how would i go about making something like this?
>>549029There used to be a nice tutorial on it for Blender in Cycles but the idiot hosted all of the images on a temporary host and only half of it was archived so it's missing all the actual innards.The basics of what you'll need to look for are: Procedural lava material Blender CyclesYou're better off looking for it yourself on YouTube, got basically dialup here.
>>549029sculpting software+ image editing software/ pbr texturing software
>>549029Make a ball out of dirt and put it in the oven at 500F for 4 hours
>>549029Displacement and emissive textures.
>>549071You dumb fuck its a material
>>549080Sorry for being a Ricky Retardo, but what kind of node is this? I'm drawing a blank.
>>549081rock node lol
>>549081i think its invert node anonidk why he called it rock
>>549127That was it. Never would have thought to try that one.
>>549080What software is that?
>>549131Blender with a gay pink theme.
>>549075Lmao you're the dumb fuck
>>549080i'll have to give that a go tomorrowbut what theme are you using?
>>549029I found this one online, but I don't know how it works.https://blenderartists.org/forum/attachment.php?s=31c58f742128afe101f2cdec423fd1ae&attachmentid=78192&d=1247360116
>>549181I tried it myself for the hell of it.It looks alright enough.Only thing weird are those sections that are red in the middle of the lava.Not really sure why it's happening, but I'm sure it's an easy fix with some tweaking.
>>549289>alright enoughIt's not even alright. It looks fucking horrible and not even remotely similar to OPs image.
>>549453Blame >>549080I just copied the nodes.I didn't make shit.
>>549289looks like "how to make a fire planet in gimp" art circa 2008
learn how to render fgts haha but in all seriousness blender is an amazing tool. you guys just had me switch for good.
>>549534that looks just as shitty as >>549289 if not more
>>549536Like I said before, in >>549470I didn't make anything from scratch, it's just a copy of the nodes earlier in >>549080I just thought I'd save the other dude from trying it himself.
I got a blend file here. https://www.mediafire.com/?74yrgoea1au7zx6The nodes are mess though
>>549534How do people think this is acceptable?
>>549536you're fooling yourself
>>549534kek this is so fucking badtypical Blender shit from /3/
>>549662Not him, but it does look subpar. >>549552 is currently the only one that comes close, and it needs to lessan the displacement for the fire/lava.
how are you guys getting this close? min looks like fuck and i filtered it because im a cunt
>>549534not sure why everyone is giving this so much hate. apart from the glassy surface i like it aesthetically better then the original. >>549552nice but turn the scale up a little>>549670nothing like the original
Download some sharp rock dispacement map.connect a ramp to it that is red and yellow in the deepest areas of the displacement.DoneI used the procedural fractal in maya so the details doesn't look the same but i think most of the other stuff is fairly similar.
>>549712also shit-tier, sorry
>>549712Nice UV stretching
I think I might create a lava material for you guys in Substance. What I've seen so far is mediocre.
>>549852Don't waste your time.https://share.allegorithmic.com/libraries/629
>>549854I've seen it, but I don't think it offers enough customization options.
>>549852I actually wouldn't mind that.I don't really have anything I'd need lava for, but I still wouldn't mind having it.
>>549552who would someone credit this to?
>>549961Post No.549552, /3/, 4chan.org