>>588486
Why does render in pic related look like trash?

>>588486
You know it works with nvidia cards too, right...?

Also it's trash anyhow compared to Redshift, which funny enough, AMD cards can't run.

>>588501
The funny thing is that it is trash compared to Cycles too, which makes it basically bottom-tier of renderers.

>>588486
I love those paper stars on the roof. Great christmas setting.

>>588497
because it was done with a fucking radeon and radeons are trash.

lol i just started CG a few weeks ago and tried endlessly to be able to render cycles on my amd gpu. couldn't do it. but I installed this the other day and suddenly I can render in 10% of the time. pretty neat/10

>>588511
it's better than iray at least

Well, if it looks like shit, does it at least have expansive material customization like Cycle's node system, and good render speeds?

There's gotta be some reason to use it? Unless it's just plain not good yet.

>>588486
Cover your wine barrels with 40 layers of wax for maximum protection.

>>590827
That makes sense.