realistic 3d hair is impossibleprove me wrong[spoiler]protip: you cant[/spoiler]
You mean games. Right?
>>539234We're definitely getting there
>>539234You sound young and so pretentious OP! Congrats!!Are you talking about games or film?
>>539250Overall
>>539258So what's the point of this? Bait? Are you bored? Are you dumb? Do you want to argue logistics?
>>539259Because no one has ever succeeded in making realistic human hair
>>539260...for games
>>539262In general
>>539260
>>539266Burdon of proof is on you. You have to show a realistic set of hair to prove your point
>>539265For general games?
>>539267>Make a claim>Can't back it up>No you have to show meGet the fuck out of here.
>>539267Well, my proof so far is knowing you are talking out of your ass arguing logistics because now I know you don't pay attention to films to make this claim.
>>539271>>539269How can i show that something doesnt exist?
>>539272because your so naive and pretentious in your thinking that you really believe what you're saying and you started this shitpost/bait thread in hopes of others doing the work for you. It takes maybe an hours worth of research to know that you have no clue what the fuck you are talking about.
>>539234Is this a Monday thing? Are people just dumb and retarded come Mondays?
why would it be impossible?it's just a massive amount of splines
>>539241How does this run now? Could I get 1440p on a 970? And is that using a shader of some kind?
>>539267ok
>>539339>Expecting a person who doesnt know how to spell burden to know what burden of proof is
>>539307If it is possible how come no one has ever made it?
>>539341It takes forever?
>>539308I think its some shader trickery mixed with basic bone physics and its not that expensive
>>539341Check out the Saya thread then, here's the most update version of her>>538576
>>539367Gooks plastic figures dont count
>>539339>>539269>Asking someone to prove there isn't a teapot in orbit around the sun>Acting as if they know how burden of proof works.
it's difficult indeedhttp://vico4444.deviantart.com/art/30-10-2016-Kfjjhggfedsd-643006891
>>539241how does one even go about modeling hair like that?Does AAA studios have artists that only work on hair?
Nvidia Dawn original tech demo came close.
>>539267I'll take the bait. Just this once so that everyone else doesn't have to.
>>540667This triggered me, it looks literally like a toy story movie with that fucking plastic face
>>540667Tbh thats a bad example of realistic hair
>>540723Not the guy who posted it. But I think it's a good example.
>>540715>wants to see realistic hair>complains about face
>>540667That's really stylized. Quite the opposite of realistic.
you can, but needs power https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePBGO8h5OJQ
>>540715dude it's an animated movie, you expect them to go for a realistic face shading style?
>>539234moana
>>539893You use hair cards with unified vertex normals.The reason it looks impressive is the texture and shader work, but it is unlikely that they have artists that only work on hair.
>>539339No but really, If he hasn't seen a good example of realistic cg hair is he just supposed to dump images of all the bad cg hair he has seen?Would it not just be easier to show him one picture of good cg hair?
hey look cg hair
hey look more hair
>>539234Brave is tge best youll get but theres a lot of programming involved
>>539265Are you retarded or have you never seen Pixar?
>>542174>>542173>>540772>>539239Enough proof for you OP? Shitpost somewhere else
