenderartists are. What a total faggot...Blender is for people with a victim mentality. They think Autodesk is bad because it's a *gasp* corporation. In fact, they think all ownership is wrong. That's why it's so popular in socialist countries and reddit.
>>664751Why are you bringing up a post from blenderartists from a year ago and bitching about it here?And what gives you the right to talk shit while doing this crap?
>>664752the level of autism and depravity on this board is incredible
>>664760It's a board with a whole general devoted to Blender. What else would you expect, honestly.
Is it possible to render using an HDR for lighting but with a solid color as background? I know you can export it with transparent background and then add a background in photoshop or whatever, but is it possible to do it all in one step? Also, how would you guys go about making a pure black material using cycles?
>>664765>Is it possible to render using an HDR for lighting but with a solid color as background?that negates the whole idea of hdr, its image-based lightning.your model absorb light and reflection from the background, pure black does not.
>>664765>Is it possible to render using an HDR for lighting but with a solid color as background?Yes. It depends on the render engine, but usually, the environment shader has an option to disable the visibility of the background. This way, the HDRI lights the scene, but it doesn't appear on the background -- it stays black.>Also, how would you guys go about making a pure black material using cycles?I don't know exactly about Cycles, but look for an equivalent to a reflectivity setting, and set it to 0. Another option might be to make it purely emissive as black.
This is driving me nuts. Every time I try to parent the box object to those 3 vertex, the box jumps to a new place. Trying to move it back doesn't help much because the movement axis mess up for some reason.What am I doing wrong? What can I do to ensure the box stays in place after vertex parenting?
>>664782It should give you some options when you parent the objects with ctrl+p. Try keep transform or one of the options. If it does not help maybe try ctrl+a on the box before you parent it to apply location, rotation and scale.
>>664370Holy fuck look at all this screen clutter. It makes me want to cry. Instead of fixing real issues they fuck up the gui.
>>664785It works fine and any part your don't want can be disabled in the Overlays options. They're just making it more accessible to new people with visible buttons and gizmos.
>>664765You can put a background node into the lower part of the mix node if you want to see something.The transparent option in the film panel on the right is how you get a transparent background.
>>664783It didn't work, but thanks mate. Eventually after messing with origins and other stuff I got it to work just the way I wanted and then decided to undo it to see if I could recreate it and learn the steps with no luck.Also the "Keep transform" checkbox doesnt seem to work properly. Shit breaks after pressing it once.
im playing around with texture painting and it is doing this weird semi mirroring effect. i have the symmetry boxes turned off. it seems like some sort of artifact of the uv sphere. can anyone give any insight?
>>664849Check your UV map.
>>664850thanks. yeah it looks like its mirroring the body but not the "caps". still no idea how to solve it though
>>664850thanks again, after manually unwrapping the problem went away. I guess the default uv map accidentally just uses the same data for both sides or something.
>>664797I think you can use an empty object as an intermediate in some very dumb (clever?) way.
>>664782It's due to their origins. Take a look at the dots in your image, the red dot and the orange dot. They're both oriented relative to global (0,0,0), but when you parent the orange dot to the red dot, the position of the orange box moves to be relative to that of the red dot, no longer the global 0s.To simplify it, let's remove two dimensions. We start at 0. Orange is 2 spaces away from start and Red is 3 spaces away from start. When you ask Orange to parent to Red, Orange is now 2 spaces away from *Red*. This means orange is now *5* (or 1, depending on how you look at it) spaces away from start.You can solve this in Blender by making both object origins identical. Ctrl+Shift+Alt+C will set new origins. They can be anywhere, as long as they're the same.
>spent another 3 hours today trying to model shit to no availwhere do i go after the donut tutorial i'm at a loss of what to do to improve
>>664884To the anvil tutorial retard. To every other tutorial on the Internet.
I don't know how to ask this so I'll need to write a big explanation first, sorry.I know of two methods to "duplicate" UV unwraps for certain parts of meshes:1) Unwrap a parr and then duplicate it (through mirroring, shift+d, etc). The duplicates will share unwraping.2) If you didn't unwrap before duplication, you can also unwrap them all and then manually match the vertices of the unwraps (takes a lot of time).My case. I have modeled a building. It uses many wood beams of different sizes. I'd like the beams to share the same UV and texture. Question: is there a way to make them easily share UV map (same texture for all beams) without having to manually set each vertex?
I'm a beginner, trying to get into modeling after trying and giving up many years ago.How do I get over my anxiety on keeping my models symmetrical, or is it bad to begin with?For example, I'm currently modeling something based on a sphere/cylinder, and I notice that the shape is subtly squashed on one axis and not easily fixable with a scale, and it's making me uncomfortable.Somewhat related, are there any resources related to cleaning up models?
>>664967are you using a mirror modifier?
>>664971I did not, because it looked a bit daunting when I first saw it, I also wanted to work on something from the ground up first.Not sure if it will help much at this point anyway.
>>664967You need psychotherapy and medication, not more 3d tutorials.
In cycles, how can I make an object that shades based on the distance to whatever’s behind it? I don’t need scattering and stuff for my water, just a fade to blue.
>>6649733d tools are meant to help you, not test you.as a long time blender user, id rather not model a screw from 0 and use the screw modifier instead. if it helps you just use it
>>664990you will need to program this.
>>664990>I don’t need scattering and stuff for my water, just a fade to blue.Use absorption towards blue.
>>664997Absorption only works for solid objects though, I was just wanting a single face that assumes an infinite object depth behind it.
