Please enlighten me on the optimal asset creation pipeline. Which apps do I need to:Model, Sculpt, Texture, RigAnd which apps work best together (same shortcuts etc.)?>pic somewhat unrelated, just couldn't find any fitting image
>ModelBlender, 3ds Max, Maya, Houdini>SculptZBrush, 3D-Coat, Mudbox>TextureSubstance Painter, Mari>RigHoudini, Maya, Blender>which apps work best together (same shortcuts etc.)?They are work in their own ways.What matter more is what you intend to accomplish, how different tools serve your goals, and how well they work together in pursuit of those goals. In other words, you'll only get your answer after you've been experimenting a bit with them.
>>632485*They all work in their own ways.
ONLY use industry standard software!My fellow based industry standard software brothers on this board can confirm - It's the way content is meant to be created!™Admit it - You don't want to be a Blendlet!Be based!
>>632483From my personal experience:model,sculpt, texture: ZbrushRig, animate: 3DS MAXAditional Texture manipulation: Photoshop That´s it. Don´t fall for the Substance painter meme.
>>632502Falseflagging Blendlet spotted.
>>632503>Don´t fall for the Substance painter meme.?Gonna need some elaboration on that fampai.
>use blender>have a database of 100000 shortcuts
>>632509>and an empty bank account
>>632512"Max ,Maya ,Cinema4d, Blender or any other 3d packages are the same they are just tools and the main factor is the artistic and the creative side of the user "quote from youtube comments.>bro it's all the same man, no differences. it's all the same objectively and blender is free bro.
>>632514>t. never used anything besides Blender
>>632504>implying you can be productive with Blender
>>632517>not utilizing the best donut production pipeline out there
>>632503>Don´t fall for the Substance painter meme.That's the dumbest thing I've read on this board in a long time.
>>632517>implying teaching normal people how to become Blendlets isn't profitable enough
I use Softimage for hardsurface and rigging, Zbrush for sculpt and substance designer/painter for textures. I'd replace Softimage with Maya or Max if you want shittier software that is still alive however.
>>632503The last sentence proves that nobody should listen to this guy.
>>632485This and ignore every other comment ITT.
>>632485>Substance Painter, MariAre there any free alternatives to these?
>>632503>Modeling and texturing in Zbrush only>Not rigging/animating in Maya>Don´t fall for the Substance painter memeYour personal experience is VERY dubious
>>632614B-Blender... with GIMP?
>>632614Not really. You can try using Blender's projection painting tools, or even their procedurals to attempt a Substance Designer-esque material, but don't get your hopes up too high. My best suggestion is after handpainting in Blender, export to a free program like Krita or GIMP, detail it there, then use the procedurals to create microdetails. Of course, I highly doubt the quality would match professionally tuned software like SP or Mari, but it's your best bet.
>>632614Sculptris is free, has uv unwrapping and texture painting.>>632627I laughed so much, it hurts.
>>632614yes, not paying for them, do you see what I'm saying?
Mari or Substance for game stuff? I would go with Substance, but from my experience with it it has issues with seams, which is really fucking annoying as this kind of program is supposed to make them a non-issue.
>>632672FFS not this argument again, it is a non-issue.If you've got seams on your model you're doing something wrong.I'll never get seams on my model.
i only know how to unwrap and export uv layouts using blender and then i kind of halfass the texture using an image editor but not being able to see it on the model always kills me and is too hard if it's not built of rectangles. is this when surfacepainter makes sense to use?
>>632853>halfass the texture using an image editorGood fucking god, this is an ancient workflow, no wonder it kills you. And let me guess, the end result looks like shit, right?
>>632855yeah if it's not a simple model it's too hard for me to deform texture onto stuff and looks shitty. as hobby i'm okay with it looking bad but god damn it takes too long
>>632853>>632856Dude, you know Blender has a projection painting function, right? Switch to Texture Paint and knock yourself out.
>>632483i spent a little over a year in a small game studio once.our pipeline was basically zbrush for sculpt and model-->maya/max(user preference, some guys used one, other guys sused the other, one guy used blender) for retopo and additional modeling, also some guys used marvelous designer somewhere in between zbrush and maya, also UV's in either maya/max, or i had a license of topogun--> texturing in substance, sometimes photoshop if it was a quick tile-able we already had a texture for--> rigging always in maya, animation always in maya (though i personally prefer max, max has a much easier to use key editor for me), --> then from maya to unreal.maya and zbrush have a nice bridge that makes hot swapping between the 2 pretty painless. substance also has a plug-in for unreal engine that's just fantastic.so i would say model and sculpt: maya/max, zbrushtexture: substance (some studios also still use 3d coat or quixel, but substance is quickly becoming the standard)rig and animation: maya/max, and i'd lean heavily towards maya here.from what i've gathered, maya is way more prominent in gaming than max now, whereas max is more prominent in arch-viz and automotive rendering. though if you want to see some good examples of a max workflow, google the stuff that guy did on the EVOLVE game, he did some nice breakdowns of his monster rigs and their pipeline for that
>>632857i don't actually know how to model in blender, i just use it for decimating, remeshing, marking seams/unwrapping/exporting uv layout, and converting between different formats. the texture painting i've tried was wonky some angles it works alright but soe parts of some faces don't even get painted. i'll try and find some videos for help
>>632509There's only about 5000 operators/functions
>>632959Don't be silly, Blender doesn't have that many functions. There's only so many parameters that go into describing the making of a donut. Less than ten hours is all you need to learn them, as proved by BlenderGuru's advanced course on Blender modeling.
>>632961press space and type "operator cheat sheet"
>>632614There's a plugin you can use with Photoshop. I think it's called Coco or something like that, but it's pretty slow and you have to preview your maps in the engine or 3D app to know what you're doing.
>>632483If you're indiegame deving, Blender covers most of the essentials just fine, especially with addons.The thing Blender is shit at is texturing, so you want to work with a software like Photoshop, Substance or 3DCoat for that.