lumion pls go
>>549576this is not color balance at, it physically hurts to look at.no refraction, motion blur, geometry is very blocky and worst of all absolutely no z-depth blur.even the opening page on there website is trash
the fact that people genuinely uses lumion in a commercial, non-ironic kind of way gives me hope for my own eventual archviz career
>>549600I said it in the last shill thread, and I'll say it again.Tools like Lumion do have their place and can give decent results incredibly fast. They are, however, no substitute for actually knowing what the fuck you're doing.
>>549600Its the clients fault. To cheap to pay for quality.To dumb to see quality.
>t. lumion CEO>>549600its not archviz, its architecture. its for quick prototyping mainly like sketchup style.but i agree its just looks bad without an artist touch. better leave it matte. however it might be really good for outdoors because that's generally take longer to make