[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/3/ - 3DCG



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: Capture.png (414 KB, 493x408)
414 KB
414 KB PNG
>see threads popping up about not using power of 2 textures
>falling for this

you're not this stupid, are you, /3/? You always use 1k, 2k, etc textures like a good little robot?
>>
File: 1513613758077.png (457 KB, 680x471)
457 KB
457 KB PNG
>>
>>615415
>obvious trollposting
>current year
>>
>>615420
>sucking dick
>current year
>>
>>615423
cmon suck a dick, be grown, be nastay
>>
Bump
>>
>>615388
But there's no reason not to use power of two scale for textures. It's what software and PC hardware has historically expected as input, and everything we have now is built around it to some degree. You could round down to SI increments like a retard, but it's fundamentally the same thing in the end.
I bet you're the same kind of cuck that makes those bait threads about how imperial is superior to metric.
>>
Enjoy wasting RAM and R/W calls, OP.




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.