>>665005Wouldn't it work to just make a box? After a certain depth, it will turn to pure black/blue. Or that's how I understand absorption to work, at least.
>>664868As dumb as that sounds, it worked. Thanks anon!
>>664872Thanks for the expIanation. I tried something similar to what you are suggesting, but it didn't work. I simplified the parenting to two cubes without translation and same result. I even tried setting the origin to the middle of all the vertex and it twisted the cube anyway.Finally I tried to do the same operation in 2.79 and then it worked as intended. Even when messing with the origins the child didn't jump. This must be a bug in the beta.
>>664953Have you tried using "transfer UV maps"? You can find it with the spacebar search menu.You could also try the data transfer modifier.
>Codequest 2019 MAYBE about sculpting toolsBETTER MAKE THIS HAPPEN
>>665060I'll check that out, thanks.
>>665060>>665082Yep, that works perfectly, thanks a lot.
i figured out what that bevel weight shit is for, pretty cool.
>>664953The easiest way around something like this is to plan in advance. In other words, create one of those wood beams, unwrap it nicely, then duplicate it all over the place. It's a lot less hassle than trying to unwrap and manage duplicates after the fact.
Why did only half of the boolean work?
>>665103Looks like your normals are completely fucked in the first place. Remember, your model should look mostly grey with some blue, but not mostly blue with some black*. Enter edit mode and on your T panel, go to Shading / UV, recalculate normals.* - unless you've modified your OpenGL lighting setup in User PreferencesA reminder for working with booleans in Blender is to make sure the bounding boxes for the both objects are distinctly different. It looks like they are in your case, but bear in mind for the future. Add.: If you plan on subsurfing your final result, well, look up some tutorials on subd topology on curved surfaces if not you're going to have a topological nightmare on your hands.
>>665104Yeah, i recalculated normals outside and tried again, but got the same result.It did cut the shapes tho, and i can remove faces manually.
>>665106Ah, I see why now. You have clipping intersections. Seeing as how the opposite side doesn't have them (and note how the cuts there were perfect), you should properly center the object you're using to cut the shapes. You should probably also scale the object down a little just to be safe.
>>665107Ahah, yeah, noticed it too. Thanks for the tips!
>>664953i know you solved this problem but far as buildings go.if most of your building blocks are identical. you can model,unwrap,array. this is the best way to make something like a road or a building
Any tutorials/tips for making eevee more closely approximate the look of cycles? Of course it's not going to be exactly the same, but it seems by default lighting differences are huge. I want to just use eevee as a playblast to make sure things are looking ok, then to go ahead and use cycles, but as it stands, particularly with the lighting, this method would end up with scenes that are way too dark. Just cranking up the light seems a blind way to go about it, and if I'm using cycles to check the lighting then I may as well not use eevee.
>>664235models are fine.Lighting isn't very good. It looks like a LED panel next to the donuts. Think about the room and where the lighting would come from. Consider using a HDRI for lighting. Use Filmic Blender.Materials aren't very good. Have a look at a plate. Does it reflect the light like that? Same for your cup, it looks oddly metallic. Consider using the Principled BSDF shader, it makes it harder to make shitty materials and is pbr by default. Your table looks like a printed piece of paper, consider using at least a specular map.Scene is fine, but would benefit from some context that implies what is going on around or before the picture. Add some random newspapers and fallen-off sprinkles or something.
Soooo, the parts that were affected by boolean lost their edge loops, I can't create any.Is it normal, or...?
>>664752>And what gives you the right to talk shit while doing this crap?Free speech. And it's on topic. If you prefer censorship, go back to BA and stay there.
>>665122it can create massive ngons that make it seem like its missing edges.but that's what boolean is, you have to retopo this section
>>664884The CGCookie introduction to Blender. Ignore Andrew Price.
>>665118dude its still in beta, we don't even have documentation yet
>>665124YOU CANT MAKE ME*sigh*Okay...
>>665120>Your table looks like a printed piece of paper, consider using at least a specular map.>doesn't notice the very obvious bumps in the table, surely created with a mapThis is the kind of idiot browsing this board. Don't believe anything he said.
>>665138I can definitely see the bumps in the wood texture, more noticeable in the shadow of the plate. I know nothing of the other software he mentioned though. They may be very good or just a crouch for retards, but regardless, it's not the kind of thing you should get into when you're just starting.
First (shitty) attempt at an orange peel wall texture for an interior render. Gonna play with it some more later.
>>665118It's not that difficult to make them match, Cycles uses nodes for lamps, EEVEE doesn't, just change one of the properties to match the other.Oh, and don't use mesh or area lights, EEVEE can only do light sources from a point, so stick to point, spotlight, and sun lamps.
Anybody else ever notice how some of the most prominent members (semi-celebs) of the Blender community don't have portfolios and there is little evidence they know how to use the software creatively? The best you'll see is an arch viz render that borrows heavily from publicly available models and shaders. But all of them seem to think they know enough to create tutorials and even a few charge for it. I can't stand Blendlets.
>>665188Yeah, I would imagine almost all of them prioritize their content creation like recording/editing videos, maintaining a website, selling themselves, etc. over improving as more than beginner 3d artists.For Blender in particular, as a beginner it's easy to just absorb as much learning material from all directions, but as you start to know more about what you are doing there is a noticeable lack of more advanced information. Feels bad.
>>665193>as you start to know more about what you are doing there is a noticeable lack of more advanced informationThat's because that is the point where most people jump to higher-end software. Even if you plan on going back to Blender later (a lot of skills are transferable in both directions), there's simply much, much more learning material at the intermediate and advanced level for professional software.
