Hyperrealictic 3d lolis when?Also how do i get into daz/poser/iclone to make 3d pr0nz for myself and not publishing?Is it possible to make a 3d clone of someone in programs like reallusion's character creator? If not then how?Plx respondddd
The area between eyeballs and lids looks uncanny.
most people would say it's morally wrong, but so would most people about poop sex. If it requires the law to be changed you can be pretty sure it won't happen in your country legally. No politician want to make that case, it's career suicide.
>>536302It does no harmYou could make the same argument about lolis in hentai
>>536298Thats not 3d but a real picture of a girl. You faggots say uncanny uncanny when told its 3d. If you people are not told, you guys wont have a clue.
>>536312Sorry to burst your bubble pal, but I can see the 3d right from the thumbnail.
>>536317Elighten me without using the word uncanny or any of its synonyms
>>536319I'm not the anon you're having a pissing contest with, but that's a fairly well known piece of digital art.As for how you can tell by looking at it... I can't. The depth of field looks wrong, like it was faked in post, but they sometimes do that on photography, so that's not really an indicator to me.
>>536319Her shoulders just don't look right to me.
>>536320I am just pissed because people shit on almost prefect works such as pic in OP by saying uncanny this uncanny that.
>>536319>>536298>Not criticizing the hair
>>536325Hair look just fine except where they are blurred
>>536322If you actually failed to capture reality and managed to make it look uncanny then it is certainly not perfect.
hair really fucked the otherwise perfect render
>>536319You are either really new or really stupid. That root of the hair is what gives away almost all 3d portraits. And hair in general in this case. Its nowhere near being realistic. Face is a 10/10 though.
>>536285She has peach fuzz.>believing poser or daz with ever reach this level in our life time>especially poser>such imagination to believe in such
>>536285This>>536400Nigga you probably aren't even good enough to comprehend the effort, knowledge and commitment that went into making something this good. And anyone who spends that amount of time, energy and resources on something isn't going to do it for fucking porn. Daz and poser is extent of "quality" for you'll ever get for your shitty fap sessions. Not even AAA Studios have been able to completely nail the hair part(they are the primary reason hyper reaslistic CG from even big studios look like CG), so forget about that.
>>536402Not even stills?
>>536402>anyone who spends that amount of time, energy and resources on something isn't going to do it for fucking porn.>assumes porn is the ulterior goal>complains about studios supposedly not being so good>thinks quality requires being a sexless monk>complains about shit that makes no differenceWhen will you people ever understand? When the technology improves for everyone we all reach a new level for those with exceptional skills exceed above and beyond.You're stuck thinking with the old binary two dimensional logic system that keeps everyone stuck doing the same old.Go ahead brag about the few with supposed "skills" because they have computers, and money to do it and watch where they'll be in 2 years.When the technology improves for all of us, we all get to move up.
>>536472>technology = qualityI hope you're not actually in the 3d industry and you're just here to shitpost
>>536285>Hyperrealictic 3d lolisDAZ only have the uncany valley atm.You´ll have to fap to that.
>>536403B4 i answer than i want to see something you made 3d, just to see your lvl
The hairlines over the right eye are exactly symmetrical aligned. This whole thing is complete garbage confirm
>>536475u sik fuk
>>536481I can confirm your are a piece of shit. The hair line area is literally the only major flaw in this image. If the model had some kind of expression enstead of the completely blank t-pose lvl stare, this would have been hard to identify as CG from a zoomed out perspective. The pic looks like a test render, no rule of thirds, no polish. It would be a 10/10 with a little work.
>>536475looks so shit. there must be something better available out there.
>>536475shit this nigg alook like an ape haha
>>536487just make them yourself? it's not that hardpeople obviously won't release anything too explicit because it's illegal mostwhere
>>536474No, not the case, but in fact an honest opinion which you're free to disagree with if you're able to articulate such a disagreement.
>>536487Well...Any g3f figure+grow up package+new gens v7 goes for the pedobears. sik fuks
>>536487But there is.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYP2tInr_YY
>>536834is this ylyl thread
>>536285Anytime you want.
