>outsource to India>pajeet renders in Keyshot>uses default materials>print screens frame one by oneSo this is the power of Hollywood......
Lmao. So this is the power of going the peanut-paying route.
>>585829You forgot the last step>amerishits pay $20 to watch this and pay $100 for merchandise
>Woah... this comp looks like ass>Just add a bunch of film grain and crush the blacks on the contact shadows>Perfect!
>>585829This is the role of capitalism, to make everything as worse as possible but not so bad as to have a revolution.
>>585829>pajeet renders in Keyshotlost my shit, thanks op
>>585874Yeah it's moreso rushed comp that's the issue rather than the 3d.
>>585874>crush the blacksnever change, /pol/.
>>585829That looks like a shitty Cycles render with 150 samples and someone forgot to turn on the denoiser. WtF?
I'm pretty sure that's just a bad jpeg and there is no noise in the actual shot. But I can't tell because I don't watch these kinds of movies anyway.
>>585829It looks like shit, which is to be expected of a company that's butthurt over their rival making a successful film saga with a better cast, both in terms of roles and actors, and trying to play catch-up.>khal drogo>muh stonk woman>turbo cuck>token black dudejezus cryst, this really is bollywood avengers
>>585932That's Hollywood for you. As long as it makes money, CGI quality doesn't matter.
Literally what is even rendered in a 3D program in that pic except for the costumes
>>585927KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEKjesus christ anon
It kinda looks like even the perspective of the composition is a little off. And is it just me or Cyborg's arms look weird?
>>586023yeah Cyborg is basically full-CGI except for the face, which is also really bad at some timescheck the latest trailer, its especially obvious when he's in the background, it looks like the tracking was done by some college newbs
>>586027Wait, the OP image is from a trailer? Isn't it that trailers always have shitty looking CGI since the director usually forces them to do specific scenes for the trailer, but they are still far from completed, so they usually just make something passable for the trailer, but it usually looks better when the movie is released?
>>586031well its coming out in a month so I'd assume the latest trailer shows pretty much completed VFX at this point
>>586035In that case, yeah, they're probably fucked.
>>586035Look man i don't want to be the one who defends this turd, but if its a month away then they could still be rendering and fine-tuning (if they wanted too). Its not unheard of that studios finish with the rendering a couple days before they send it to the cinemas.They are still fucked because of the fubar'd Design and story.
>>586035Unless they're working into overtime. If not, then they're boned three ways to Tuesday VFX-wise.
>>586072>>586076yeah they still might be working on it, who knows.. we'll see.. I'm not expecting a great movie anyway, I'm only gonna watch it for Gal Gadot and the couple of scenes where Drogo is a total badass
>>585829>So this is the power of Hollywood...yes. yes, it is. there are 4 different "Hollywoods" right now. which one are you talking about exactly?
>>586186Care to explain? >4 different HollywoodsWhat?
>>586186>there are 4 different "Hollywoods"u dun goofd anon
>>586186Hollywood *burrp* C-132
>>586191Liberal agenda HollywoodJewish elite HollywoodPoo in Loo HollywoodAnd that one lot for everyone else
>>586191- production studios. (small sub companies, studios, digital and other shit. inclusive unions and legaues, agents and production companies with acounting and lawyers tourism and transpotations)- education part of hollywood (pedo-kindergarten, acting and arts schools, martial arts schools)- local market hollywood (the shit where they make US market shows for TV, West Coast and California and L-A)- international hollywood. (blockbusters, heavy international projects, whores, jewish pedophile networks, politicians, millitary, FBI, Mafia and other CIA-shit)>>586219jews are pretty much in control of all market.
>>585927It's actual term you twit.