>dat level of detail, accuracy and work put into>ask for money to keep the development going>get told by movie corp to stuff it>to proud to publicize it for fans for free and become a legend
>mfw somebody actually thinks these renders look good (and detailed!!!)
>>586544Make a Star Trek inspired 3D props. Make a Star Trek inspired web show but better story. Make Star Trek cry from all the money they would lose. Become a legend.
>>586586What are they if not renders, then?
>>586587One dude went through all the autistic tech specs and schematics of this fictional ship and made a virtual reality model of it that you can run around in
>>586587>>586588CBS even went so mad about it, they regularly take down YT videos of this thing so in the end there's only some obscure low res video left in spanish of it and tons of the copycat free version called "stage9" which is probably so bad that they allow it.here's some stuff of it that is left on YT to watchhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXVsGhi9Yjs
>>586590The sounds are fucking incredible and Stage9 doesn't even come close to this in any way
Oh fuck I actually found some of the original promo footagehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xOvFt8D6go
>>586592the lighting is absolutely spot on and looks just like in TNG while stage9 is way too dark and looks like a bad rip from star trek games
>>586592that looks AAA game tier.too bad he didn't make a full game.
>>586592The sound of the massive shuttlebay door mechanism and closing made me cum buckets.
What's so good about star trek anyway. I get that it pioneered a lot of things sci-fi related but it's 2017 and kinda obsolete and uninteresting now.
>>586544>Be CBS>owner of famous subculture sci-fy thing that nerds love and that spawned 6 blockbuster movies in the 80s>sell rights to a Netflix dude who is completely rewriting and modernizing the lore, as it had happened before, many times>obscure nerd programs the old version of your show intellectual property that you´re trying hard to bury, in a simulation videogame thingy without your approvalCBS didn´t burned his house. They were way too gentle.
He could loophole it by saying the funds are for the development of software...right? He doesn't have to say anything about the game?
>>586588it's still fucking rendered
looks bad for 2013-2017
>>586697lmao no it doesnt
>>587212You're right, it lacks diversity