>>536834I think that's the figure from >>535251 thread
>>536312I reverse imaged searched it.,.. its made by a Japanese digital studio.
>>536493We are apes.You're an evolved ape alien.
>>536874Yes, ape dna spliced with alien faggot dna
I want to get into loliology too
>>536285When ever you want
>>536285nude references of loli (pictures of them) are actually impossible to find.Get bikini references and go to work, but chnaces are that all your effort will end you up straight in jail.What, you can even get a BAN here if you insist.
>>537558Funny part is, that would be actually helpfull to real girls, because pedos would be fapping to 3d models instead of hunting them in the real world. Even 4chan is dumb in this aspect.
>>537558>reference picturestrue>picturesfalseyou see that shit in somewhat recent german films like the Baader Meinhof Complex.
When I see 3D models, it's usually not the quality of the appearance that looks fake to me. It's the awkward stiffness of the movement. Point and case is the Kingsglaive FF movie. The image realism was great but the "acting" was shit.
>>537584Kingsglaive was generally low budgetBut 3d scanned facial rigs are as accurate as you can get now, we only need to catch up wity better physcially accurate sss shaders
>>537584movie was garbage
>>537584dude uncanny lmao
>>537530dude uncanny lmao
How do i get into this stuff??
>>537708Model realistic loli, fix model over and over untilit looks like a photograph.Make porn out of her, go to jail.
Dude uncanny lmao
>>537711You leave Josie 6 out of this! Josie 6 a PURE!
men are so putridi love using them
>>537584That's because while they are masters of 2d, japs can't animate 3d for shit. Their 3d animations always look like slowmow and way too robotic/perfect.
>>537708Take a mediocre 3d modelPut her in a mediocre 3d room with mediocre 3d objectsAdd DoF, chromatic aberration, film frain and a couple of instagram filtersYou have got yourself a realer than life photo
>>537721Your forgot to attach a dick and pose for fetish porn.
>>537731>attach dick to a girlNo i am not a gargantuan faggot
>>537732That is how to daz though, also torture porn.
>>537733torture > trannies
On legality.If it looks like the real thing, you have no defense.
>>537739Whats the point then
>>536475i-is there a nude version?
>>537558looks pretty good, except the legs seem too long? where is this model from?
>>536874Is this just a joke?
>>537739Most of the US allows it though, as long as it is made understood that the images and graphics are fake.
>>537772 Dunno. It was either that or a pic of a real little girl i took in the beach. That last one is a no-no in any 4 chan board, even if it is not porn.pic not related: honey select from illusion. meh.
>>536285You'll either need good textures or an insane amount of polygons. Which means you need like 64 gb of ram to render something like pic related.
Oppai-loli really is superior.
>>537530Thats not cgi
>>538305God dammit. Why does nobody every bother to texture their teeth properly. You can't just apply a while plastic shader to teeth and expect them to look good. Teeth aren't white, they're ivory coloured and they are not evenly shaded either there will be variation and cleavage in the enamel. They'll also be a little translucent where they are thinnest. And that's not even getting into the shaping. Nobody has perfectly uniform teeth there will always be some bigger than others, some at different angles and spacing than others even with people who have had braces.
>>538362Thats daz man. Bunch of lazy niggers.70 morphs to move the boobs around doesnt leave much time for teeth.Though i do believe there are aftermarket fixes for this.
>>538364To be fair, that is a decade old model.
>>537712I keep expecting there to be a spooky ghost photoshopped into the background
>>537858about honey select, can you POSE your girls as you wish? Or is everything a preset?
>>538927wtf?! I love diaper porn now!
>>538936No anon, not even that redeems it. You need halp. I must admit it took like seven whole seconds for me to finish processing how I felt about what I was seeing tho.
>>538927Yeah, you can even mod in your own models/textures/animations.
>>538937yer right.I just have a thing for cute skinny blonde girls.Anyone have sauce? She's got to have some regular stuff right?