[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/3/ - 3DCG



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: der_blendie.jpg (143 KB, 400x575)
143 KB
143 KB JPG
This board is swarming with delusional blendlets.

How do we get rid of them for good? Autodesk crusades when?
>>
Blender is just a tool. If you're shit at 3D, it doesn't matter what program you use.
>>
>>619194
This, pretty much.

I've seen godawful shit in Autodesk products just as much as I have Blender.

Though nothing will ever top this masterpiece: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDoLszwmL4Q
>>
File: 1523896056448.png (69 KB, 328x407)
69 KB
69 KB PNG
>>619191
>>
>>619194

What if I want to get blendshapes inside unreal? What if I want to smooth my UVs?

RIGHT. You can't even properly relax UVs in Blender, all you have is a shitty smooth sculpt uv tool that makes everything worse.

WHAT IF I WANT TO WORK IN A STUDIO?
>>
>>619211
Then you switch to another tool? It's a free fucking country, I don't use blender, but I don't care if someone else does.
>>
File: 1520498899311.png (343 KB, 500x671)
343 KB
343 KB PNG
>>619214

It's a free country so I'm free to say whatever I like about Blender.
>>
>>619211
??? You can do all those things in blender you fuckhead, have you bothered to try or put the least amount of effort before talking?
>>
>>619211
Isn't "minimize stretch" exactly UV smoothing?
>>
Autodesk buys the blender foundation.
>>
>>619232

It makes everything worse.


>>619230

No you can't. Go on the unreal forum and take a look at all the people who struggle to send a simple animation to the engine. And you can't find a job in a studio if you're only using blender. KYS blendlet.


>>619275

Why would autodesk waste their money on a useless software that doesn't represent any threat to them?
>>
>>619280
>Why would autodesk waste their money on a useless software that doesn't represent any threat to them?


Trophy purchase to show dominance to the rest of the competition.
>>
>>619290
>competition
I don't think solidworks and catia will be impressed by them buying out children sandbox application
>>
>>619280
you sound like a fucking tool. in 5 years, blender will be miles ahead.
>>
>>619308

It won't. In 5 years, deluded blendlets such as yourself will still repeat the same crap over and over again. Truth is, Blender is always going to be the beginner's app. A nice toy to create assets for your PT/survive the night clone in unity.
>>
>>619303
Blender represents a significant share of the freeware 3D modeler market. Autodesk buys out TBF, now all those users are Autodesk software users.

They don't even need to do anything else, things could remain exactly the same, Autodesk's branch of Blender maybe becomes closed-source but the software remains free as if nothing happened. But it would be another shot across the marketshare bow for Modo and even something like zBrush.
>>
>>619290

Buying MODO or Houdini, now that would be a trophy. Buying blender would like pushing a cripple down the stairs.
>>
>>619310
*forgot to mention C4D.
>>
>>619202
It's like if Seinfeldspitstain directed a movie, the only thing it's lacking is the Hugh Neutron memes.
>>
>>619309
Lolz. I think this Autodesk loverboy has delusions.
>>
>>619310
>>619312
Hell, Autodesk should just buy out all the software (even Adobe). Just make it a monopoly like Disney and Universal both are.
>>
>>619387

No I don't. You'll see in 10-20-30 years. Blender will still be an amateur app while autodesk apps dominate in game and animation studios.
>>
>>619275
Autodesk has no interest in a team of unskilled but progressive, highly diverse and culturally enriched bunch of people. Unlike the Blender Foundation, Autodesk is a business and needs to sell things that actually work to stay in business.
>>
>>619467
Hey, the thread's OP is about solving the Blendlet problem. My solution doesn't make Autodesk the most money but it does pull a vanishing act with all the Blendies overnight if Autodesk decides to switch the name.

After that, it would all be a matter of waiting it out for users to re-adapt to the new name while the holdouts get forgotten by time Softimage-style.
>>
>>619468
>My solution doesn't make Autodesk the most money but it does pull a vanishing act with all the Blendies overnight if Autodesk decides to switch the name.
Autodesk's version of Blender might get ahead, but there would still be development on the open-source branch. I suspect most current Blender users would move into that one, and things would remain about the same way they are now.
>>
make autodesk products free without nag messages
>>
>>619211
if your model has proper topo and seams you'll never smooth a UV so basically you're complaining about blender not making up for your shitty skills
>>
>>619191
>Blaming a tool for being a shit artist
>>
>>619462
You know, when people waste their money on something, but they see another thing that is very similar but cheaper, then they try to defend their own product as a way to justify their money spent.
I think that is what happens to almost all autodesk looney-fans like you
>>
>>622533

And how the hell are they going to pay all of their employees you bolschevik commie donut loving cheap ass blendie?
>>
>>622740
>Implying that Maya isn't a few orders of magnitude above Blender in functionality
>>
>>622774
With diversity and inclusiveness. Obviously.




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.