>>665188that's because there are several layers of content creators on the community.1. tutors- those people will usually display their artwork as part of their examples. for example, andrew price is mostly posting his own tutorial result which are highly suspicious. but that's what you get with andrew price and blender guru. same applies to darine lile and other big celeb tutors like gleb.2.actual artists that skipped over to selling and teaching- you have people like Reynante Martinez that is responsible for the cycles material vault. or Pierrick Picaut that made the tutorial for the fantasy cliff tower.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAeghTiHmyc3.actual artists that might give commentary or do speed modeling video- in this list i can put max puliero and rico cilliers as people that mainly do art but sometimes give their own perspective on things. >>665194>there's simply much, much more learning material at the intermediate and advanced level for professional software.that's true. but for the past 5 years there has been alot more expert tutorials for blender, something that wasn't acceptable before.pic unrelated, something silly i made ages ago
Guys, I need some halp.I use bezier curves with bevel objects to make hair strands. When I add alpha to them to get the tips nicely faded out, the front is perfect but the backside seems to have black artefacting in it so I guess it's a normals problem.Is there a way to make all sides transparent without converting the whole thing into standard mesh? I kinda want to keep it editable, hence I want to keep the beziers intact.
>>665199provide pics plozz
>>665200There's not a lot going on to show, actually. This is the backside I'm talking about. The opposite side is perfectly smooth and transparent without the black part.
>>665202It looks like you might have a color ramp plugged in wrong.
>>665204Checked everything again and doesn't seem like it. As I said, that black area only appears when I view it from that side. If I can't find a solution, I'll convert the beziers to mesh but yeah, would be a bummer since otherwise it works really nicely.
>>665209> that black area only appears when I view it from that sidebut what happens when you render it?
>>665213Screenshot was low samples (20) cycles preview but actually rendered at 500 or more doesn't solve it neither. Pretty much looks the same as in the preview
>>665209This is the tutorial that taught us how to shade bezier curves. It teaches transparency on the ends of the curve.https://youtu.be/t2XjdzzWCqI
>>665216That's the one I followed but as you can see, in his case the hair endings are only visible from the front with his hair style and the back either not visible or hidden. I wonder if his hair also has those dark parts when he'd have some free floating hair, visible from all sides.
>>665218Looking at the shader derived from the same tutorial there does not appear to be the issue you are having...
>>665218My best guess would be that you have a hair curve in which its direction starts at the bottom and goes up while the remaining curves start from the top and go down. That may explain it.
>>665218Each curve has a flip direction option. You might have triggered one by mistake.
Can someone tell me what in THE FUCK Blender is doing here?
>>665249Dynotopo is active and I bet your resolution setting did it. You can thank me later.
>>665249Dyntopo is active and your resolution is too low.
>>665250Yeah Dynotopo is supposed to be on?I'm trying to do this thinghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lj643VmTsgbut when I turn on absolute detail and start sculpting it turns to shit. So...wtf?
>>665249>>665252works fine for me?
>>665253Probably cause you're using 2.79
>>665254so then revert?
>>665255No. I'm specifically trying to get used to 2.8 cause it has so many little improvements that make everything easier. Beside, when I use it on a cube (like you probably did), it seems to work fine. For the icosphere I have to use resolution 60 to get it to work similarly, so why the fuck does the guy in the video say 6? Is it the developers fucking up in the meantime?
>>6652562.8 is so good visualizing the model in the work space.
>>665256IIRC they flipped the meaning of resolution in 2.8 for who knows. I guess it's more intuitive, larger number = higher resolution rather than smaller = higher than in <2.79.
>>665258So why does the guy in the video still say (and type) 6 and it works? Did they change it in the time since the tutorial?
>>665258>>665256>>665259huh? it works fine for me still.
>>665260Good for you then. I have no idea what's going on with mine.
>>665261you fucked up somewhere on your end. i literally just installed 2.8, added a icosphere and turned on dynatopo.
>>665262Yeah I'm pretty sure I didn't cause I did the exact same thing. And going by youtube comments I'm not the only one with this problem.
>>665263Noticing now that if I do dynatopo on a plain, I need to up the resolution to 200 to get the same effect as the 60 on the sphere. What the hell is up with this program?
>>665265Redownloaded from the website since apparently there's now a newer version...dynatopo still needs 60 as input, but now it works on the plain with the same setting.
>>665267Using that caller during an emergency must be fun.
>>665269Welp, or not, as the case may be. Can a file be corrupted? I suppose it must be. Fuck this, I'm going to bed.
>>665269>dynatopo still needs 60 as input>>665265>I need to up the resolution to 200 to get the same effect as the 60 on the sphereim on 3 and it still works fine?
>>665272Mate I don't fucking care. GOOD FOR YOU, THAT DOESN'T HELP ME A BIT.
>>665273you should because its on your end youre fucking up, not the program, m8.
>>665274THAT STILL DOESN'T HELP ME
>>665273Try applying scale (Ctrl+A) before sculpting.
>>665275yes it does lmao, youre just too fucking stupid to deduct shit. learn how to use your fucking brain. if its working fine for me you have several options1 reinstall the software 2 reset user preferences considering you have your ui's color changed to white for god knows whyand if its still doesnt work at that point then the problem extends to your OS, not the program.
>>665278there is a trend of people that use tools without watching tutorials on how to operate them
>>665308brainlets watch vids tho. vids just relay(sometimes they make up their own shit) what they picked up from the manual/index. you would waste more time looking at a vid than just lookin it up on the index.
