[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/3/ - 3DCG


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: what the hell.jpg (725 KB, 1080x1080)
725 KB
725 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSLJriaOumA

IS THE END OF THE STRIVE TOWARDS PHOTOREALISM NEAR???

>throwback to last year's thread about this
>>
No because this isn't even 3d based itsjust neural networks acting on an image database. Comeback when you can throw in a single photo and get a 3d model with proportions exact to that photo along with textures and ik rig.
>>
>>656449
>>throwback to last year's thread about this
>>
wow its fuggin nothin
>>
As far as /3/ goes, we could do that since 2007.
https://www.nvidia.com/coolstuff/demos#!/human-head
The main reason why models don't look real is the artists making the model either can't achieve realism or doesn't want realism.
>>
A racial generator!
>>
>>656448
CGI will be indistinguishable from real photos and videos so you could be accused for doing something you didn't do.
>>
>>656448
fucking idiot
>>
>>656656
Julian Assange is dead
>>
>>656448
We have a serious problem if the tech singularity happens before the human singularity.
>>
>>656448
Yes anon, re coloring is something from the future



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.