[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/3/ - 3DCG



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: mememan.png (167 KB, 512x512)
167 KB
167 KB PNG
/r/ing an odd one here, does anyone have the 3d model of meme man? He apparently originated from here and I'm taking a shot in the dark
>>
that's a less-than-five-minutes model, make it yourself
>>
File: dildo.jpg (395 KB, 2575x2575)
395 KB
395 KB JPG
>>581483
oh man this is a masterpiece
>>
>>581730
>the mona lisa's not that hard to paint, make it yourself
>>
>>581483
i've also been looking for it,
i know the model's out there and it's not just a screenshot because slick and trendy avian memes and special meme fresh have been using it for videos and stuff.
Birdman talked about selling mememan cups but i dont know if that ever got off
>>
>>581483
bumping because interested
>>
>>582125

>selling shitty meme sculpt

on one hand why the fuck would you want this

on the other, I commend whoever recognized a lucrative opportunity abd took advantage
>>
>>582134
i'd buy one desu
>>
Was meme man /3/'s official "tan" mascot thing or am i mistaken?
>>
File: 1484048579896.png (241 KB, 514x757)
241 KB
241 KB PNG
It's out there
>>
>>582892
>>
>>582888
it is now.
>>
https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Board-tans/3
>>
>>581483
thats very avant garde
>>
kill me now
>>
File: 1506264157081.png (260 KB, 484x605)
260 KB
260 KB PNG
...?
>>
>>582125
This doesn't look like the original. Can you confirm that it is?
Look at the nose. Its different at the top. (no hump)
>>
>>585930
I see the same shape on the nose between the eyes on both images, it's not really a bump as in an extrusion it's just a quick turn inward.

I think the specular on the first image just exaggerates it more than the flatter lighting in the second.
>>
>>585972
On one hand it is good enough even if not original and i would not spot a difference unless i knew

on the other hand if it's not the original it does not hold the sacred soul of the meme and it's kinda ruined for me. thats why i did not attempt to sculpt it myself, because it is not the true meme man. It would be merely a copy.
>>
>>586063
Absolutely, if it's not the real thing then it doesn't count.
>>
the face of beauty




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.