>>665311it gives you a sequence on how to perform certain tasks.
>>665311Videos demonstrate practical use cases for features, tools, and settings.Also binging tutorials at 1.5-2x speed is easy.
>>665341>>665354i can assure thats not how that works.
>>665278>haha I don't have any problems so obviously you're stupidThis is on the same level of obnoxiousness as looking for a solution to some problem and the only answer being an entry on some forum that reads>sent you a pm
>>665277Hm, afraid that didn't work. Made resolution 3 pretty fine detail though.Did some further testing. If I leave the sphere just as it is without scaling it up, the resolution picker tells me it's 3, so 6 gives the desired results.If I scale it up by 10 though, the resolution is now 30, so apparently that scales along now? Don't know if that was always like that.
I want to model and rig and animate a character. Then I'd like to use those animations for other characters I create. I think you can use reuse animations. My question is: is there anything I need to do before I rig and animate the first character to make sure the animations will work with future characters? Some pain I can relieve from my future self by taking some step now. Or can I just go ahead, and transfer them later on without much issue?
>>665376>My question is: is there anything I need to do before I rig and animate the first character to make sure the animations will work with future characters? Some pain I can relieve from my future self by taking some step now.It's more of a jump than a step, but once you do it you'll never look back. Switch to Maya.
2 min model and render Wallpaper to test the Eevee rendering engine.
>>665376I was starting to type out a detailed response before realizing it would be wasted. How about you go learn about all the steps first, get to your rigged character, and then once you understand how it all works, you can ask this question again. Trust me, if you're trying to share animations like the way you described you'll be rebuilding your rig many times, so just consider the first one a throwaway.
on this thing, but cant get to put the textures right.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA FUCKKKKKKK2.80 is so fucking TEMPTING but sculpting is so much slower on it and still lacking a couple important addons that aren't updated yet. Tested the most recent release and it really comes along nicely.Switching back and forth between 2.79 and 2.80 is shit but fuck is it tempting.
>>665404Also, it seems like CPU rendering got improved a fuckton on cycles.I tested 2.80 and suddenly my third gen i7 is almost as fast as my two 750Ti rendering together.
>>665402Well, I already have the model. There are many tutorials on how to rig and animate, but I've done quick scrolling through them to see if they tackle the issue and they see to focus on jusg that character. My worry is I'll do that character and then I'll have to repeat the process if I want to transfer animations.I wouldn't ask for a long response, but could you point me in the direction of a course or tutorial where they teach how to build for re-usability? Would be most appreciated
>>665355>guy who doesn't watch vids and instead reads the manual can't model for shit>people who watch vids don't have the lame problems he does>therefore watching videos is uselessUninstall the program mate. Not only are you dumb, your attitude and your willingness to change it are wrong too. Just give up and uninstall it, you'll never amount to anything anyway.
Question. In the anvil tutorial Andrew introduces the concept of a flow that connects all faces in a 'grid', they all have a column and a row, and these connect forming a cycle. I can see how this matters because as long as this property is met for all faces, all of them are quadrangular, therefore artifacts don't pop up on the texture and shit. But let's say that I can make a mesh where everything is still quadrangular, but the flow of the rows and columns is interrupted in many places. Would this be bad? Why? Does it take more power to render?
>>665431its just bad habits vs. good habits.basically when you subdivide an object you want that perfect uniformity and quads that are in the same size and structure.ps. guys please give the anvil/dognut tutorials a rest. try different things from different creators
>>665435>ps. guys please give the anvil/dognut tutorials a rest. try different things from different creatorsRelevanthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUf9VltV4Cc
>>664782Why on earth would you ever want to parent a box to some vertices?? In the same object, even?What are you trying to achieve here?
>>665062Sculpting is fine - What we need is proper texturing tools.Fuck, I'd be so happy if Blender got basic layer blending and generators in a simple menu, like in SP.
>>665404Sculpting is much faster and smoother in 2.8, what the fuck are you talking about?It's pretty much the ONLY good thing about 2.8, apart from a nicer viewport.
>>665474>>665450and 2.80.both around 750k and I'm not the only one who has mentioned that, the forums are full of questions about sculpting optimization
>>665474>>665475That's very strange.I was sculpting this just yesterday, and it was getting a bit slow on 2.79, but when I switched to 2.8 it got buttery smooth.
>>665477depends on many things. maybe your hardware is beefy enough to make use of the new underlying architecture. from what I've heard is that 2.80 overall is more streamlined for newer hardware while 2.79 can't use some performance tricks of new hardware.
>>665478Ah, that could be it. I was using my desktop, and I have a 1080 and a 7700K in it. Perhaps it would be a different story if I used my laptop.
>>665481most likely! I guess at this point it isn't that noticeable with good hardware if you stay at reasonable resolutions and project sizes but if you have mid range 2014 stuff you really notice it at small projects.on the other hand edit more is a lot faster in 2.8 on my machine so it makes it kinda difficult for me to switch yet. both have almost even pros and cons at this point but since 2.80 keeps improving it's just a short time problem. also, really hope the codequest is about sculpting this year!
>>665485But there's not much more to do about sculpting in Blender, other than optimize for lower end computers?I would much, much rather have real texturing tools in Blender, now that SP is being eaten up by Adobe.
