Describe this style/level of technology.
Daz3D.
>>660437Daz3D: 2000HOMM3: 1999
>>660438Poser.
>>660439*check wikipedia real quick**damn, this guy is good*
>>660435This is characterized by the complete lack of self-shadows on the characters. The only shadowing is due to the overall light direction. I would guess that anything that looks like an actual shadow is painted on after the fact.>>660438This is Daz3D results in 2019. In 2000 it was much worse than this.
>>660445>This is Daz3D results in 2019. In 2000 it was much worse than this.I wasn't thinking about the rendering quality. What made me think of Poser/Daz3D is the style of the characters.
This belongs to style called "Latent homosexual white male obsessed with power fantasies due to inability to exert any kind of control on his life due to shyness and beta character type combined with lack of intrinsic aesthetic skills"
it's ugly
>>660445>This is Daz3D results in 2019.u w0t m8
>>660455xD
>>660435This artwork is a bit touched up.All 3D artwork in HOMM 3 was done in 3D Studio Max with Release R2 and R2.5. Extensive use of popular plugins like Metareyes, Clothreyes, Dirtreyes, BonesPro, Pyro etc. The standard scanline renderer was used for rendering.
>>660476DoF overdose.Cute for a Daz cancer
This >>660455and this >>660482are like two opposite sides of /3/. Impressive.
>>660455the image posted from tumblr was the cherry on top>>660482Do you by any chance have renders of 3d models that were used for making combat sprites?
>>660476God, everything about her looks wrong. >face of an actual 10 year old>but she has tits>paunch>but with abs>overall minimal muscle tone>but with absFuckin' dazlets.>>660487>DoF overdose.That's what you get when you rely on HDRIs for your backgrounds.
>>660560Just a handful of renders from Tracy Iwata and April Lee(she posted on /vr/), done for HOMM 3/4 and M&M 6/7, but probably nothing that is useful to you.
>>660561>t. Butthurt sculptfag
>>660571It's not meant to be useful, I just like homm3
>>660571>HOMM 4So, so ugly...
>>660525and? both of them are right on the money ))
>>660487This
>>660445
No twist-bones.
>>664028sure, via plugins
