[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/3/ - 3DCG



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: Renderman.png (16 KB, 297x168)
16 KB
16 KB PNG
What do you guys think of Renderman???
Also RenderMan thread.
>>
Never touched it, but seeing how most other renderers just rip off its algorithms and features I guess it's ok.
>>
>>562915
awesome, but my boss only allows me to work with Arnold, still better than vray I guess
>>
>>562915
Renderman 21 and Arnold 5 have converged quite a lot. It's very easy to start using one when you've used the other.

Renderman seems to produce slightly more beautiful renders out of the box. But it's buggy and has strange defaults, crashes Maya, fails to work with xgen, and so on. Renderman is slightly faster than Arnold but it may depend on what exactly your scene contains exactly.

I am an autist and having that slight increase in render appearance is worth putting up the bugs so it is my renderer of choice.
>>
>>562919
What's wrong with Vray?




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.