>>665488>But there's not much more to do about sculpting in Blender, other than optimize for lower end computers?Oh there is a fuckload of interesting shit that can be done.If Blender actually achieves getting CLOSE to what you can do in Zbrush, it would be a total gamechanger. There are plans to get blender to handle truckloads of millions of polies at some point. Also, rapid shape creation inside sculptmode in combination with booleans and so on.But you're right, texturing tools might even be more important. It's kinda silly that you need a pay-addon so that you finally get PS-like layers per texture.
>>665491>There are plans to get blender to handle truckloads of millions of polies at some point.For that to happen you'd need a semi-2D engine like Zbrush has. Seems a bit far-fetched.>Also, rapid shape creation inside sculptmode in combination with booleans and so on.Already works fine in Blender afaik - just not inside sculpt mode.>It's kinda silly that you need a pay-addon so that you finally get PS-like layers per texture.Yeah. Blender already has all the fundament needed. You can blend materials, you can paint with brushes, you can separate channels and run edge detection stuff... but all has to be set up manually through nodes. Every single aspect of it, for every single layer. If that was just streamlined properly, I don't think I'd ever need Substance Painter again.
What I find strange is that the guy who proposed GIF related just vanished AND his Blender wiki account got wiped too!https://blenderartists.org/t/gsoc-2017-silhouette-brush/690576https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/User:Witt/GSoC2017/Development_StatusI mean if you're just busy you don't fucking delete your account and just vanish without saying anything. Wtf
>>665494Just saw that the Wiki apparently got an overhaul so that older links are just broken. So I guess there's still hope after all!https://developer.blender.org/p/Witt/
Any way to convert this selection to face, like in Maya?Also is there any way to turn off back face culling while trying to select vertices behind the mesh while in solid view mode?I'm currently constantly switching back and forth between wireframe and solid and it feels really clunky (I'm a dumbass and can't work very well in x-ray or wireframe mode)
>>665523create face shortcut is F.
>>665526>>665523Sorry, convert to face as in convert my edge loop selection into a selection of adjacent faces, like this
>>665530Ctrl (numpad +)
>>665531nice!thanks a bunch.
2 pots of coffee already today. Over a pack for sure. The radio is playing blocks of rock so I guess it's okay.
Gentleanons, it has been a good night although not much shows. Putting the detail into this one because we have hi-res references. The panel layouts do repeat so I can reuse the geometry down the line. Fun, like knitting, but for a guy. Superbowl.... fuck that. I hope both teams lose.This has been your Starfleet update ...
>>665252>>665251>>665250So I found out about the whole "scaling your model in object mode scales the resolution too" thing, but if I scale in edit mode that makes a resolution 6 brush give super fine detail. So I have no idea what he does in the video that yields his results with what he claims he's using.
>>665659how are you still having problems with this, jesus christ youre a bigger brainlet than i thought
>>665660Fuck off if you don't have anything useful to contribute, you bacteria.
>>665265DUDE THAT'S BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T SET THE RESOLUTION TO CONSTANT
for the last few days been working on Hide the Pain Helen
Downloaded the latest 2.8.SHIFT + Z switches between wireframe and rendered now. Instead of solid and rendered.How do I switch it back?
>>665703Also, why doesn't anything show up in the node editor when I select a point light?
>>665703I just tap Z to switch with the pie menu. It's pretty fast if you hold and quickly 'flick' the cursor in the direction of the option you want. Got a question myself. How do I select bones in weight painting mode?
>>665448The bigger box has soft body physics, if I try to parent using the regular method, the child will not follow the parent during simulation.
We have phase shifted our spacial matrix and ended up on this forum. By this forum I mean being in orbit and connecting to the planets Internet by way of a coffee shop in the Dirty South.But before our ship goes over the horizon and we are forced to deal with China:sup.a little more geometry and we can run through the other panels more easily by means of duplicate.Your fading. See you in 90 minutes.
So I'm working on a car model (more accurately, making changes on an old car model I have on my external HDD), and I'm currently working on the shift knob. I'm trying to do something of an engraved number pattern, and I don't know how to get it to work. Should I use a texture? Or do what I'm doing with pic related and use the knife tool to directly carve the pattern into the knob?If the texture method, how should I go about it? With a bump map? A displacement map? A Normal Map?If I do end up using the knife tool method, how do I remesh it so it doesn't look like the ugly mess the picture shows?
>>665896You got a sphere: good. There will be two materials on it. The base color and the second is the base color with a .png image overlaid on top. I'm in Blender 2.8.Unwrap the top half of your sphere from the top view looking down on the sphere. When unwrapping use Project from View Bounds. Now you got a UV layout you can put into your PShop to figure out your knob image. Save it as a .png with the UV layer turned off. Remember to use an alpha background instead of white. Go into PShop or other layered paint program. Do your image, save it as a png.In Blender your shader material might look like the one at top.I am using bump maps but I seem to be unable to bump it up sufficiently. Hope that helps.Starfleet out.
>>665900I've tried the bump method before, and I suffered the exact same "unable to bump the texture intensity up" issue.
>>665903work on another part of the model. keep it fun. it will come to you.
Can any senpai tell me which materials are used on cars in this video? Noob desu, I downloaded a car model and playing with materials.
>>665911What are you expecting from this? Cars usually just have the coating and IOR tweaked. Im assuming you're doing this in cycles right?
>>665911Link the video anon, it'd be easier to make an educated guess if viewed in motion.
>>665900>>665896by the way you can just connect white/black texture to the displacement node and invert the bump if needed. its alot smoother than sculpting it
>>665896Use a displacement map if you care about seeing the grooves in a profile view. Otherwise, use a bump map or a normal map -- the difference is that a bump map encodes elevation, and a normal map only angle.If you use a displacement map, be sure to enable tessellation at render time or it won't work well.
