"Apps built using OpenGL and OpenCL will continue to run in macOS 10.14, but these legacy technologies are deprecated in macOS 10.14. Games and graphics-intensive apps that use OpenGL should now adopt Metal. Similarly, apps that use OpenCL for computational tasks should now adopt Metal and Metal Performance Shaders.Metal is designed from the ground up to provide the best access to the modern GPUs on iOS, macOS, and tvOS devices. Metal avoids the overhead inherent in legacy technologies and exposes the latest graphics processing functionality. Unified support for graphics and compute in Metal lets your apps efficiently utilize the latest rendering techniques. For information about developing apps and games using Metal, see the developer documentation for Metal, Metal Performance Shaders, and MetalKit. For information about migrating OpenGL code to Metal, see Mixing Metal and OpenGL Rendering in a View."
>>626270>tfw locked into the apple ecosystemlol get a win/linux bro But for real, this is just typical Apple. They love the sense of empowerment that comes with their own gated community. This is pretty par on the course with what they've been planning. Migration to their own set of CPUs (dropping Intel support), further locking out Nvidia GPUs, I bet they're gonna drop AMD too once their GPU tech is good enough. It's quite the massive risk honestly, many things could go wrong and consumers could just drop Apple entirely with their "we are the only good tech for you" mentality. But they've grown such a fanbase that it'd probably work out for them, even if it's detrimental to the consumer. Fuckin' Apple.
>creative people all boast about using Apple>Apple shits on themlmao
K E KEK
>>626270Lol, is Apple retarded or just delusional? Do they honestly think software vendors are going to spend any money porting their shit to Metal when macs are a tiny percentage of the DCC/CAD pie?
>>626292I honestly don't know. I think there is probably a solution, like https://moltengl.com/moltengl/ . OpenGL or Vulkan can probably just be replicated on Metal.
>>626270>should now adoptHow to kill your brand
Apple going pro again, thank God.Lowly Wincucks (Pajeets) will stop fucking shit up.
>>626270As an apple fanboy this is great news!! I h8 those Opensourse fanbois so much I could kill them grrr!!!
>>626270just use gl-to-metal wrappers, which are better than the actual GL drivers anyway
>>626271>Migration to their own set of CPUs (dropping Intel support), further locking out Nvidia GPUs, I bet they're gonna drop AMD too once their GPU tech is good enough.>implying a few years of r&d in cpu and gpu technology will put them on par with the big boys with decades of perfecting said technologies
>>626336The actual performance of any applel CPUs is completely irrelevant. They're a marketing company so spin is more important than results.For example they could licence architecture from jewtel and ayyymd, completely disable speculative execution, and then sell it as being "immune to spectre-class vulnerabilities". It's kind of like taking the turbo off an engine and saying that it's now immune to turbo-lag. Technically correct but you cripple the engine in the process of doing it.
>>626336You'd be surprised at how far Apple has come. Look at their phone chips, those small fuckers are incredibly powerful, beating mid-tier desktop-grade chips in pure performance. Reengineer it to work in a desktop and you have a respectable CPU in your hands. >but anon, that's nothing close to a xeon!And that's where you're right. Apple doesn't give a shit about real, raw performance. They've always stuck to the trend of really really average hardware performance. So the performance of phone chips is perfectly acceptable for their standards.Given their estimate to phase out Intel reliance by 2020, their relatively young-and-still-susceptible-to-Moore's-law R&D (inb4 ree moore's is fake and gay), and the fact that they can and have been hiring engineers from those big boys, it's really not that low a possibility.
>>626343>beating mid-tier desktop-grade chips in pure performance>muh synthetic testslol ok
>>626343>beating mid-tier desktop-grade chips in pure performance.not sure if applel fanboi or trolling
>>626359>>626362The keywords are "pure performance". You put an A11 next to a mobile i5, compare their synthetic performance (not real world), and the A11 does edge just slightly further ahead than the i5. Real world is obviously a completely different scenario. A phone processor obviously can't render a video edit the same way a desktop processor can. The architecture just doesn't allow for it. It's just an example to show that Apple does have the potential.And no, not an Apple fanboy. I loathe everything that they're trying to do currently. Locking users into a proprietary ecosystem is dumb, and annoying especially for the consumers. But I try to stay as objective as I can rather than hopping onto bandwagons blindly :)>see https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/a11-vs-desktop-cpus-actual-comparison.2070693/ for a more detailed discussion
>>626366>i5>A11>A phone processor obviously can't render a videoStart separating CPUs and GPUs.
>>626292I want to say retarded, seeing as they're basically locking out a good portion of their userbase, and delusional for thinking they'll comply with this change.So both, in short.
>>626270That image is so fucking horrible.It's like watching someone about to sneeze but he won't fucking do it and the tension gets worse every second.
>>626460But it won't happen.
>>626270>using apple for anything other than sony vegas
>>626425This will probably go well for Apple./s
>>627342>using apple for sony vegas
>>626270BWAHAHAHA nicely done CRapple(more like CRIPPLE amiright) sheeps. Enioy your USD4000 paperweight
>>626270FUCKING SNEEZE ALREADY
>>626343>beating desktop chips in raw performanceWRONGDesktop chips are big due to the many instruction set extensions mobile doesn't have and support for managing PCI-e devices. What dioes 'raw performance' even mean?