Trying out the asset store to see if I can at least sell some cheap $10-15 packs, making everything the same way as I would normally (pro gamedev)https://www.assetstore.unity3d.com/en/#!/content/72585Feedback on the content or the presentation welcome, and share your own shit if you're a publisher
>>538310Really sexy. Very economical too which I think people might find attractive. Reminds me of metal gear.
Be sure to include a pic with wireframe anon. Speaking as a gamedev who buys asset store stuff. Otherwise looks cool, I may even buy it
>>538310Really not sexy. Not economical at all which I think people might find unattractive. Reminds me of the awful ps1 game graphics
>>538310Be sure to include a refund option anon. Speaking as a gamedev who buys asset store stuff. Otherwise looks garbage, I would never buy it.
>>538310Ooo you're Harley Wilson, sick
Global Rule #11 :Advertising (all forms) is not welcome—this includes any type of referral linking, "offers", soliciting, begging, stream threads, etc.Enjoy your ban shitposter.
>>538310It's nice but I wouldn't buy it.
>>538312I didn't think of this, will do at least for future packs.This and I'll mention refunds are no prob
>>538323>Feedback on the content or the presentation"Feedback on the content or the presentation"Reading's hard, huh?
>>538310Report advertising spamsHide advertising spamsIgnore advertising spams
>>538314Will add something in my description about refunds being no sweat."Otherwise looks garbage"How so? Anything specific?
>>538312also, anything you might like to see for a Vol. 2 pack?More architectural elements? More sheer quantity of assets?
>>538324Too expensive for what it is, or another reason?
>>538310awfulalso reported for advertising/spamming
>>538348attempting to get feedback on how my content is presented and all, but sureIf you have any actual crit, I'd be happy to read it
>>538316I've never liked the idea of making a fake company name like "whatever games" or "something studios" if I'm just one guy, so hopefully I can just use my own name to the same effect
>>538352Didn't mean to sound like satire, I meant I really like your work, browsed you on artstation, and coincidentally ran into you here )
A series of boxes, by Harley Wilson
>>538352>I've never liked the idea of making a fake company nameThe purpose of Incorporating (or pretending to) is that liability, tax burdens, and so on attaches to the Corporation, and not yourself.This *probably* won't ever matter for you, but in case you ever DO do something where multiple people are involved and you're making real dosh, you really ought to be Incorporated. It's not that difficult, it's not that expensive, it lets you write lots of things off as a business expense, and it means Harley Wilson won't be the target of spurious lawsuits
>>538310This might be the worst laziest piece of shit I ever saw on assetstore.
>>538401Yeah, let's not over exaggerate there anon. If you say that, you probably haven't even been to the asset store once.
>>538372Ah, that's really cool :)
>>538405No it really might be the most unappealing garbage I've ever seen.