>>665935So how do I go about it? Use a texture to make the map that way? Or go ahead and murder the mesh itself and export the result as a map?
>>665900Thats not how bump maps work lol. you cant have that image be both a color map and a bump map lmfao. Those two things are completely different, bump maps read specific rgb values.
>>665955>>665900also you cant map displacement maps(value bump maps) with PBR materials(principled). you have to exclusively use tangent spaced normals.
>>665952this is how i do it. there are various methods.notice how i get jpeg artifacts because its a jpeg image. so you might want to get a vector image or a high quality png
>>665956Will displacement maps work if you apply them as a mesh modifier? I have no idea how things work
>>665956you are somewhat right but also wrong.you probably talk about the original bump maps and how they used.in blender there is an option to use bump maps as height maps. as seen >>665958
>>665959Ditto, which is why I asked the initial question to begin with.>>665958Like I stated before, I did try that. But it didn't get to the level of deepness that I wanted it to look. Even after adjusting the sliders in the Bump node.
>>665961this is why you can add a math node and add power with numbers
>>665960nobody does this anymore tho, using displacement maps for bumps. displacements maps are now mostly used for geometry and not normal mapping. this is why when you export bump maps from substance the height channel(displacement) and normal channel get thrown into one channel and the height map gets its own texture map, just in case you wanted to use it to displace geometry. Just to be clear both displacement maps and normal maps do the exact same thing(rgb=normal,value=displacement, but now are applied differently, so displacement should never ever come up with texturing.also the reason the height map did't work for >>665900is because you're using a transparent background, there needs to be black and white values to determine height with displacement maps.But yeah i get it, the normal node lets you choose between height and normal. But again displacements are not normally used in texturing anymore.
>>665964good correction on the .png. My train of thinking would be to trace a nurbs path. But come ON!!! This is a gearshift! I mean ..... MYYYY GOOOOODDDDD!!!!Okay, had to get that out. I'm better now.
>>665962I'll try it and post results.
>>665952Yeah, you use a linear texture, usually in the range [0.0, 1.0], with 0.5 being no displacement. Then you feed that to a shader which takes said map and a range of displacement, for example, 0.01 units. The displacement will be applied according to those. But it requires a mesh of high enough resolution, so the render engine will tessellate the mesh to an acceptable degree, and then apply the displacement. I believe there is support for this in the latest 2.7x Cycles. This may be relevant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cbcV1_rgZg>>665958This setting, although correct, is for bump mapping. It's a shading "trick", it doesn't create real geometry. It's usually enough for non-hero assets, but if OP wants to have close shots of the gearshift, a bump map probably will not be enough.
>>665896Looks like you can shrink wrap a Text Object to a sphere. This Text origin is outside the sphere. I've tried converting to mesh and running a boolean but it's real dicey.
>>665709Use a hook?
>>665955That's wrong, faggot. A bumpmap is BW.You're thinking of a normal map, which is a completely different thing.
>>665972a bump map is both a normal and a displacement, I already explained this. a displacement is BW and a normal is RGB. in substance they both get exported into the same texture, so stfu.
>>665973That's... just wrong, Anon. In several respects.A displacement map is a BW map used for displacing geometry. A bump map is a BW map used for displacing light reflections. A Normal map also does that, but uses more color channels to also take into account 3D space and surface curvature.
>>665975No im not lmfao, bump maps are literally synonymous with displacement maps because they both use B&W to indicate depth. all the videos you will ever come across for bump maps are for DISPLACEMENT.
>>665980they do the same job but displacement modifies the geometry, bump only does a light trick (assuming we are in 1999)
>>665977This man deserves the honor. The software does level the playing field. Without his life's work I would still be on canvas with acrylics and oils. The world is a brighter place because of this man.
>>665981No displacement and bump maps dont do the same job wtf? they both use black and white values and thats it, one displaces geometry the other one is fake geometry. normals do it better than bump maps, so i dont know why you keep bringing up the old terminology for bump map, since its pretty clear that when we talk about bump maps we refer to normals.
>>665986A displacement map modifies geometry. A bump map modifies the way light is computed without altering the geometry, akin to the way a normal map works. There are also RGB displacement maps, which encode displacement along a vector. You can downgrade a displacement map, either of linear or vector type, to a bump map, and downgrade a bump map to a normal map. A normal map has less information than a bump map, so going in the opposite direction involves interpolation or artistic input. Going from a bump map to a linear displacement map is possible; not so from a bump map to a vector displacement map. Neither displacement, nor bump, nor normal maps ordinarily encode height information, so that value has to be additionally given to the render engine. An exception might be made for some displacement maps, if you take their encoded lengths as non-normalized units in your DCC of choice.
Starfleet signing out. Well, truckers, stay on the right side of the line.Catch you on the flip flop.
>>665969Yeah, I've tried the bump map method again, and I'm still suffering what's happening in the picture.Which is why I'm wondering how I'm able to do this without it looking like a huge mess.>>665970To further this, I've been using the knife tool for it on my knob, the result can be seen here (>>665896) as it was why I asked in the first place. The boolean wouldn't help because it'd just cut the holes, and not make it still look like the solid-looking object I want it to be.I haven't tried the displacement method yet simply because I don't know how to go about it. I attempted it with the same kind of texture as in the picture, but it looks like crap and I really don't want to subdivide it too much, otherwise it'll be too huge a load when trying to open it.
I would suck Ton Roosendal's dick.Blender has done so much for me. In the six or so years I've been using Blender now, I've learn to create so many things, it's given me a purpose in life and I've made a lot of money using Blender. I owe everything to him and the Blender community.
>>665993whats the problem then? seems like your shift knob has a weird shape to it and the engraving is too spread out. remember that in subdivision your unwrap might look bigger than usual so try to minimize the size.
>>665993(cont.)So I tried displacement, and this is my result. How do I fix this?
>>665995No, that's the look I'm trying to get here. And I did shrink the UVs before, and I got a similar result.
>>665997you can't shrink the UV, just delete the current UV and unwrap it on less vertices's .
>>665989>A normal map has less information than a bump mapLol, no
>>666000A normal map can be derived from a bump map. Clearly, if you know how the height of a surface varies, you can derive the normal at any point of that surface. The reverse is not true, as the normal map only has information about angle, and nothing about height.
>>666005Woop de doo, what a fucking retard you are.
>>666006Nice argument, m8.
>>665999Been trying that, same issues keep happening.
>>666009Also, side note: But using the adaptive displacement option keeps making my computer unresponsive for some reason. Any fixes other than to simply not use it until I get more memory?
>>666008A normal map contains at least three color channels, you retard. It contains far more information than a simple bump map. A bump map uses a black to white gradient to define up or down - that's it. A normal map contains info about how light should be reflected from all directions in relation to the underlying geometry.Bump maps are technology from 1972 - normal maps were first thought of in 1996.
I have a question concerning drivers. I want to drive the color of a node from one material with the color of a node from another material.Referring to the picture, my goal is to get the purple highlighted color field, which is currently black, to become blue, effectively copying the blue color from the BlueMaterial.But somehow I can't access the blue color from the other material. As you can see, the value is zero, but I'd expect it to copy the RGB values from the BlueMaterial.How do I access the color data of a node material???
>>666014Other solutions to copy colors from other materials are also much appreciated, maybe there is some node like 'copy color from another material' or something?
>>666014>>666015Okay guys, I got it to work using Node groups.https://blender.stackexchange.com/questions/16352/global-variable-node-across-multiple-materials
>>666011i can only offer help to technical issues, if you want artistic advice just be more specific.i tried the whole displacement thing myself just a few hours ago and it worked out fine.mind you, i had some shading issues but overall i had no issue stamping symbols on a sphere. like i said, you might have artifacting if you use a low quality image. it will translate every pixel
>>666021But that was technical anon. You quoted one of my posts griping about technical issues.But speaking of displacement, how do I get it so that it doesn't look like this nightmare? >>665996
>>666012Let me try to phrase it differently. A bump or height map typically encodes a normalized displacement value along the normals of a surface; that is, how much it goes up or down at any given point. When you consider this for all points of that surface, you have a reconstructed 3D surface with (usually) different heights across different areas. So, with a height map, you can go from a simple to a detailed surface. Also, if you wanted to, you could recreate a normal map from this surface; this map would be more or less the same as if you, in the first place, had baked a normal map from the detailed to the simpler surface.A normal map, however, only encodes vectors (where, say, R=x, G=y, B=z), with no information about height. So you have the normal vectors of a surface, but no information about how much it goes up and down, relative to a simpler surface, at any of its points. Where this difference is small and regular enough, using a normal map may suffice to fake detail. But if the differences in height between the simple and detailed surface are broad and irregular (meaning that there are noticeably different areas in terms of height), a normal map will fall short. You can still try to reconstruct a detailed surface from it, but this will result in a coarse approximation of a regular surface, just barely resembling the actual detailed surface that was used to create that normal map.See the image attached. The surface is such that the normals of the left and right planar areas are practically the same. However, the right area is at half the height of the left one. While in the baked normal map you can't see the difference (the angles of both areas appear as the same shades of blue), in the baked height map it's evident: the right area appears at lower values. This image, I expect, will serve as a visual demonstration of how a height map carries more information than the corresponding normal map.
>>666046i don't know what you consider a problem because problems are subjective. maybe spell it out and cross it in red?
>>666062I can't because it's a rendering problem that eats up all my RAM.
>>666064And the other issue I have (the shift knob itself) is already getting into a tangled mess that's turning more and more into a fight over what a bump map is.I'm just waiting for someone to actually give me a clear answer as to what to actually do.
>>666066do some areas of the render turn completely black? you can solve this by using the displacement instead of the bump node.OR your UV map doesn't have a defined borders, maybe you scaled it down/up too much.lower samples to 256 and activate denoiser, clamp direct to 1 clamp indirect to 3, disable caustics. you can also go to shading and change the background from sky to transparent to save RAM
Noobest of noobs here.Made a simple gold bar.Inb4 gif is glitched.
>>666066Try this. Enable the experimental Cycles feature set, add a subdivision modifier using adaptive subdivision, set displacement to true in the material settings, and control the displacement strength with a multiplier over the displacement map.It's been months since I last used Blender, so this may be inaccurate in some parts, but it's how I remember doing it. I assume things may have improved already with 2.8.
>>666069No, it's in the 3D viewport when I switch it over to rendered view.>>666115I've tried that, but not in the way you've laid it out. I'll give it a shot.
>>666123Okay yeah, it still wants to do this for some reason.How do I go about changing that?
>>666129what is this mushroom anon? what am i looking at? tell me whats the problem
>>666130Have you been reading the thread up to now?Because it seems like you haven't.
>>666129Can you post your displacement map? I'm guessing the issue has to do with the neutral value being white instead of middle gray (0.5).
>>666134Point is, I've been working on a car model and I'm having trouble modeling/texutring the gearshift knob. This is the result when I try using displacement and modeling is just as terrible.Plus an argument by several other people over what a bump map is.
>>6645792.8 still lacks proper support for a lot of hardware since they changed how the viewport works or some shit due to eevee. If it doesn't work in 2.79 it probably won't work in 2.8. If it does work in 2.79, then wait for it to release you retard. Or get a gpu for gpu tasks.
>>666138Ok, that seems like the cause of the issue. Try this one. It's been multiplied by 0.5, so what was white in the original will be 0.5 in this one and thus won't displace any geometry. You'll still have to reduce the strength of the map, as pure black leads to negative maximum displacement, which with defaults settings would be 1 Blender unit.
>>666140Trying it now, and I'm still seeing the same issues, the top of the knob expands like a mushroom cap.
>>666143Can you post the material nodes and the UV map?
>>666145I would, but I figured out my issue- I had two of the same material on the one object. 'Course now I'm back to it being nothing more than a glorified bump map.It works fine now that I deleted the duplicate. But just for fun, here's the node setup and UVs.
>>666154Cool, glad to see it solved.
>>666158But now I'm back to square one regarding it now being a bump map plugged into the displacement slot and not going any further than the picture shows it.Now how do I fix that so I can get a good groove into it?
>>665449sculpting is not fineblender sculpting is extremely tiring, is missing many great features zbrush gets and cannot handle large amounts of polygons
>>666161Kind of, if you're showing what my issue is.I'm looking for a fix tho. And so far none of them seem to either be working, or devolve into flame wars over how bump and normal maps are two different things.
>>666166>if you're showing what my issuewhat is your issue?
>>666167Trying to get a good grove into my mesh (as see here: >>666154) but not getting it to go much deeper than like, a barely a millimeter if that.
>>666169Multiply the strength of the displacement. I saw in your node setup that you are using Add instead of Multiply.With these settings >>666115 and this map >>666140, I get the pic attached. If I haven't forgotten anything, there's nothing else involved besides the settings shown already.
>>666171I have it set on multiply and I'm still getting the same result regardless of how much I crank the intensity. So I don't know what the hell I'm doing wrong here.
>>666173found thesehttps://blender.stackexchange.com/questions/34902/how-can-i-adjust-cycles-material-displacement-amounthttps://blender.stackexchange.com/questions/116092/bump-mapping-vs-displacement-plus-displacement-nodes-in-cyclesgood luck friend, hopefully you can find peace
>>666175ok so i finally found the key wordits "true displacement" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cbcV1_rgZg
>>666176>>666175>>666173ok this is pretty fucking coolthank you anon, i wouldn't be able to do this without you
>>666163>blender sculpting is extremely tiringWut, Blender sculpting isn't tiring at all. What's "tiring" about it?>is missing many great features zbrush getsThey are different packages, so of course they don't have the exact same feature sets, but Blender can do pretty much anything Zbrush can do, one way or another.>and cannot handle large amounts of polygonsIt can handle many millions, so that's not true, but it's true that Zbrush can handle even more. That has to do with Zbrush' special viewport, which actually renders shit in 2D.
Blender, more like BLUNDER, amirite?
>>666109>Noobest of noobs here.Jokes on you, I'm such a scrub that I have nothing to show for it!
>>664235I too have created my very first creation after watching Andrew Price's Doughnut beginner's guide tutorial for Blender. I think I nailed it.
Is there any way to do something like 3DS Max's 'Bevel Polygons' operation in blender as a modifier? It's like extrude but you can resize the polygons like inset. From what I can tell, Blender doesn't have any such option in it's editing tools. For context, I have a row of polygons shrinkwrapped to the side of this model and when to make them stick out in a round curve. Solidify only makes the polygons go straight up. Obviously I'll just do it manually now for time but it would be nice to know in future if it's possible.
>>667570No idea what you're trying to do here.Try to explain what your goal is?
>>667571Sorry, I fudged the explanation. In Max, Bevel on polyons (faces) is like extrude but you have the option to resize the extruded faces. I wanted to have Blender do something like that automatically, after the shrinkwrap modifer. Solidify can 'extrude' it but it has no option to make the extrusion smaller.
>>667575Just like (E)xtrude and (S)cale...?
>>667577It scales along the normal like inset but yeah. I want it to do that automatically as a modifier after the subd and shrinkwrap stuff though.
>>667578Alt+S to scale along normals.Displacement modifier for scaling would also work, I suppose.
>>667579I guess it's just different principles or whatever between the programs. Max has a lot of operations as modifiers, so you could technically have a primitive with a stack of tweaks to shape it without ever needing to make it an editable mesh. Blender seems to be all about editable mesh from the start, since primitive settings have to be chosen from the get-go.
>>665138he's right tho
>>664179working on this.still go a long way to go till im finished.
>>664235>spectacular bro, nice work
>>664252nice file name
Really been enjoying getting into 3d stuff lately, relaxing to work on. Feel like I need to commit more to one project, I get bored or distracted by another idea after 4-6 hours working on one thing usually.
Does anyone know of a way to keep the grid and axis lines in the render? I really like how it made this sort of look like 70s tech. I screenshotted my workspace screen to get this
>>668849well, in eevee, your viewport is the same as the final render. just crank the samples up in your viewport and use screenshots